More Industry Anti-Piracy Propaganda: Former EMI Anti-Piracy Boss Launches 'Educational' Program
from the 2+2=? dept
With the school year having only recently started up, we had already covered the RIAA's silly propaganda campaign masked as an "educational resource." Of course, that's not the only such program. The MPAA has offered up its own "copyright education" as has The Copyright Alliance -- an operation whose entire purpose appears to be to push entertainment industry nonsense and propaganda without any factual support or basis. It looks like there's another such program coming out of the UK as well. Torrentfreak alerts us to the news that EMI's former anti-piracy boss just happened to have "left" EMI in time to create her own "educational campaign" about copyright for school children as young as five. The good news, though, is that the reporter from The Daily Mail wasn't buying any of it, raising questions about why five year olds should be learning about copyright from industry supplied sources. The article also questions the claim that this campaign was financed independently from the recording industry, calling out the fact that the woman's own LinkedIn profile indicated otherwise, until she changed it right after being interviewed (funny, that...).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, educational campaigns, propaganda, uk
Companies: emi
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Get 'em while they're young
It's exactly the same process as all the other educational campaigns: teach them in primary school, in their formative years, and the lessons will stay with them for ever.
Look how it's worked for smoking, drinking, respect, political correctness, crime.
Um...hang on a minute. Oh crap.
1st law of child behaviour: tell a kid NOT to do something and they immediately want to do it.
Genius.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You don't even own your own property
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You are confusing "basic human right" with "government granted monopoly"
Try again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's mostly big corporations that are lobbying for these intellectual property laws and it has nothing to do with the notion that they want to protect artists and the altruistic and benevolent nature of these corporations. It has everything to do with their selfishness.
If these intellectual property laws are for individuals and artists let them lobby for this and not just big corporations and lets keep big corporations out of the process and see how far these laws go. I bet if everyone got to vote on these laws they would disappear because they're not for the individuals, they're for the big corporations. and don't give me this nonsense that big corporations know what's best for individuals and the masses better than those individuals and the masses either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Correction, multinational corporate selfishness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
About industry driven propaganda.
By the way, who do you work for?
teaching respect for property?
These education campaigns are not about respect for property. Copyright is not property, it's a gov't granted privilege. Respect for property is something entirely different.
for the basic human right of controlling what you create?
No such right has ever existed.
there are big companies stealing ideas from artists and writers too
No doubt. Who do you work for, again?
is the issue big versus small or the right of a creator to decide how to exploit his work?
Neither. It's about why any industry written propaganda should be allowed in schools.
I know lots of individuals who have made lots of money on their movies and books and ideas and pictures - and they wouldn't have made it if big corporations just took their rights away because there wasn't any copyright.
Who do you work for again?
Anyway, what does that have to do with a propaganda campaign in favor of the big companies...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He wrote the lord of the rings before copyright was established. In fact in America he wasn't releasing with any kind of alacrity. So this other company wrote and published the book eventually J.R.R. wanted to release his work here but the pirated version was cheaper and it was already released. So what did he do, he had a note on the front page saying that his was the official version it was more expensive as well. He probably got rich the official version outsold the pirated version and the other company is no longer around.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, that sounds good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take away recess
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Take away recess
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]