DailyDirt: Nature Creates Some Cool Stuff

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Insect evolution is pretty amazing in general, but there are a few examples that are almost incredible. For example, people have discovered enormous ant colonies, wasps that can create zombies, and the ways that insects exhibit a collective intelligence that looks surprisingly smarter than any individual bug. Considering that insects, by weight and numbers, surpass humans by at least an order of magnitude, we might want to keep an eye on these invertebrates. Here are just a few more fascinating examples of awesome insect abilities. If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: ants, astronomy, biology, evolution, fruit fly, gear, insects, nature


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Beta (profile), 6 Jan 2014 @ 6:56pm

    painting without a painter

    "When this fly flaps its wings, it confuses its predators -- but some observers say the images are of spiders (not ants) and trick spiders into thinking about mating (not eating)." (Boldface added.)

    The idea that these markings must be images of ants or images of spiders (but not both) is a silly human idea. They are markings that tend to reduce the fly's danger of being eaten. They were not put there for any purpose, nor in any deliberate imitation of ants or spiders. How much they beguile spiders is testable, how much they confuse other predators is testable, but there is absolutely no reason why they can't do both. (And in a sense, the spiders and other predators collaborated on the design.)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Alana (profile), 6 Jan 2014 @ 8:00pm

    We need nature-rays just so we can run around and shoot people screaming "GET SOME NATURE IN YOU, BOY."

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    ryuugami, 7 Jan 2014 @ 3:50am

    naturally-occurring gear in nature

    Best wishes for 2014 from the Department of Redundancy Department.

    With that out of the way... I remember reading some really cool & creepy articles about various insects on Cracked. For example, I seem to recall that the biggest ant colony covers several continents. (A colony being defined here as ants working together instead of fighting or ignoring each other. Maybe we could just call it a nation instead.)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous, 7 Jan 2014 @ 8:03am

    Re: painting without a painter

    "They were not put there for any purpose". And you know this how?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jan 2014 @ 8:11am

    That does it I'm getting tattoos of dragonfly's, In hope it'll keep the mosquito's away.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Beta (profile), 7 Jan 2014 @ 12:43pm

    Re: Re: painting without a painter

    Because I get my knowledge of biology from science, not folklore.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    John Fenderson (profile), 7 Jan 2014 @ 1:25pm

    Re: Re: painting without a painter

    Beta is correct. It's an annoying thing the press does when reporting on All Things Evolutionary: asking "why did that evolve?" as if there was some kind of thought put into the process. There was not.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous, 7 Jan 2014 @ 1:28pm

    Re: Re: Re: painting without a painter

    Just remember you said that with the next Piltdown or Java Man they pull on you.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    John Fenderson (profile), 7 Jan 2014 @ 4:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: painting without a painter

    *rolls eyes*

    Hey, you know who discovered that they were hoaxes? Scientists. You see, while errors and frauds appear in literally every corner of human endeavor and understanding, the process of science does a fantastic job of correcting for that.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous, 7 Jan 2014 @ 4:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: painting without a painter

    "They were not put there for any purpose". How has science conclusively proven that?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    Beta (profile), 7 Jan 2014 @ 5:11pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: painting without a painter

    I argue with creationists once a year. I don't want to use it up on the seventh of January.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.