Court Strikes Down Blackboard E-Learning Patent
from the took-'em-long-enough dept
You may recall that Blackboard, an e-learning company, got itself a patent a while back that seemed to cover pretty much all e-learning -- and then went about suing others. After a lot of controversy, the company agreed not to sue open source e-learning companies, but everyone else was fair game. The only problem? The patent was almost certainly ridiculous, and numerous thorough breakdowns of the patent raised serious questions about how it ever was approved in the first place. But, of course, the process of invalidating a patent is notoriously slow, and a company can cause lots of trouble in the meantime. In Blackboard's case, it went after competitor Desire2Learn.Even as the Patent Office realized it needed to rethink the patent, the lawsuit moved forward, with Blackboard scoring a win. Of course, just weeks later, the USPTO gave an initial rejection of the patent. The original court ruling was (of course) appealed (separate from the USPTO ruling), and the good news is that the appeals court has dumped the entire patent. Only took a few years and millions of dollars wasted in legal fees for Desire2Learn. Too bad such money couldn't have gone towards actually improving e-learning. In the meantime, why doesn't anyone ask how such a patent got approved in the first place?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: e-learning, invalid, patent
Companies: blackboard, desire2learn
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And yet
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Its not over.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All e-learning, you say?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Done.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I doubt that. I could only come up with one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
"And here, all their troubles began. Farmers throughout Georgia resented having to go to Whitney's gins where they had to pay what they regarded as an exorbitant tax. Instead planters began making their own versions of Whitney's gin and claiming they were "new" inventions. Miller brought costly suits against the owners of these pirated versions but because of a loophole in the wording of the 1793 patent act, they were unable to win any suits until 1800, when the law was changed.
Struggling to make a profit and mired in legal battles, the partners finally agreed to license gins at a reasonable price. In 1802 South Carolina agreed to purchase Whitney's patent right for $50,000 but delayed in paying it. The partners also arranged to sell the patent rights to North Carolina and Tennessee. By the time even the Georgia courts recognized the wrongs done to Whitney, only one year of his patent remained. In 1808 and again in 1812 he humbly petitioned Congress for a renewal of his patent."
http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/cotton-gin-patent/
Also found this interesting (same link).
"However, like many inventors, Whitney (who died in 1825) could not have foreseen the ways in which his invention would change society for the worse. The most significant of these was the growth of slavery."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1418165.stm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wasted?
Spoken like a non-lawyer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It was never patented. So it is NOT number three
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lawyer Up, Rubber Stamp, Cash In, in that order
I wonder how many ex-Examiners and Patent Lawyers live in East Texas, how many current Judges list that as past experience on their CV, and how many gallons of expensive booze are drank, and cigars are smoked, lit from money printed with many 0's, before being thrown into the fireplaces inside the Judges' chambers.
Win-win for them, and we all lose.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Oscillating Law Sprinkler
The patent system should leave a competitor free to design another version of an oscillating lawn sprinkler. (It seems that the concept of reverse engineering has been hounded out of existence.)
Abstract concepts, such as business models or the concept of an Oscillating Law Sprinkler should not be patented.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Lawn sprinkler
Do I really need a patent to water my lawn? Oh, I know I'll patent the rain, the condensing lawn sprinkler.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Got to hand it to the courts
Imagine how ludicrous it would be to allow a single company to control all of e-learning. That is what was happening up until this point.
Although they did back off open source projects in the end, they were very hostile at first and are still very hostile to any other commercial offerings.
I actually used BB for several online classes and components of face to face classes. I found their offering to be quite sub-par. I remember thinking my BBS had a better commenting and messgae board system... lol
Seriously though, I hope to see real innovation going on here because e-learning needs to embrace the possibilities of technology.
Something as simple as just having an actual picture of a student next to their comments would be great.
That is until someone patents that process as well :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Got to hand it to the courts
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What, you think nobody asked this? You think nobody in the learning community has been talking about this? D2L got a big boost from the community in this case as people got together and argued - via a wiki - that the patents should never have been approved in the first place. This page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_virtual_learning_environments - was created specifically in response to the question you say nobody asked.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
New Competition for Blackboard
For more on patent infringement see, http://www.generalpatent.com/patent-infringement
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]