Jury Says Fictional Character Can Be Libelous
from the that-doesn't-seem-right dept
Plenty of fiction authors base their characters on real life people. But, perhaps they need to be more careful. A jury has ruled in favor of someone who claimed libel against an author for supposedly writing a character "inspired by" a former friend. That former friend was not happy about the portrayal, in which she was a "sexually promiscuous alcoholic." This seems like a really bad precedent. Fiction authors quite frequently take people from real life, but then exaggerate them to extremes. But if that opens them up to potential libel charges, that seems quite ridiculous.For example, I once read a book that had a character that was based on my father, written by someone who knew him many, many years ago (in the copy the author sent my father, it was inscribed with my father's name, followed by the character's name in parentheses). It was entertaining, to me, to see such a character who certainly resembled the rather content, laid back, unflappable nature of my Dad... except at the end where the character went crazy and had to be locked up. That, clearly, did not happen in real life, but it never struck me as "libelous." It was obviously just a fictional story, where the author needed the character to do something and act in a certain way. That's why it's fiction. Besides, for it to be defamatory, you have to be able to show the harm caused, and that's only going to happen if a lot of people know that the character is supposed to be the real person, which seems unlikely in most cases. In the meantime, though, if you're writing a fictional story, be careful who you base your characters on.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: characters, defamation, fiction, libel
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Other precedent?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
$100,000?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
People need to learn that suing can't get content to "disappear" , it does the exact opposite.
Known now as "Streisand effect" XD
$100,000 vs. ruined reputation and no employment prospects...
+ most of the money is probably in the lawyers pockets.
The character did not have her name, so if she just kept quiet no one would have known.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It is more like by filing this suit she admitted that she is a "sexually promiscuous alcoholic". This should get bounced on appeal as long as the author didn't clearly link the fictional character to the real life individual.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Or .....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What about...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
"Hey, hey, hey. Check it. I'm gonna (let you finish) write this story and you drum up all kinds of noise pretending you're pissed about how this one character is like you, but is bad so everyone will think you're bad too. Yeah, yeah, and then you pretend to sue me and we'll get our names in the news and people will buy my book to read about your character. It'll be rightous!"
That's what I think is really going on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Libel Per Se
[ link to this | view in thread ]
cat is out of the bag
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How to write fiction advice
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That the judge didn't do that is suspicious to me... I mean, anyone with a brain knows that if this gets to the federal courts, it WILL be overturned.
Judge could have saved us all a lot of time and money by simply throwing the case out and forbidding the case from being appealed (which, they can do in civil cases, though exceptionally rarely).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
the truth hurts
anyone see the sheer stupiidyt of Intellectual property mentally challenged ( retards ) yet
[ link to this | view in thread ]
no one can write ANYTHING NOW
STUPID sad dumb and unenforceable at large rulings make for more dissent in law and of law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
BTW, libel law and intellectual property bear no relationship.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fictionalization
And I wonder -- does anyone really believe disclaimers?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
life imitating art
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
But if she really IS a orimiscuous alcoholic then the author has TRUTH on their side and there's no libel...
[ link to this | view in thread ]