Japan's Smile Scanners A Classic Misuse Of Technology
from the smile-for-the-scanner dept
As pointed out on the Freakonomics Blog:Japan's Keihin Express Railway Co. has set up "smile scanners" at 15 of its stations, where railway employees have their smiles assessed by software in the hopes of perfecting a customer-friendly look.This is such a classic misuse of technology by a corporation. The goal of the company is to provide more positive and friendly customer service but its technique of using a "smile scanner" is going to have the opposite effect. Nobody likes to be forced into happiness, and the employees will end up resenting the scanners, their bosses for making them use the scanners and the customers for expecting them to smile.
Instead, a smart company would try to figure out how to make its employees genuinely happy so that they smile because they want to smile. This would create endless positive outcomes for the company, the employees and the customers.
Sometimes technology can look like it provides a quick fix when, in fact, it is just an illusion.
Cross-posted from MyMediaMusings.com
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: employees, japan, motivation, smile
Companies: keihin express railway
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dave, you are attempting to apply your desires (truly happy customer service) over the railway's intention (transient appearance of being happy). Since Japan's customer service is already generally at a high level, they are trying to refine a look and an appearance, not to make their employees happy.
"he goal of the company is to provide more positive and friendly customer service but its technique of using a "smile scanner" is going to have the opposite effect. Nobody likes to be forced into happiness, and the employees will end up resenting the scanners, their bosses for making them use the scanners and the customers for expecting them to smile. "
That would be a very western, very independant mentality. It doesn't really apply in Japan.
As a side note, your personal site is a cesspool of popup ads and really poor layout. It's hard to enjoy a site when a full page dhtml overlay ad comes up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Is your claim that the Japanese prefer to be constantly checked to see if they're smiling?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
The Japanese wouldn't look at a smile camera as a way to check they are smiling, but rather as a way to improve their appearance to the public. It's sort of Kaizen for customer service as it were.
It's a cultural thing, something that most western people would never get.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If employees were against this system, they would refuse to use it (or find a way to get the system withdrawn); this is similar to the West. Why do you think no one cares here (apart from the technological aspect, which is fun)? People are not dumb accepting something they don't like without protesting.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I can appreciate that a culture that prides itself on public appearance (we Brits spent lots of time doing this) would value ways to improve that image. While the Japanese have a strong sense of honour and duty to what they do, there are always personal limitations and emotional repercussions tied into everything as well.
Would scanners be more effective at encouraging employees something like than supervisors doing occasional cursory checks?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
or, for that matter, some bits of New Zealand culture.
such as it is.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's all in the way that these things are looked at.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hmmm yet you still read the articles.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thing is, this system is not aimed at forcing people to smile; they're already smiling. All employees of any company/store in contact to the general public are already smiling. This system is a gauge of the "quality" of their smile. It sounds weird, but this is because it's supposed to be fun (and people here are quickly discarding the news as being funny). It's trying to improve an already good service quality with fun (what better way to improve smiling than with a funny system).
As to whether this is better than guidance and critics from a human being, I'm not sure there's a definitive answer to that. But smiling appears to me as being subjective (I mean the opinion of whether a smile is a "good" smile or not), so at least a machine gives clear rules and unbiased opinion, based on the sole physical caracterictics of the face. A human being might take into account the history of the person examined, her body language, and his personal feelings towards the employee, although this shouldn't be when solely judging how good a smile is.
All in all, whether the system is better than a human is not a bid deal (except for the people whose job is in relation with that system). Originally, this was just a fun news in my opinion. And many japanese companies try to promote technology as a support for business (sometimes they try useless things), which reads positive to me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
My comment has more to do in the end with the concept that this guy is an "insight expert" and also a technology boss at a movie company. I would expect more, not less. Most of the insight experts have sites that don't impress me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AnonC and Cable have a point
This is why comment sections are great -- they allow balance through discussion of other viewpoints. Thank you both for educating me. (See, westerners _can_ learn.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
diet and train wrecks
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oops.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
as to the merits of this argument, it's pretty damn silly. do you really think walmart or any of your local big boxes could get someone to care more? working at a big box is the most demoralizing bullshit anyone can do, and it's only tolerable when you're a teenager. when i was a teenager, you could have tripled the wages of the entire employee base and most of them would still hate the place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
That's hilarious! Funny +1
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To those who think this is just Japan's culture, no, this is the corporate culture where the workers are peons and the executives are Holy Emperors.
Fuedal society never really left that country.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
An objective use for smiles
(Seriously. Some bank robberies can be stopped before they even start by the teller just making eye contact with the would-be robber, smiling at them, and being polite. Sadly the URL I had for the page describing the study behind this seems to have expired.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cultural and economic differences
Rather than saying you can't understand because this is a foreign culture, let us say that this is a situation where the social and economic forces are somewhat different from what you assume them to be.
