Conde Nast Discovers That The Streisand Effect Reaches Russia Too
from the did-they-not-realize-this? dept
A bunch of folks have been submitting this positively bizarre story of how publishing giant Conde Nast (who publishes, among other things, GQ, Vanity Fair, the New Yorker and Wired) basically tried to completely bury an investigative piece recently published in GQ about Vladimir Putin. Conde Nast basically tried to do everything possible to make sure that the article was not seen in Russia. Beyond the obvious things of not publishing it in Russian editions, it didn't put the article online and basically buried it within the US GQ issue it was published in. It's not mentioned on the cover at all.Now, there have been plenty of reports about how journalists who have been critical of Putin have an odd history of dying young -- but it's not clear if the goal here was to protect the reporter (who's pissed off that this whole thing happened, and doesn't want CN protecting him). The bigger issue have been that the company feared how its Russian magazines would be treated following the profile. But, if that's the case, why do the report at all?
In the meantime, of course, with NPR breaking the story of how much trouble Conde Nast went to hide the article, they've pretty much guaranteed that the article gets just that much more attention in Russia.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: gq, putin, reporting, russia
Companies: conde nast
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This is like hiding blood in an ocean - sharks will find it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re: Chargone
Even bad publicity can be spun the right way. the steisand effect combined with the internal memo could end up helping their American sales in the end.
Are there any people who have read the article and have some insight into how the russian public will react?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You clearly don't understand Russia
By doing their best to bury this both in the Russian magazine and company-wide as regards Russia (including allowing themselves to be publicly martyred in the West), Condé Nast is protecting themselves, their Russian employees and their reporters, and for that deserve credit.
The word you're looking for is Realpolitik, Mike.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You clearly don't understand Russia
Then why commission the article in the first place? They don't deserve credit at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Shark two: Blood in the water. *puts on sunglasses* I see.
*OH YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhh*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: You clearly don't understand Russia
>They don't deserve credit at all.
Editor: This is a great story lets run with it. It's all set to go.
Corporate Management: Do you know what sort of life expectancy Putin's enemies have? Pay the man and make it disappear.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gawker crowd-translated the article to Russian
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]