Dungeons And Dragons Online Highlights How Free Can Work As A Part Of A Business Model
from the nice-job dept
Pretty much everyone who reads Techdirt seems to be sending over the story of how Turbine has changed the business model for Dungeons and Dragons Online, going away from charging people $50 for the game and then $15/month to play, to a model where you can play for free and there are additional benefits to actually paying. And, so far, it seems like a massive success. Many more people are playing than before... and many of those who would never have paid (or played!) at all are realizing that there are good reasons to pay for some things within the game. While these sorts of situations can be a fine balancing act (if the company gets too focused on trying to convince people to pay, it could make the free stuff annoying), it appears that Turbine has done a good job finding a sweet spot -- making sure that if you just want to play the game for free, you can absolutely do that and it's perfectly enjoyable all the way through. Putting money into it just gives players certain additional benefits that they feel is worth it. Suddenly, paying the company money becomes a reasonable per transaction situation, rather than an ongoing chore. While it's still early, it should be worth watching to see how well this particular business model experiment goes -- but the early indications suggest that it's yet another example of how "free" can work as a part of a business model.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, dungeons and dragons, free, mmo, online games
Companies: turbine
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I guess most of techdirt readers are in that demographic playing D&D... haha. ;-)
Seriously though, these free-to-play with micro-transaction games will probably be the future of MMORPG. Players these days really don't want to commit to games by paying 30-60 dollars up-front. I can remember multiple times in the past where I bought a MMORPG only to play through the trial period and never to play again. Money wasted.
And I think the ars article has a good point, by removing the monthly fee structure, you are free to choose however much you want to pay at any given month. When you are spending a lot of time in it, you might pay more than $15/month to get all the stuff/packs/quest you need. When you are taking a break, you are free to park your character without having to pay.
In addition to this, ppl who are into it might be consistently paying more (good for the company). The trap of micro-transaction is that each amount is small and you don't feel the effect until you get the bill later. I mean, how many people have spent over their budget to realize, at month end, that each $1 song on iTune really adds up. ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well, I loaded up Techdirt to submit the story, and there it was.
Frankly, the idea of a subscription fee for an MMO is about as appealing as a subscription fee for a music service. I like this plan because I can incrementally reward Turbine for my enjoyment of the game. I've done the same thing buying new installments of Guild Wars. I think I've given $185 to NCsoft for games and upgrades, and I'm the biggest cheapskate I know. All DDO has to do is prove its value.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yeah, but a lot of us are not in the demographic using Windows. Which would have been nice to know before creating an account. Bastards.
*goes to listen to his D&D podcast again*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems to me
This way, instead of paying legions of developers to come out with the NEXT D&D game, less developers can concentrate on developign the existing world and creating future needs of the denizens, and then creating rewarding and useful ways to address those needs for a price.
But part of it also, as William noted, is the ability to "park" your character w/o paying through the nose and then returning, say, months later...BAM! the world you knew has changed. There are new threats, stronger denizens! The weapons race of the MMORPG world has been continuing while you wasted time in the REAL world, and now you are woefully unprepared for the fantasy world (at least parts of it). That kind of thing can build excitement and bring existing gamers back into the fold, and paying once again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Capture outliers
"We went back over the last 6 months, looking at the highest monetized individual on the Super Reward platform and we found an individual who spent US$ 30000 across two games in 6 months. You need to have a model that can capture those outliers, and no one can tell me in this room a pay-to-play or a monthly subscription model that can capture US$ 30000 of value from one individual."
Here is a link to the video
Anders
The Business Model Database
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(please check ONLY ONE response, as checking both options will result in a tear in the space-time continuum as if you divided by zero)
[X] This ONLY works because it is an established franchise with name value recognition. It would NEVER work for the small-time developer without massive amounts of marketing.
[ ] This ONLY works because it is a small venture without the need for a lot of money. It would NEVER work for a big name established developer that needs to pay the bills.
OPTIONAL
(you may check as many of these options as you like, relevancy not required)
[X] They have a right to get paid!
[X] Won't someone think of the children!
