You Don't Get To Double (Or Triple) Dip On Damages For Both Copyright And Trademark Infringement
from the it's-really-only-one-copy dept
Lately, we've been seeing a lot more copyright lawsuits coupled with trademark lawsuits. Quite often, the idea is to use the trademark claim to get around any DMCA safe harbor that's been claimed, but some may be doing it to try to increase damages. It looks like at least one court has stopped one attempt to do just that. Michael Scott points us to a ruling in NY, where a software developer charged someone else with both copyright and trademark infringement. The accused never responded to the lawsuit, so the original developer won a default judgment. However, on requesting separate statutor claims for infringing on copyrights and trademarks, as well as on violating the DMCA, the court said no, pointing out that it was really only one copy, not three, and thus the end result only "produced one harm."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
My comments have nothing to do with double dipping on copyright or trademark infringement, which inherently I see is wrong, almost as wrong as the crap that spews from Derek's keyboard and mouth. In any case, I am pissed. More so at the fact that the powers-that-be created an incredible amount of cheap money out of air.
Hell, our money is so worthless and cheap we can afford to air into a shipping container and send it back. When it returns, it comes full of cheap chinese plastic shit. Yay.
So we have a lot of hot air here. Why don't we send some of these Birthers and old white guys from places like Utah in these empty shipping containers and make them work?
I will gladly find a way to put Derek on the first one. And we wonder why we have frivolous lawsuits like this. We're cheap, easy and full of Hot American Air from a bunch of blowhards that don't represent the desires of the American person.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Finaly
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If I copy your story and sign it as written by "Coca Cola", that's clearly two separate offenses: first I copied your story, then I lead people into believing it is somehow associated with Coca Cola (r).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You have failed to grasp the point of the article Tino.
[ link to this | view in thread ]