EU Worried About IP Harming Innovation... But Gets It Backwards
from the sigh dept
Rob H alerts us to an article that starts out sounding reasonable... pointing out that politicians in the EU are meeting because they're worried about intellectual property laws holding back innovation in Europe... but then it goes off the rails. You see, they're not worried that the laws are holding back innovation because they're too strict, but because they're too weak. As you look, though, you realize that these politicians have basically been lobbied by businesses that want protectionist policies. The "report" they discuss talks not about how to better incentivize innovation, but how to "better favour business." What that means is they went and spoke with a bunch of incumbent businesses, not innovative startups, and those businesses said they want more patents. Someone should send them a copy of Boldrin and Levine's book...Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: eu, harm, innovation, intellectual property
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The problem with incumbents..
The startups just don't have the same resources.
How can we convince our politicians (in all sectors) that disruptive startups are a good thing for the economy as a whole, and we should encourage them when the gigantic encumbants have their ear and are whispering the exact opposite to them?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The problem with incumbents..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The problem with incumbents..
(Lily Allen's entry and quick exit from the copyright debate is also a palpable analogy to "real" politics)
How does one get the attention of someone outside of their 'clique'? How do we insert ourselves into a conversation between self-absorbed, self-important gibbering teenagers?
The only ground rule that seems to be apparent in the government clique is "money talks".
That means we're kind of screwed until someone can out earn the incumbent interest, or better, put them out of business... which they are trying to prevent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wow
This story made me sad, but not surprised. As always in politics, its not the volume of your voice that gets you heard, its the volume on the table....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wow
This is typical Western government thinking. We've had it too easy for too long and are busy making the rope to hang ourselves with.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Gee mister, what did you saw we were going to do with this rope once we've finished weaving it? I hope it's fun, to make up for my sore hands... Wow, we're going to build a swing! .. oh, we're going to _swing_!! At least we'll do it together. Mister...? Mister..? Where'd you go? Wait a minute, where's my wallet? Mister, did you see a wallet lying around here?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Corpocracy?
In one breath the political voice of all parties condemn monopolies and push for stronger IP.. I don't think they make the connection, or realize the harm their doing to innovation as a whole.. At least I hope not.
Consolidation is the single most destructive force to innovation there ever was. The corporate Oligarchy disdains innovation and uses IP to destroy and assimilate competition before they can threaten the status-quo. The truth is that it's easy to lobby for stronger IP, because what never was is unquantifiable. They simply take innovation, which is a force that cant be stopped by paper tiger monopolies. Then credit patents as the culprit for all of humanities modern innovations.
You-Tube is an excellent example, I heard so many people decry you tube as "pure theft" (to quote Joe Bidden) in 2002 wondering how they can even exist legally. Fast forward.. now imagine life without it. Again, if it hadn't been consolidated under Google it would have gone the way of countless other competitors/innovators ..to the bit bucket. THATS what IP REALLY does: it consolidates innovation into the hands of existing monopolies, who **USUALLY** just kill it.
I would like to know what % of IP Patents are in the portfolio of companies like MS as opposed to companies that are still small and scrappy (and practicing those patents). more over, I would love to see how the patents have moved over the years. As in who originally filed them and the path that they took to where they are today. That would show I'm sure that once a patent is proven viable it's acquired.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
IP laws promote a weaker industry.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
experiments with chimps
The politician sees a failing market; the treat is already moving away. The politician passes strong IP protection laws to improve the economy. The market accelerates its decline; the treat moves away even faster. So the politician passes stronger IP protection laws and the market goes down more. This cycle repeats indefinitely. The politician may realize that the observed result is the opposite of the intended result, but never makes the connection to perform the opposite action and weaken IP protection.
Therefore, a chimpanzee is obviously smarter than a politician.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
EU and IP
[ link to this | view in thread ]
IP Laws too weak in EU - Good News
[ link to this | view in thread ]