Don't Buy Into Any Reports On Q4 Online Ad Revenue Just Yet
from the flushed-out dept
In the last month or so, we heard a few different reports making the rounds claiming that "online advertising is back!" after lots of companies had great fourth quarters when it came to online ad revenues. The latest to report such a thing is the NY Times, who saw a big boost in online ad revenues in the fourth quarter, leading a bunch of people to wonder if maybe online ad revenue is taking off in a big way. While advertising has always been a cyclical market, and will certainly continue to grow, I think people are overreacting to Q4 of 2009.Frankly, we saw the same thing here. While we don't rely on ad revenue as the core of our business model, we do make money on advertising, and we had a great fourth quarter on that front, as advertisers were pumping tons of money into ads. But I don't think it's a sign of anything to get too excited about -- and that's because a lot of companies were really skittish earlier in the year, so I think a large chunk of Q4 online ad spending was a mirage. Here's why:
The economy took a nosedive in the fourth quarter of 2008. By that point, lots of companies had already set their 2009 ad budgets, and had committed to at least a decent portion of what they planned to spend in Q1 of 2009. However, once the credit crunch went into overdrive, and there was all sorts of talk about how the world economy might collapse and we'd all be living in a post-apocalyptic Mad Maxian world, lots of companies hit the brakes, and didn't want to commit to spending. A bunch of companies simply stopped spending on online advertising until they knew what was going on. Then, along came Q3, and suddenly the marketing VPs and directors realized they were approaching the end of the year, and still had huge chunks of money that had been budgeted in 2008 for 2009, but hadn't been spent. And the way lots of companies do budgeting is that, if you haven't spent it, you get less the next year. So, these marketing folks had to quickly spend the budgets they had meant to spread out over the entire year, and they dumped a bunch of it into online advertising, because it was quick and easy.
So, I don't think that any of the Q4 reports you hear about concerning online advertising should be considered as an indicator of very much in terms of the future.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ad revenue
Companies: ny times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Yes
Of course, its never a good idea to leave an excess of funds in the budget, if the business unit and line managers have remote hopes of getting the same or better budget the next year.
It's The Ostrich Effect
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ads requiring me to react
These ads are not only irritating but they require me to click something which I really have no idea what the click will do; install a virus or other unwanted software on my computer? I know one person will have no effect in this but I am hoping there are others who feel the same and will also vote their irritation with such dangerous practices.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Q4 up 50%
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ads requiring me to react
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Christmas. Always a good time for advertising.
Plenty of new phones and gadgets that got major media coverage. I seem to remember Techdirt not just having ads, but just about being skinned not once but twice.
Plenty of companies coming out of the recession period attmepting to buy business at the year end, when people are typically spending. That includes in the B2B area, where all companies are working to set their 2010 budgets.
Q4 may be more about companies who didn't advertise in the previous quarters and kept their ad dollars to make the most impact at a given time.
You don't know, and I don't know. We can guess, but all they are are guesses.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Right. Just to clarify, I assumed that was obvious. Q4 is ALWAYS the best quarter for advertising by a long shot. But the point of the discussion (and I apologize if this wasn't clear) was that it was massively better than previous years for almost everyone I spoke to. It wasn't the normal Q4 bump.
You don't know, and I don't know. We can guess, but all they are are guesses.
Or, um, we can talk to our advertisers. You know. And they might tell us. As they did.
So, there's that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Damn, you are powerful and well connected.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Not really. More and more companies are saying that they've seen online ad spending as being more effective. Plus it's faster and easier to set up and run -- so it made sense as part of the end of the year rush.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Success!
The demo can be seen here: http://www.zedo.com/demos/ZEDOAdMagic.html
Keep up the great work everyone! Cheers,
Liz@zedo.com
Marketing Manager
[ link to this | view in thread ]