FCC Hires Law Professor Who Believes Broadcast Indecency Laws Are Unconstitutional
from the that-seems-like-a-good-thing dept
There are many people out there who are greatly troubled by the way the FCC "enforces" efforts against broadcast indecency -- with some even questioning whether or not it's even constitutional for the FCC to act as a public arbiter of indecency. It looks like the FCC has just hired one such person, in the form of Duke telco law professor Stuart Benjamin. Since I consider myself among those who question how indecency fines can fit with a First Amendment, this seems like a good thing -- but the reporting on it, at the link above, only focuses on the complaints about this hire. But the complaint comes from the Parents Television Council, whose main claim to fame is flooding the FCC with bogus complaints about "indecent" programming from people who didn't even see whatever it is they're complaining about. So you can understand why they might complain. If they lose the ability to create moral panics, it's harder to keep going.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, indecency, legality, stuart benjamin
Companies: fcc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FUD
But "won’t someone think of the children"
{/Sarcasm}
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: FUD
I'm thinking that I'm going to parent my children and determine what's proper for them to watch, not some jackasses with too much time on their hands and a hard-on for censoring things they're ashamed of watching.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
... Oh crap, remember "change" last time?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Unknowing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The PG13/R dividing line would mean no "Saving Private Ryan", but "Red Dawn(1984)" would be okay.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
the point
More to the point, they will group those kinds of shows with others on channels where they can be viewed by those that like them, while more "decent" shows are grouped with other "decent" shows - where people that don't like the "indecent" shows can watch stuff they do like.
You know, the free market - where sellers respond to their customers? So, as a customer, vote with your feet - watch stuff you like and turn off stuff you don't - and keep your kids away from stuff you think is bad for them. There ARE tools for that.
One of those tools is parental authority, and is not easy to learn, but once mastered, is a very effective one. More people should try.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What is wrong and what is right.
When the government decides you don't have the right to watch something then its their choice.
Is simple, people want to live in a world were other dictate what is better for them or they would like to live in a world that they can choose a path?
Most people that want this to be passed to the government are opening the door to others things to come down the road it won't stop with lewd language it will become a weapon of suppression.
ps: The people in favor are probably the ones that can't stand other peoples choices.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Unknowing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's hard for me to picture Yoda actually saying that with a straight face.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Unknowing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How do I impose my standards on a live event?
Say I want to sit down with my 13 year-old daughter and watch the AMA awards. Say I don't feel its appropriate for my 13YO to view simulated sex acts. Or say we are watching the Super Bowl halftime show because dad's a football nut and I really don't want her to see Janet Jackson's pierced nipple (yes, I know in real time you could barely see anything). Once the guidelines are gone, anything will be fair game.
This is not a troll question, but legitimately, how do I as a parent, impose "my" standards on these events when there are no guidelines? Sure I can Tivo them. How many people are going to Tivo every live event? At that point advertising dollars shrink as more "concerned" parents have to Tivo to protect their kids. Once Tivo'd, I'm skipping every commercial there is.
At least with recorded material, I can see the rating before hand and make appropriate choices. Or even set the TV to block inappropriate material.
I'm all for putting choice back in the hands of the consumer, but at least give me some tools to help me where I don't have to watch every single live event that comes on TV just because my daughter might be in the room!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How do I impose my standards on a live event?
Also, what happens to a 13 year old girl when she sees "simulated sex acts" that is so harmful? You might have to talk about sex. I know, scary, right? Most middle/high schoolers (as was mentioned above) know a good deal about that subject already. It's everywhere. You simply *can't* hide her from it. The only way to protect your child is to arm her with a working brain and the knowledge of potential consequences.
Disclaimer: I have no children at the time of writing this comment. Maybe that will change my mind, but I seriously doubt it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Parents
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How do I impose my standards on a live event?
The ONLY way to protect kids from inappropriate content is to arm them with values and standards to begin with. Teach them what is right and wrong and WHY it is right or wrong.
Once they get into puberty you've lost them anyway if you've not done it till now, so trying to keep that inappropriate content away from that 13 year old is like trying to keep a bird from flying.
But if you've pre-immunized them by instilling them with values and standards, any such bad content will not matter - they'll laugh and titter over the funny stuff and roll their eyes and change the channel when they run into stuff they know violates those standards - all by themselves, without your input. They'll do it of their own volition, too, even if you are not there.
Or if they watch it anyway, it won't harm them, because they now know better, because you taught them right from wrong.
If you don't trust that 13 year old by now - its too late and you've missed the boat!
The whole point here is - it is YOUR place to set the standards for your family - not the government, because the guys in government that set the rules more than likely will never meet your standards.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How do I impose my standards on a live event?
The entertainment industry REALLY doesn't want that to be the answer, I'm sure, so if the FCC stops regulating this stuff I imagine they'll come up with a voluntary system.
* it's my business as a parent what I want my kids to be exposed to, not yours to tell me I have to let them see anything and everything that's out there
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: How do I impose my standards on a live event?
Of course, content providers will have a voluntary system of ratings, the market, unregulated as to content type, will begin to demand such a system, for just the reason you mention.
It's easy, and best of all, isn't an imposed restriction based upon a false sense of some mythical national moral standard, which usually works out to be based upon something cooked up by the religious right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: How do I impose my standards on a live event?
how do I do that with a live event if there are no broadcast standards?
Dare I ask, sir or ma'am, how you manage to take your sweet little snowflake outside, into the real world? There could be nipples out there! Oh, the horror! What? You're only concerned about female nipples? Well, that's certainly strange. You weren't too concerned when your child was an infant.
The fact that the infamous nipple occurred in the middle of a sporting even in which large men bash into each other astounds me. No one seemed to care about 2 hours of violence but half a second of a body part *everyone* has and shit hits the fan?? I really don't understand. No sarcasm, I'm very, very confused. If you have time, please explain.
Even cartoons are violent. Unless Ninjas (Teenage/Mutant or otherwise) have a different job than I thought they did, that's violence. Where is the moral panic?
Humans are a strange species, for sure.
The bottom line: As you said, the networks will self regulate to keep the an-ounce-of-ignorance-is-worth-a-pound-of-education type parents happy and watching the ads. We really don't need the government to do it for us.
I, however, know that a boob has never ruined a child, but parent who over-sheltered a child has.
Sorry for the rant.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seems fairly god damned direct and to the fucking point.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
and do you really want your child being exposed to the violence in a movie like saving private Ryan at 8 years old or so? I would say there are similarities in what most people would deem appropriate for an 8 year old.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How do I impose my standards on a live event?
Record it on a DVR, watch it first, then decide to let your children watch it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]