[ ] If they have nothing to hide, then what's the problem?
[ ] It doesn't matter how many lives get ruined as long as no guilty person goes free.
[ ] Copyright/trademarks/patents are good, if you are against them you are an anarchist.
[ ] Mike is a poo poo head.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[] Mike is a socialist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, its pure bullshit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While US and European companies were settling into a monthly subscription, Asian servers were putting out "Freemium" services. You could play for free, either for a set level, or without some aspect of the game which potentially gave it greater value.
Turbine is just adopting an existing business model that's been working for several other companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I haven't looked into the D&D game that much, but several comments made it appear as though much of the paid content won't make or break your playing experience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
free online mmo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: free online mmo
http://www.onrpg.com/MMO/Free-MMORPG
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yet there is an in game "Favor" system where you can earn Turbine Points (the company's currency) to purchase these in-game premiums. This is done by completing a number of quests at a set difficulty level. A number of players have figured out how to game this system to avoid paying for extra content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nope. There's an item you find that lifts the level cap every 4 or 5 levels. You can purchase the item for points($) or just find it by playing the game. The lower level ones are very common.
LS: Plus there are two character races and classes which also need to be purchased.
One of the classes was always unlocked after a certain amount of "Favor", but now you can buy it early (points$) if you want.
LS: A number of players have figured out how to game this system to avoid paying for extra content.
It's not really gaming the system to play, gain Favor like you always have, and use the bonus points($) to unlock stuff. Players have always needed to gain Favor to unlock the higher-stat character option, so now they get bonus points for doing it anyway. If you're talking about someone deleting and re-creating a low level character to get the quick low level bonuses, I don't think many people do this since it's still a crazy long amount of time.
The other thing to remember is paying monthly is still an option. $15 a month (or whatever) to have full access to everything and some free store points($). The sad part is, it's not a great deal for most people, since you could spend the monthly fee on points to permanently unlock the content that gets re-locked if you unsubscribe.
Not to be completely defending Turbine, their advertising is over the top and fairly offensive. There's constantly new deals and in-game prompts to open the store and buy things. "Aww, the Orc killed you, buy a Potion of Beefcake in the Store to get revenge!"
It's an interesting experiment, and I'm glad to be able to tool around for a few hours a month on it without paying anything, but I don't see it fully catching on in the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds great, but still unanswered is how much impact will the Turbine v Atari lawsuit have on the game?
[given that Turbine has said Atari must OK all new content and if Atari is correct in the audit, Atari could terminate the licensing contract.]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The thing I really like about this model is that you can take a break for awhile and not worry that you're spending money on a subscription you're not using. Very handy when the player is an 8-year-old who loses interest for two months and then suddenly wants to play again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The folks at DDO had my email address, and they sent me an invite to the free game. I followed the link, but I didn't download the software because they use a third-party app to download updates and/or content while playing the game.
I had never heard of the company before, and being the ever wary techno geek I am, I elected to not install the game. I don't want software on my system that may do things I don't want it to do, or may open me up to exploits.
To be fair, I do not know if that is the case in reality, but why open yourself to the potential risk? Upon learning now that it isn't really free to get the "whole" game, I feel now, more so than before, that I made the right decision.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free Online Work
Click the below link!!!!
http://www.waoIndia.com/register.php?r=sarathi1234
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
per click $1.00
$1000.00 Pay out! It is True, Click the below link
http://www.richptc.com/index.php?ref=sarathi1234
Follow the easy steps...
Step 1: Click the Register
Step 2; Enter your username (Eg.john12)
Step 3: Enter your Password
Step 4: Enter your verify Password
Step 5; Enter your name (Eg.John Williams)
Step 6; Enter your valid E-mail id
Step 7; Enter your Country (Eg.INDIA)
Step 8; select your I accept the Terms of Service (ANS: Yes I Accept)
Step 9: Finaly Click the Create Account
Once again you will go to Login...
1. Enter your Username
2. Enter your Password after
3. Click the "Surf Ads" Menu
4. clike the Ads
5. Get the $1.00 per Click
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]