For instance: there is no tipping in Japan. In fact, a tip can be taken to be a serious insult. So you do not have the whole dynamic of an employee trying extra-hard to please a customer with the expectation of increased direct monetary reward.
However, as AC says, customer service in Japan is excellent. Things which would be considered going the extra mile in the US are normal and expected there.
Now, Japanese consumers do make decisions about where to spend their money on a company-by-company basis partly based on customer service. But if the actions of customer service are already as improved as they can be, how can a company compete? By affecting the perception that customers have of those actions. And smiling employess will give it that extra edge in customer satisfaction. So this smile-improving program makes sense in that context.
Plus, all the publicity they've gotten off of this can't hurt, either.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Really, just a one-day trip to Japan would show how differently they view customer service. You as much as say that with your MacuDonaldoru example. I agree.
Scarr, here are some examples of how different things are:
- The taxi drivers wear white gloves. They are very polite. (does that sound familiar). And there is a tradition of opening the door for passengers, limo style. But that tradition has been modernized, so they have installed remote-arms to control the passenger door, and the driver can open your door for you like a school bus driver does it in the US.
- walk into any retail store, you will immediately by set upon by about 8 young ladies yelling "konichiwa" across the floor. You will have one approach you and ask if you need help, then ghost you around the store. When you leave, not having bought a thing, as you are about to pass the door, 8 young ladies will yell out "arigato" or such, smiling big all the time, and seeming very pleased that you graced their store with your presence. BTW, I'm not talking some high-end jewelery store - this could be any store, like a postcard and trinket shop. Every store, every time.
The culture of service is different (and I think better there). I the US and the UK, the "all men are created equal" notion pervades the service sector. You, and the guy behind the counter at Wimpy's are equals, he just happens to be working and you just happen to want a burger. But in Japan, so long as he is working and you are a customer, you are the king and he is your humble servant. When he takes off his Wimpy's outfit, and you're both on the train to go home, only THEN are you equals.
Sounds like class warfare to Americans but it is the SERVICE industry, no? Why not make an effort to live up to that promise.
Like I said, one trip to Japan, and you would understand.
BTW, I worked for Disney (as an wireles exec) and marveled at the rules for appearance put on the cast members. There were rules for facial hair, make-up, etc. I wasn't too keen on those, but there was also a rule about smiling. And I'll tell you what, it worked very well. It's a theme park, it's the service industry, it's marketed as the "happiest place on earth". The smiles were contagious. The guests felt a positive energy. There are dozens of reasons why you want your paid staff to smile or fake a smile. It delivers a measurably better experience to the customer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
There are lots of little stresses in Japan that could cause a person to suicide, and faking a smile at work is not the most convincing reason.
How about a culture that forces conformity with "The nail that sticks out gets hammered down"?
How about a culture of marriages of convenience, where husband and wife lead separate lives in narrowly pre-defined roles?
How about a culture that almost requires a salaryman to spend his evenings drinking himself stupid with his co-workers, grabbing the last train home after his family is asleep, getting a short night's rest, and repeating the same the next day?
Think of it as better or worse if you want, but mostly it's just different. And you will never be able to fit your values around their way of life.
There are real stresses and problems in their society. The lack of individuality in the personal life is one I would decry. I don't think being forced to smile while working is so bad. People all around the world do stuff they don't like for a buck - that's why they call it work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You can't optimize what you don't measure
You can't optimize what you can't measure. And the Japanese are very big on optimizing processes for quality. They took Denning's views seriously, while Detroit did not, and transformed themselves to the top of the heap in terms of industrial quality, and they're quite justly proud of that accomplishment.
In order to do this, one thing that is required is to MEASURE the quality -- and everything that goes into that quality.
So, if the COMPANY wants to know how they're doing, and to optimize it, if they have an object measure, that's good. If they're making their employees miserable, and it's affecting their happy appearance, that should show up, and they'd know they were going in the wrong direction!
And likewise, the employees want to make the company successful and to visibly play a role in that success. So, to the extent it's a tool used to help everyone do a better job, it's a good thing.
Of course, it could be used badly. But there's a deeper potential problem -- measuring the wrong thing. If they device measures the facial expression in a certain way, that's what they'll optimize -- making the software happy.
That may not translate into making customers happy! A common pitfall is to measure the WRONG THING! That can be tricky.
I don't know how this will work out. Probably the novelty of the idea will produce some good results at first, and any problems will only come to light later.
But I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it will produce unhappy workers. Done right, both in terms of the work environment, and what the software measures -- and in an environment that encourages feedback from workers about what works and doesn't -- it stands a chance of working out well for all concerned.
But I hope they do some followup validation of the concept.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]