Online Journalism vs. Print Journalism: Real Time vs. Batch Processing
from the think-about-it dept
Last week, there was a bit of a silly fight over the NY Times publishing an article noting that blogs sometimes publish rumors. I didn't find the story to be all that bad, actually, as it did a fair job explaining why those blogs publish rumors without confirmation, and how they do it in a reasonable way (i.e., saying it's a rumor and hasn't been confirmed). Some felt the article was a hit piece, but on the whole it actually seemed pretty reasonable and accurate. Still, in response to that, Cody Brown (via Jay Rosen) put up a fascinating and thought-provoking writeup comparing online to print journalism -- noting that print is "batch processing" while online is "real-time processing" and explaining why this makes it so difficult for print to either understand the value of online journalism, or to keep up with it. To be honest, I think the point was made even clearer in last week's hilarious Daily Show takedown of the NY Times, where Jason Jones refers to the newspaper as "aged news" and asks Rick Berke, the assistant managing editor to point out a single article in today's newspaper that "happened today" (at around 3 minutes):Fair enough... But what happened on Friday? That's when the NY Times falsely reported that The Pirate Bay had lost its appeal... and that false story has remained uncorrected at least up until I published this story. It appears that the "pride" the NY Times takes in getting the story right doesn't necessarily extend to things like The Pirate Bay.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: batch processing, fact checking, journalism, online, print, real-time
Companies: ny times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I just knew you would start linking to that one! Can't resist, can you?
"It appears that the "pride" the NY Times takes in getting the story right doesn't necessarily extend to things like The Pirate Bay. "
Sort of like your pride in knowing how many seats the pirate party got?
The print media has the unhappy problem of actually printing. You have the ability to rapidly go back and edit, the NYT isn't going to go rip pages out of consumers hands and hand them new ones all day.
Basically, technology has yet to make it possible to hold an electronic newspaper in your hands (kindle is closest, and still not very good at it), and that it what the public demands before newspapers will go away.
You can't stop selling buggy whips until that new fangled auto-mo-bile thing actually works.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pride in what?
And doing this second hand by using AP material is no less unethical and cowardly. Although i admit it is cheaper.
Oh well, I guess you get the journalism you pay for...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
newspapers
how about a attack of common sense?
(my last suggestion was applied data minging for fun and profit. i want to be paid for this, too)
newspapers are dying.. yet the comics page os still being stolen out of coffee shops (HINT)
web 2.0 is going broke, except for craiglist's 100 million in personal ads
RIAA 30,000 to zero no wins. (IRAC., min of denfense, NWO , that sort of thing)
conservatives attack at gun point , get rich, leave the rubble behind (canada's nuke med isotopes, ie:)
just a few suggestions..
packrat
--
http://packrat.comicgenesis.com
stalking millionaires - the comic!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Indeed, the NYT can't exactly update the printed newspaper on the fly, but that's no excuse to not update the website when new information comes forward. The NYT should not treat their website as a complete mirror to their dead-tree product. The two (print+online) can complement each other, it's not an Or/Or situation.
I also doubt right now that the general public wants a Kindle like device to read newspapers on. Unless that device becomes a lot cheaper.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A Newspaper!
no... Your Balance sheets!!!
wokka wokka wokka
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"You can't stop selling buggy whips until that new fangled auto-mo-bile thing actually works"
Actually there still is a market for buggy whips... just a very limited on. Hard copy wont go out of style for a very long time, if ever. It will just be substantialy reduced.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nothing new
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nothing new
Actually I think you mean:
The inaccuracies of the Mainstream media is nothing new. What is new is the ability to reveal it inaccurately over the internet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Citizen Journalist
Time progressed until we had national newspaper chains printing what they wanted us to read, while the small shop had the mimeograph. Radio started to grow along with Television. But still the citizen journalist could be found expressing his ideas.
Time of course did not stand still, but the national consolidation of News outlets continued at a rapid pace, until all news became one news. Still the citizen journalist was able to get his ideas out with the use of the photocopier at less expanse than before.
Now we come to the present time where an elitist group the so called main stream media (MSM) has homogenized news to the ideals of it's corporate ownership. All the while the MSM journalists sniff and turn their collective noses skyward at the thought of the citizen journalist. Because today one man with a computer and an internet connection can influence the masses of the world.
As I begin to fear the tyranny of my government, I know that I posses the ultimate weapon. Freedom of the press (the citizen journalist) with the ability to radicalize (go back to the roots of) the republic.
I would make only one change to the constitution, everywhere it says "the right of the people" I would change that to "the right of the individual" just to make things clear.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The Citizen Journalist
[ link to this | view in thread ]