eMusic: Prices Went Up, But Artists Aren't Seeing Any Of That Cash
from the it-all-goes-to-Sony? dept
You may recall quite a lot of attention paid last summer to eMusic's decision to raise prices at the exact same time that it added its first major label music (from Sony Music) to its service. This, understandably, pissed off a lot of people. Many people used eMusic because it focused on indie artists rather than the majors, and to find out that their prices were being jacked up to accommodate a major just didn't seem right. Of course, eMusic tried to claim that this was a "good thing" and also (har har) that the price increase had nothing to do with Sony. Even if true, announcing the two together was obviously a mistake. Of course, eMusic kept making things worse and worse by censoring critics (and then lying about doing so) while also quietly taking away features without letting people know. The whole thing was a mess.Of course, if eMusic is charging more, you might think that at least the musicians who use the service are getting paid more. Think again. Musicians on eMusic are upset to discover that despite the price increase, they're still making the same amount. So now, not only has eMusic pissed off its users, but also musicians as well. At least Sony Music is happy.
This is really too bad. eMusic was a leader in offering DRM-free music, as well as a major supporter of independent music early on. It also had a reputation for being consumer-friendly and accessible to both customers and musicians. I guess all that is going out the window, though.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
*sigh*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
As did iTunes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No surprise
They grandfathered in their existing customers, but tried very hard to get us to switch to the new plan by asking us to "upgrade" our accounts. There was absolutely no value added with the new pricing, and it was purely a downgrade, yet we got fairly heavy pressure to agree to the new pricing.
I canceled my account a while ago, after the genre of music that I prefer got completely overrun by trash masquerading ad substance.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They believe in the money lobbied to them and in politics, isn't that the most imporatant part?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
BOYCOTT TO HELL AND BEYOND!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Give it a break Mike
Mike seems to have a personal grudge against emusic and has posted article after article* attacking them, most of which rely on the weakest conjecture and misrepresentation of facts.
* Well no, they aren't articles, it's a personal blog with pretensions of being a genuine news outlet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The price was also right for experimentation - paying €2 or €3 for an album that turns out to be mediocre doesn't hurt if there's even one great track. Best of all, the music was DRM-free and I could be reasonably sure that most of my money was going nowhere near the RIAA and its cronies, whose tactics I despised. During those years, I spent more money on recorded music than ever before, or since - at least €30/month, often more.
However, things went quickly downhill after the Sony acquisition. The prices skyrocketed for all users, yet the Sony catalogue was unavailable outside the US. Users outside of Europe and North America were also blocked from opening new accounts. American users also got download caps so that most albums would never cost more than 12 credits, yet everyone else had to pay 1 credit/track - making some albums 3 or 4 times more expensive (and in some cases more expensive than the CD). They also introduced download caps - rather than re-downloading any song you've bought as many times as you need, you can only download a few times (they never truly specified how many).
So, almost overnight, users were charged much more to get much less from the service. I stuck around for a while, but even after downgrading my account from 100 tracks/month to just 12, I felt I was paying too much for the service there. Is this all Sony's fault? Probably not, but it can hardly be a coincidence that such anti-customer changes took place at the same time their catalogue was acquired. It's no secret that the major labels demand higher licensing fees and more restrictions for content, and since most of the indies involved didn't seem happy at the changes, we have to point the finger at either Sony or bad management.
Luckily, sites like AmieStreet and Jamendo still exist for my non-RIAA music fixes (although the former has an annoying habit of advertising new albums to me that I'm not allowed to buy - thanks regional idiocy!). For albums not available there, CDs are usually cheaper than eMusic's current prices if you wait a few months, and come with all the fair use rights that digital stores take away.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Looking elsewhere
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lesson to all other services for indies
Do not make deals with them. Let them suffer as much as possible and stick to the indie roots that make you awesome.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Give it a break Mike
This has been said previously on many occasions. Techdirt is not a news outlet, and has never claimed to be. I recall previous posts from Mike that clearly say that he is not reporting news, but that he is giving us his opinion on topics.
"Did you even read the original article in it's entirety? It's pretty clear that the money isn't going to Sony."
I did read the original article, and I have to say that there is money going to Sony Music. How else do you think eMusic was able to license Sony's music library? With kind words? Maybe candy? A one-time payment that gives them permanent access to the Sony Music library? Without knowing any of the particulars of the deal, I'd bet that Sony would insist on continuing payments to keep the Sony library available.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Give it a break Mike
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Give it a break Mike
Your original post was a little vague on that "from the increased subscriptions" part. You said "It's pretty clear that the money isn't going to Sony." Which did not specify the money from the increased subscriptions. Now your being more specific, and as such yes there are more reasonable explanations. I was actually trying to be sarcastic with the part you quoted, sorry if you didn't catch that.
"Is the extra money going straight into the pockets of Sony? Mike says yes, "
Where does Mike say it is? The only spot I see would be "At least Sony Music is happy." Well, they're still getting their license payments according to their contracts so why wouldn't they be happy. After that Sony isn't even mentioned. Unless you can point to much more specific quote from Mike, I think your seeing opinions that aren't there.
"...in the imaginations of a few disgruntled ex-customers."
Actually, I've never used eMusic. I prefer streaming services, or listening to a radio stations web feed. Again I was trying to be sarcastic with that part of my post. Next time I'll make sure to include a sarcasm tag for you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I've found a lot of good music there [in the past], but anymore, it's like there is NO quality control in their catalog. The back door is open and they take in any and all pap.
Maybe it's just the newness of a different catalog, but I can't go more than 5 clicks into AmieStreet before I want to buy something. I can literally slog thru 100 pages at eMusic and not want to download anything... I've quit looking and am only holding my membership open, and at a reduced level, util I clear out my wish list.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I have a better one ...
Like all web sites dealing with the record labels ... eMusic will get spanked and fail due to contacts and pressure from the record labels.
Learn from history and you wont repeat it
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
No dont boycott .... enjoy the moment!!!
Watch as things begin failing for the record labels. Evolution occurs, things change. I believe the words "We the people". We choose to listen to indie artists, we choose to ignore the artists forced upon us by the labels, we choose to listen to what we want to when we want to. It isnt piracy thats killing the record labels, its choice. We leave them because there is a choice. That is what the labels cant prevent... Choice...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Customer since 2004; ready to leave
[ link to this | view in thread ]