Italian Newspapers Get Gov't To Investigate Google For Not Sharing Ranking Secret Sauce
from the seriously-delusional dept
A bunch of folks have been sending in the news that Italian regulators have begun an investigation into Google, at the request of some Italian newspapers. The complaint is a typical one from newspapers who seem slightly clueless about how Google works. They say that Google News is unfair -- even though they can opt-out, but don't. The newspapers falsely claim that if they opt-out of Google News, they also have to opt-out of Google Search. That's simply untrue. But even if it were true, I'm not sure what the point would be. Getting traffic is a good thing. It's unclear why Italian newspapers (or any newspapers) don't like it.In fact, the whole idea that Google News is unfair for sending traffic is undermined by the other complaint from the newspapers: that Google doesn't reveal how it ranks stories:
Because Google does not disclose the criteria for ranking news articles or search results, he said, newspapers are unable to hone their content to try to earn more revenue from online advertising.Of course, that's silly. First, plenty of people have figured out how to optimize for Google -- there's a whole industry called SEO that does that. That doesn't mean that Google needs to reveal the secret sauce. But the best response to the demand for Google to reveal how it ranks stories comes from Danny Sullivan, who turns the story around, and wonders how newspaper would feel in the other direction:
No newspaper editor of any quality would allow an external interest to walk into their newsroom and demand to know exactly how to guarantee a front page article about whatever they want. But that's what the Italian papers seem to desire. Google has an editorial process for producing rankings, one that's done using automation -- but the papers seem to want to bypass those editorial decisions.Exactly. The newspapers are basically demanding that their stories get ranked higher, but how would newspaper editors feel about the subjects of stories in the paper demanding that their stories be on the front page. After all, being on the front page would get the subject of a story more attention, and the newspaper isn't paying those subjects -- so the newspaper is "getting all the value." -- at least according to newspaper logic.
Sullivan also does a good job highlighting how useless it would be if the newspapers did get the details on how Google ranks stuff, because then everyone would just start writing stories to get to the top of the list, and any "advantage" would be lost. Separate from that, shouldn't we be just a bit troubled to find out that the newspapers are interested in figuring out how to write stories that top Google, rather than writing stories to better inform the populace?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: antitrust, editorial, google news, italy, journalism, news, ranking, seo
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
You seem to assume...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You seem to assume...
>creating ad revenue. Which they don't.
Some do. The problem is that lots of newspapers got bought up by Bastards who only want profit. Rupert anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In this case, people that had not heard about the investigation and the reasons behind it could refer to the old discussion and those wishing to read the full referenced article could. I fail to see the problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Cross linking does nothing. Cross linking is one of the first things that Google cracked down on, because its something that's so easily abused.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
He has demonstrated his lack of many times. Search Engines are just another area of the net he has little understanding about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well now...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sigh....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sigh....
Okay, first of all, kudos for the four-dotted punctuation. I do that all the time as a silent tribute to the original Star Wars movies. Not sure if you're doing the same, but whatever...
Secondly, I wonder how many people have been to Europe and Italy when expressing surprise at this story. I love that country, namely because of the food, the drink, and the fact that the Italian people are some of the most culturally passionate people on the planet.
But I sense that it's that same passion that gets them into trouble at times. You get these odd, knee-jerk emotional reactions on a macro level that simply aren't very well thought through. Perhaps it's that same mentality that has led to some of the issues the country has had throughout history.
In any case, this egocentric attitude coming out of a few of the European states rivals even America's which is saying something. Most don't act that way, but a few of them have just as large of heads...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
to be fair,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh no, not a gain ....
"It has begun a study of the possibilities for charging readers for access to newspaper Web sites, for example."
charging readers ... hmm ... wonder how thats going to work out for them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The links above gave me an idea .....
nnn Note/entry) Create a standard for a web based library card and paid content, with credit card processing and micropayment capability.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The links above gave me an idea .....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The links above gave me an idea .....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The links above gave me an idea .....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]