Another Example Of Copyright Law Gone Mad: Series Of Lawsuits Over Telephone Jingle

from the make-it-stop dept

Fri, Nov 13th 2009 11:33am — Mike Masnick

This one's from a few months back, but still quite interesting. Danny submitted this story of a series of lawsuits between a musician and a town tourism board over a song the singer apparently wrote. The backstory is that the musician, Cheryl Janky, was a member of a doo wop band called Stormy Weather (perhaps that should have been a warning), who had, as a founder and singer, a guy named Henry Farag. Janky wrote a song called "Wonders of Indiana." With Farag's help, the song was modified to become "Lake County, Indiana," "a doo-wop ode to the border county that rhymes 'ethnic diversity' with 'Hoosier hospitality.'" Farag then did a deal with the tourism board of Lake County, who bought 1,500 copies of the band's CD to sell in its gift shop, and used the song as hold music for callers. The tourism board also had the band (with Janky in it) perform at the opening of of the tourism board's new center. That all happened in 1999.

In 2003, however, Janky left the band, and suddenly was pissed off about how "her" song was being used. She filed a lawsuit in 2003, and since then:

The case has spawned at least three lawsuits, thousands of dollars in judge-ordered sanctions against the woman's attorneys, a three-day trial, estimated legal fees of more than $500,000, reams of paperwork and a subpoena issued to a federal judge.

And for what? Farag notes that the band sold less than 2,000 CDs total (most of which seem to be from the tourism board's purchase). And yet, Janky continues to pursue the case, with her lawyer insisting she needs to do this to "stand up for her creative rights." Meanwhile, this is the same lawyer who apparently "has been sanctioned twice by separate judges in the case for filing frivolous claims and last month was ordered to put down a $5,000 deposit before filing more lawsuits on Janky's behalf 'to cover the high probability of additional sanctions.'"

Ah, the crazy things that a misunderstanding of copyright makes people do.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, jingle, music

14 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 13 Nov 2009 @ 11:46am

You can easily substitute many terms for "copyright" and make the same point.

While this case perhaps is in the context of copyright law, cases of this type are seen all the time, cases brought by people with a somewhat out-of-the-norm view of what constitutes "justice".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Nov 2009 @ 12:26pm

It isn't copyright - it's just someone abusing the legal system period. They probably would do the samething over someone letting their dog crap on their yard. Nice shot to try to ding copyright, but it's not really about the good or the bad of copyright.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Justin, 13 Nov 2009 @ 12:39pm

Sounds smart to me
This sounds like a smart lawsuit to me, 2,000 CDs at maybe $10, I'll assume there was a small check for the call hold music and a few other little things. Overall I will be very generous in guessing this deal was worth $50,000, So how does she think its a good idea to go rack up a $500,000+ trial bill? This is a great business plan.

Maybe when people like this pull a stunt that seems to only be for publicity their name should be left out of the article. Kinda like how the TV stations do not show a fan who runs on the field at a ball game.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ima Fish (profile), 13 Nov 2009 @ 12:41pm

I can't find a PDF of it anywhere, but the case is Janky v. Lake County Convention And Visitors Bureau, 576 F.3d 356 C.A.7 (Ind. August 03, 2009).

It's a hilarious read.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shawn (profile), 13 Nov 2009 @ 1:06pm

Re:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/072350p.pdf

And it is a very good read indeed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shawn (profile), 13 Nov 2009 @ 1:09pm

Re: Sounds smart to me
they (the band) provided the song to the tourism board for the cost of production. She actually got a $100,000 summary judgment that was overturned on appeal
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MAC, 13 Nov 2009 @ 1:16pm

Doo Wopper...
Gee, maybe if we reform the law to require the loosing lawyer put up half of the court costs along with the plaintiff putting up the other half the losers would be a lot less inclined to launch a 'questionable' law suit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
davebarnes (profile), 13 Nov 2009 @ 1:36pm

Grammar Nazi Alert
"the band sold less than 2,000 CDs"
fewer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ima Fish (profile), 13 Nov 2009 @ 1:38pm

Re: Re:
Thanks!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Nov 2009 @ 1:44pm

Wish I could
Lake County...Nice area if you like dying.
I wish I could sue her for my portion of taxpayer dollars being blown on this crap.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ima Fish (profile), 13 Nov 2009 @ 1:53pm

Re: Wish I could
Nice area if you like dying.

Michigan has a trademark on being a place to die!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Nov 2009 @ 6:04pm

Let's just say that I wanted to hire a band to play at a wedding, some other life event. The first thing I'll do is Google the name of the band and/or the individual singer. I'm sure most people would do the same thing, if only to get a sucks/doesn't suck opinion from people who had prior experience with the band.

After doing a Google search, I'd never hire someone like Cheryl Janky, either for a one-time event or as a permanent employee, because as soon as she gets pissed off enough about something, she'll trip and fall and start filing lawsuits all over the place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Nov 2009 @ 9:52pm

Re: Grammar Nazi Alert
There is nothing incorrect with the grammar in that statement. Mathematically, 'fewer than' is not a statement.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John85851 (profile), 15 Nov 2009 @ 12:14pm

It's mine and I want it back
Yet again, this case isn't about copyright as much as it's about "I helped make that thing, I'm claiming that it's mine, and I want it back".

I agree that the legal system should be reformed so the losing side has to pay some kind of damages for wasting the court's time. Otherwise, there's no reason *not* to file a frivolous law suit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]