Yes, MySpace Is Allowed To Delete MySpace Page That Tries To Show Fake And Real MySpace Celebs
from the nice-try dept
Last year, we wrote about a case brought by a woman named Julie Riggs against MySpace. The complaint itself is somewhat of an amusing read ("At this point Plaintiff was literally seething with anger to the point that she was now consumed by it"). The main issue was that Riggs had created a website that tried to determine which celebrity profiles on MySpace were real and which were fake. She was upset (among other things) because (1) there were fake profiles on MySpace (2) MySpace later did something similar itself and (3) MySpace deleted her profile. After we wrote about the case, we received an angry email from Ms. Riggs telling us we "missed the point" and that MySpace "stole" her idea -- and that we needed to get our story straight. She never explains how coming up with the same idea is illegal, of course. Also, my favorite: "What can you expect from site such as yours though." Indeed.Unfortunately, it appears that the district court also "missed the point" and did not get the story straight, because as Eric Goldman points out, it has dismissed the lawsuit. However, in this case, it may actually be true that the court missed the point. As Goldman notes in his discussion of the ruling, the court seems a bit confused about how Section 230 of the CDA works, and may have dismissed parts of the case for rather confused reasons. Riggs has appealed, so hopefully the Appeals Court fixes the problems (but still dismisses it). However, again as Goldman notes, this is taking place in the notoriously nutty Ninth Circuit, which often has a problem with reading Section 230 the way everyone else reads Section 230. Hopefully, they get this one right.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: deleting, julie riggs, terms of service
Companies: myspace
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Did she create a separate website or just a myspace page ?
I can see myspace taking down any page is does not like, but they will have a more dificult time taking down a separate website not within their perview.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another "smart - dumb" deal there Mike? The Ninth Circuit is known for looking at things with a broader eye, and often turns up interesting judgements that carefully read the laws. I am sure if they were being "nutty" about extending fair use like that other judge you wrote about, they would be your best buddies.
How slanted can you get?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: smart - dumb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: smart - dumb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm hoping you will do a follow up when the Ninth Circuit releases the Opinion. You have no idea what the evidence is on record, but Mr. Goldman does have a copy of my brief. Why do you think he said they may do something crazy? I guess you would have to read the brief to understand. He chose only to review the District Court's Decision at this time since the Ninth Circuit has not read the brief yet. He didn't even mention the celebrity site, which was solely dismissed because the Judge overlooked a paragraph in the Amended Complaint. I can pretty much guarantee you that claim will be reversed. It's undisputed that paragraph exists with that needed element.
Please research breach of implied in fact contracts. Why don't you actually go onto the PACER system and look at the docket. There are phone records and letters in the evidence detailing the idea of MySpace Celebrity.
Before making your uninformed opinion about my case, do a little research on your own. Don't always believe Mr. Goldman's viewpoint is the Gospel. There is a very good chance this case is getting reversed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seething with Anger
She didn't win this case; I predict she never will and she definitely does not win any support for the news community at large. Good Luck Mike she'll probably beat this like the dead horse it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Post Aye?
I never wanted to be involved in a public lawsuit. However, if you're going to criticize me, I have every right to defend myself. And btw, I know exactly who you are "Cyber News Desk". If people talk negatively about a person in public, a rebuttal should be expected.
I'm not a nasty person at all. Like you or Mike really know me? I don't believe if I were a nasty person that I would have had the opportunity to communicate with the celebrities that were on my site, some of whom I still speak with. I only wish I could make some of the emails from them public, but that would be a breach of confidence.
I guess we'll see what the Ninth Circuit decides. Maybe Cyber will have another shot at writing a more "balanced piece".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fake page
[ link to this | view in chronology ]