Advance Fee Scams Are Based On Greed, So Their New Favorite Target? Lawyers!
from the first-thing,-we... dept
While the "classic" Nigerian 419 "advance fee" scam was based on telling someone they had been awarded/won millions of dollars, which is just held up by bureaucratic problems, a popular variation that's been around for years is buying something online with a bogus check written for significantly more than the amount sold. This scam hit eBay users pretty hard for a while. Basically, it relies on a fundamental misunderstanding of how check processing works. As an example, a check for $10,000 is sent on an item that only costs $2,000, with the buyer asking the seller to send back a check for the difference along with the product. The seller deposits the check and a few days later the bank says that the check "cleared." Banks have to clear the checks in a short period of time. Then the buyer sends off the product and the excess money... only to find out a few days (usually about a week or so) later, that the check is a forgery and the money is gone (along with the product and the legitimate "difference" check that was sent out).The real issue here is that banks say the check "cleared" which people assume means that the check is legit. But it's not. Fix this problem and this particular scam would disappear overnight.
Of course, most of these scams are based on playing on someone's greed. To brush aside anyone's concerns on these types of deals, sometimes the buyer will ask for only some of the difference back, making the seller think they actually got away with making more money.
But, if you're going to base on a scam on greed, why prey just on small-fry eBay sellers? Why not go after the bigger dogs... like lawyers? You might assume that lawyers would be more sophisticated and not as quick to fall for this sort of thing, but at least with some (and, no, I'm not painting all lawyers with this brush), you'd be wrong. Earlier this year, we wrote about a lawyer who fell for exactly this trick... and then (of course) sued Citibank for letting him make this mistake -- which cost his firm nearly $200,000. Not bad for a simple scam... and thus, it appears that more lawyers are being targeted with just such a scam, even to the point that local bar associations are warning lawyers to watch out for it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advance fee, lawyers, scams
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This can't be emphasized enough. The only reason advanced fee check cashing scams work is because our banking system is broken, and there is no reason, no excuse now that the banks have succsesfully gotten the Check 21 Act passed, legislation that means that banks process checks electronically and not by sending physical paper checks to one another to reconcile.
Meanwhile, if a customer does try and check out a check with the bank ahead of time to make sure it is legit the banks may have the customer--the intended victim--arrested, as Bank of America did to Matthew Shinnick:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/30/BUGTGKRHSF1.DTL
Banks can fix this problem and should, but they don't because it would mean changing the status quo and taking responsibility for their own actions. If you want to talk about how advanced fee scams exist because of greed, start with the people who have the power to stop the schemes in their tracks and refuse to do so: the banks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If that can't be done in the same day, let alone instantly, they're still doing something wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Of course it *can* be done, but the banks don't *want* to do it. They make quite a bit of money each year on returned check fees. You think they want to give that up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know what they say
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You know what they say
My first inclination is to agree with you; lawyers and all, but I have to say, when a bank says a check is good, and me, not being privy to the wiles of the banking industry, would tend to believe the bank. This crap is really on the banks. There's no reason to think that a lawyer would have any more inside knowledge on how banks operate than anyone else. That said, it refreshing to see rats feeding on other rats for a change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
if the banks didn't lie....
Personally I think that banks should have to eat the costs of ever check they call cleared that isn't. They shouldn't tell you it is if it isn't. And don't tell me that it's a problem with technology, otherwise the Ukrops around the corner wouldn't be able to clear the money from my checking (Using a physical check) while I was standing in line and then give me the voided check back before I leave the store.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: if the banks didn't lie....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds like time for a little 'gaming the system' as payback
What? The charges weren't validated after the police hauled him out of the bank in handcuffs, confiscated his personal and work computers, and conducted extensive interviews with all of his business associates.
Oops, must have been a mistake, good thing there are no repercussions for reporting a 'suspected crime'. Too bad it may have ruined someone's life, but at least we are following the rules, right?
On another note Reynolds Wrap brand foil makes the best tinfoil hats ever. Disclosure: I once received a free box of Reynolds Warp foil from the company, so my views may be a little biased.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sounds like time for a little 'gaming the system' as payback
It doesn't work that way. The name of the game is "selective enforcement".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's kinda amazing
Bank A:
"Hey I got a check #, routing #, and account. It's for $1.99. That account have the money in it?"
Bank B:
"Yeah, it's O.K. to send that check. The money is here."
Then that night the accounting is done and funds are 'transfered'. That's called 'clearing' and it's always held that meaning. All transactions happen like this. It's a paradigm of trust that allows banking to work at all the way most people like it to. Without this trust electronic banking cannot happen, no debit cards, no credit cards, and checks would take days to clear with Check21 and weeks without it. The entire banking system would collapse and people would all go back to cash.
Now HERE'S where the scam comes in.... The account holder reviews the check record and reports the check as a fraud. The accounting is reversed and the money is transfered back. Check21 and electronic banking is a soft patch that allows this abuse of trust, this fraud, to get detected faster for the larger accounts-holders, reducing it's impact by getting a fraud return processed in just a day. The scam isn't in a clearing time error, but in the difference between clearing and detecting a fraud.
You want a real screaming nightmare, investigate how banks "generate wealth". It's two guys passing a dollar back and forth and every time they do, a dime falls unto the floor. Where does the dime come from? They IMAGINE it into being real.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scams
I was very lucky in that I was watching the account due to a large check I had outstanding and immediately noticed the strange check #'s that showed up. In the subsequent weeks of dealing with the fraud department of BofA, I was flabbergasted in the archaic way that banks handle things.. I had to call the credit agencies (Experian and equifax come to mind) and argue with them, trying to tell the idiots that the account was closed and DO NOT TAKE MY CHECKS...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Check?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Check?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So what happened...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SCAM JOURNAL - ijcaonline.org
International Journal of Computer Applications
ijcaonline.org
The best place to publish nonsensical papers!!!
Papers published by IJCA have no recognition in most Universities!!
Blacklisted by several universities in Europe, US and Asia!!
International Journal of Computer Applications
ijcaonline.org
a SCAM JOURNAL!!! BEWARE!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]