Is Serendipity Lost Online?
from the i'd-say-it's-been-gained dept
I'm a big fan of Damon Darlin, at the NY Times, but I'm a bit confused by his latest, claiming that serendipity is being stamped out online, because people just go find stuff they want, rather than randomly discover stuff. Perhaps I'm just speaking for myself, but I end up finding random stuff all the time -- whether it's from seeing random links on Twitter/Digg/Fark or other sites, having people send me stuff or just chatting with people. I'd argue that I end up finding a lot more that's new and interesting than I did before the internet was around. Darlin tries to brush off the fact that people get stuff from friends on social networks, by saying that's "filtered" by who you choose to follow, but his own example of serendipity at the beginning of the article is: "When we walk into other people's houses, we peruse their bookshelves, look at their CD cases and sneak a peek at their video collections." Isn't that "filtered" by whose homes you happen to walk into? I walk into strangers' homes a lot less often than I hear about a new book, album or movie from someone on Twitter.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: culture, online, serendipity
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
umm stumbleupon.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Randomly Discover Stuff
Between Yahoo Pipes, several blogs (and one blag), twitter (including TwitScoop), and various online news sites, it's actually very hard to not be bombarded with new, random discoveries around the clock. Certainly better than the occasional visit to a friend's house.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Funny thing is...
Hasn't this man ever gone to youtube or wikipedia, started looking up something... and after 20 clicks of 'related videos' or any of the sub-links on the page, end up somewhere completely random and in no way similar to your original search?
People who have no idea what they're talking about should just stop ... writing.
I think I have an idea for a new website. It'll be called "Missed the Boat". Think similar to failblog... but it will display the comments and writings of those who simply "missed the boat" on technology. It's like they're over in left field ready for the pitch... and we're playing football. :P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reddit has serendipity
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Surreal
Compare to the brick-and-mortar world, where even when I go out looking for an unknown new experience I've got less than a 50/50 chance of finding it, let alone when I'm not looking.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: umm stumbleupon.com
My roommate can spend hours clicking the related links in Wikipedia and Youtube (I've seen him do it).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Particularly not when you consider the dreary, ignorant and uninterested staff that tend to monitor actual book stores today...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Totally wrong.
The internet gives us control over our serendipity. We know we want music, so we go and randomly hit up band pages on MySpace. We want movies, we randomly watch trailers on YouTube. Serendipity is alive and better than ever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: umm stumbleupon.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Funny thing is...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Funny thing is...
Damn, I was going to post exactly this. So, yes, I no longer have to get up and go somewhere (physically) for serendipity to rear its irresitably ugly head.
Column deadlines can make people say strange things.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
tvtropes links.
to the point where people actually put Warnings on such links because almost everyone who goes to them ends up spending hours just hopping from one to the next reading the random interesting things.
i mean, sure, it's organized, but you never know Where you'll end up when you start down that path :D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Maybe the NYT just has an incredibly paranoid content filter and Mr. Darlin doesn't have home internet? If not, wilful ignorance is the only explanation for his problem. Hell, look at his "arguments":
"But CDs have disappeared inside the iPod."
Yes, I can carry around more albums than I could ever physically carry, many of which are downloaded from sites like eMusic and AmieStreet by independent artists I discovered through those sites.
"And shelves of videos are rarely seen as we get discs in the mail from Netflix or downloaded from Vudu."
Yep, I no longer have to be limited by the relatively meagre selection at the local Blockbuster.
"And, one day soon, book collections may end up inside a Kindle."
While the loss of a paper product would be a tragedy, it ain't going to happen in our lifetime. Besides, same argument as above - your local bookstore or library doesn't have Amazon's selection.
It's not the internet's fault you can't look at a selection of virtually every album recorded, every DVD released and every book published and not find something new to discover.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Reddit has serendipity
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i just proved him wrong
sorta proves him wrong, doesnt it? Otherwise, how can he explain how i read his article, if not for seredipty leading the way???
[ link to this | view in thread ]