Prison Guards Suing For The Right To Bitch About Their Bosses In Private Online Forums
from the unfair-discipline dept
A group of five prison guards in Australia wanted to bitch about their boss... and did so in a private group on Facebook. Yet, somehow, their superiors found out about it and accused them of misconduct and threatened to have the guards fired. In response, the guards are suing, and saying they should have a right to speak their mind on a private message board like that. As a union official notes:Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, bosses, complaining
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
You can alter Facebook's setting so only your friend and read cretin posting, beside the Government of Australia is not a business, they should allow worker and citizens to speak their mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And by the way DUMB-ASS, whatever you put on Facebook IS private.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh,
DUH!
Go back to school for reality and get out of your fantasy world where you think that what you put on the WWW is private.
HA!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
1) Explain how you can legally access a private page on Facebook.
2) Explain how, if it's not a legal method, it won't get either thrown out of court or get the person who uses said private information arrested for felony access to a computer system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
A subpoena from the appropriate court will do the trick nicely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Idiots are often ignorant of their own stupidity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rights!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rights!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm generally supportive of the "employment at-will" practice, and supportive of employers being able to hire/fire for most any reason they deem necessary. In general.
However, "employment at-will" does not correlate 100% to the legal environment here in the U.S. or (as I indirectly understand) in Austrailia.
Every boss SHOULD know there are potential liabilities for certain kinds of conduct in disciplining employees.
In the case from the article, this particular "boss" is so monumentally stupid, he actually called out this group "bitch session" as the reason for bringing disciplinary action.
In light of the expressed ignorance of this "boss" and the company who allowed him into that position, I wholeheartedly support the full litigation of the colon they are about to receive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Libel and Slander laws are undergoing a huge shake up in the US and other countries due to the move away from written word is actionable because publishing was so expensive as to be only the realm of the newpaper and professional publisher. Now we are ina world were publishing your thoughts is the equivalant of spoken unoffical speech because anyone can do it. However the laws still hold that things published can be grounds for libel... so what is free speech now when it's published for the world to read?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As I have said before, DUH!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the article:
"...they had made 'unauthorized public comment' on their department's work and 'comment to the media without permission.'"
Bitching in a private Facebook group of five (or so) members is now making a public comment to the media?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]