Dear Newspapers: You Don't Have A Monopoly On Local News Coverage

from the neglect-it-at-your-own-risk dept

In talking about business models for the newspaper industry, one point is often discussed: that newspapers are uniquely positioned to provide really good and thorough "local" news coverage. And while they often do a superficial job, in many cases they really don't provide as useful or as thorough coverage as they could. And that's opened up the market to others -- both big and small. We've seen a bunch of stories about various "hyperlocal" startups growing up. But, it need not be startups. BullJustin (who, btw, was the fastest on the trigger and was the very first buyer of our CwF + RtB store) alerts us to a story about how sports giant ESPN is moving in a big way into local sports coverage, hoping to take attention away from newspapers who could use some competition on the beat. Funny then that, as we're being told that there's no business model to support beat writers, ESPN seems to be finding an increasing need for them.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: journalism, local news, sports coverage
Companies: espn


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2009 @ 9:37pm

    ... and the 300 pound gorilla sits "here" for a moment.

    Newspapers don't have a monopoly on local coverage, but can you tell me exactly how many city council meetings ESPN will cover?

    I ask because as the bigger national players pick away at local coverage, we risk ending up with a sort of "clear Channel for local news" where your local report is in another city 800 miles away reading press releases because there isn't anyone on the ground anymore. Run the newspapers (and local TV) into submission, and then stop paying the stringers and ask the local teams to send press releases with the scores and news instead. Perfect business model, right?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), 23 Jul 2009 @ 11:08pm

    Re:

    Newspapers don't have a monopoly on local coverage, but can you tell me exactly how many city council meetings ESPN will cover?

    Heh. If you paid up for you Techdirt Crystal Ball you'd see we have an upcoming story on exactly that point. There are lots of new organizations springing up to cover local news and the do an amazing job of it.

    If there's demand, the products are made. You have such little faith in the markets ability to work.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    wrallen99, 23 Jul 2009 @ 11:48pm

    Local News

    I agree with you. The local news from the newspaper is getting less and less satisfying. There is a great need for a news source that provides comprehensive local news. Right now it takes many RSS feeds from many sources just to get a moderately decent picture of the local news.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    NullOp, 24 Jul 2009 @ 3:05am

    Newz

    Local news from the "Big Guys" is mostly crapola. They mostly print news that has been managed, i.e. sensationalized for the benefit of sales. The same goes for TV. When I do read the paper I am amazed what makes the front page and whats buried in the back. The only paper I really enjoy reading is the WSJ. Generally, journalism is dead in America.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2009 @ 5:36am

    Re: Re:

    Haha, having not paid for the crystal ball and waited a few minutes, I got to read your "story" about the local news and I pretty much spit my coffee out.

    Technically functional solutions (in that case insider info) doesn't make it news, it just makes it a one sided story. It makes "news by press release" look like deep and meaningful journalism.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    moses, 24 Jul 2009 @ 7:23am

    re:monopoly

    Trouble is the internet has come along and we have all become journalists - it's very easy to do moses basket

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Migzy, 24 Jul 2009 @ 8:37pm

    Another Local New Source - Online Bulletin Boards

    Recently my dad came out to visit me, when he got a call about forest fires near his house in Kelowna, BC, Canada. While on his way home(4 hour trip), I was able to do a quick internet search about it, and give him several updates as to what was happening. I found a few articles on a couple local webpages, but I also found a bulletin board dedicated to fire coverage in the area.

    What I found simply amazed me. There were people on there listening to the fire scanners to find out where the various fires were, how big, etc. A few of them were even some people who opted not to evacuate the evacuation zone. Not to mention, during a local thunderstorm, a number of people actually went out to investigate some of the lightning strikes or to see where the firetrucks went and report on whether or not a fire had started, if it was out, etc. While I wouldn't call it traditional journalism per se, but I would definitely say they are providing a source of news, albeit in nearly real-time.

    In addition to providing real time news, the boards were also full of offers to house people, pets, horses, etc during this time of need. Some inside the evac zone even went out of their way to check on neighbors pets, as the evac order was given shortly after the fire was started in mid afternoon and many weren't home at the time and weren't allowed to go into evac zone. The board allowed for a lot of people in the community to really come together in this time of need.

    All in all, the board provided a welcome community that no next day newspaper could provide. In fact for a lot of stuff I would consider newsworthy such as local spot fires that started but were put out were no where to be found leading many people to wonder where the fire trucks went or if the fire was out.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.