The Future Of Print: Better Connect With Your Audience
from the it-ain't-one-way-any-more dept
Kevin Yank sends over an interview he recently did with Derek Powazek who, among other things, developed one of the first truly cool online publications in Fray, and also JPG Magazine, discussing the future of print. Powazek makes a point that we've tried to make here in the past, but weren't able to highlight as clearly as he does:And the other crazy thing we found when we were doing JPG is that by far, the majority of our subscribers were people who did not subscribe to any other magazines. I thought that was weird. Like, you'd think, "Okay, maybe the people who like print would buy it." But what we learned was it was the people who felt involved in the creation of it who were buying it. The people who were submitting their photos, voting on other people's photos, who felt involved in the community were the ones buying it.Exactly. We've discussed in the past how much the community now wants to be a part of the news process, whether it's helping out with some aspect of reporting or (more frequently) in spreading the news, sharing the news and offering commentary on the news. But that's not the way the old school publishers think. They still think of themselves as being part of an ivory tower of sorts, where they deliver "the word" from on high. But that doesn't create any connection with the community.
So I think there's a real opportunity here for media makers to learn from this to say, "Well maybe the reason why people aren't buying newspapers and magazines is because they feel completely disconnected from the product, right? Because the old style of journalism was sit down, shut up and consume what we say. And in a world of collaborative media where everybody can participate online, everybody can make content, maybe what these media organizations need to do is tear down the walls a little bit and let people feel involved in the making of it, and then they'll buy the product.
And that's a disaster for a publication -- since it's always really been about bringing together a community, and then trying to monetize the attention of that community. But by actually involving the community, inviting them in, and making them feel a part of the process creates amazing connections that create people who are loyal to publications. It's something that a lot of old school publications really need to understand. And, if they did, they'd quickly realize that a concept like a paywall pretty much destroys that relationship.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: derek powazek, future, magazines, print
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Migrating a community to Apps or Migrating Content to Apps to Create Community. Which is easier?
You'll have to be in front of a computer to comment, whereas with iPad, the level of effort to consume content is lower, thereby eliminating barriers-to-entry for customers to post their own thought-of-the-moment.
Blogs will be handicapped by this because their primary commentary will come from people primarily behind a computer keyboard. The thing is, that the medium for content consumption is changing right before Mike's eyes.
Also, iPad app functionality is better/easier consumed because of it offers more formatting capability. Web also has additional prerequisites such as network latency, etc.
It's a win-win for everyone-- Mike gets fewer comments from jerks because the jerks can comment on stories that actually interest them.
Blogs that don't migrate or don't see the steamroller coming will be stuck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Migrating a community to Apps or Migrating Content to Apps to Create Community. Which is easier?
You lost me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Migrating a community to Apps or Migrating Content to Apps to Create Community. Which is easier?
Did I miss any?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Migrating a community to Apps or Migrating Content to Apps to Create Community. Which is easier?
I access all of my content on a computational device. Not the radio. Not the television. Not the newspaper.
On a computational device. It's like a fancy calculator!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Migrating a community to Apps or Migrating Content to Apps to Create Community. Which is easier?
The iPad will have the exact opposite effect that you seem to think it will. Google currently has redone "reader" the RSS aggregator to be more iPad friendly. There are dozens if not hundreds of RSS feed readers for the iPhone. With how simple it is to convert iPhone to iPad apps you will see alot of them be converted for use on the iPad.
Custom news, news of interest to the individual, news sent by friends, news links from people you follow because you respect their opinions, these are the future of the news industry. The iPad will accelerate this trend leading to quicker demise of the general information news papers.
"Blogs will be handicapped by this because their primary commentary will come from people primarily behind a computer keyboard."
You have obviously never touched an iPad. It has an on screen keyboard that can be used two thumbed blackberry style or as a normal keyboard. Just turn it sideways.
"Blogs that don't migrate or don't see the steamroller coming will be stuck." ... let me rewite that for you ...
newspapers that dont see the change in reading habits of their readers, that dont target a specific niche, and dont create a sense of community will be steamrolled as flat as a offset printing plate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Migrating a community to Apps or Migrating Content to Apps to Create Community. Which is easier?
Yes, the apps are cool and an important part of the attraction of these devices, but mobile-friendly websites are even better (e.g. the m.cricinfo.com site is great, so it doesn't matter that the cricinfo app is truly rubbish).
Things like the iPhone even let you link a site from the main page of the phone as if it was an app.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't read a news source for the comments
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't read a news source for the comments
And if you have OCD and are a horder, until your house is filled floor to ceiling with newspapers... ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The hardest thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now, as I have said, that benefit is only slight. Is it enough of a reason to buy? I know it really pisses me off when I go to a site like Ars and see grade-school errors in a 300 word "article" alongside about half a dozen ads.
Ads and typographical errors should be mutually exclusive in any publication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The newspapers consider themselves the investigators, the professionals, the experts, and the true source for news. The main types of news are political rhetoric dressed up as news, meant to steer the public in one direction or another. Rehashed press releases designed to place an entity (corp, pol, etc) in a favorable light. Rewrites of other papers and bloggers stories used as fillers or cost saving methods.
For all of these types of stories it is very difficult for a news paper to open up their web site to comment and community building. The internet at large acts as a fact checker, it points out flaws in stories, and it shines a light on untruths, and it shows the other side of the story. All the things that make people realize that discussion trumps being spoon fed information, that multiple sources for news gives you a better understanding of the world, that the news papers are biased in one direction politically or another.
The existing news papers cant build a community because it would show them for what they are. Hacks, croonies, and afraid of being found to be no better than the blogger in his moms basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fly me to the Eyjafjallajokull
Da-Do-do-do-do-do
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Interesting article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"afraid of being found to be no better than the blogger in his moms basement."
that got a response
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consumer vs. Collaborator
Fogbugzd hit the nail on the head. The real issue is controlled consumerism over collaborative media.
While there should be standards(like spell-check yourself)to collaborative journalism, people are stuck under the thumbs of Big Brother, Wall Street, and the Industry.
All three force consumerism. Participation is only a luxury that those holding the gold coin can truly enjoy.
That's all changing. More and more I refer to electronic media sources (newspapers,blogs, etc on my Kindle, blogrolls and news streams on my iGoogle page, etc.)
And I'm not the only one who's tired of dishing out $30 to 40 a year for a subscription to a paper or magazine that eventually winds up compost or kindling in my grill.
We, the citizens, are finally squirming out from underneath and entities like JPG Mag and other are giving us the means and confidence to do so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I bet the Record Industry said the same thing iTunes too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Print Not Dead Yet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Print Not Dead Yet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I really hope you were not looking in a mirror when you typed that three times ... Mr Coburn of US Whip Company will come after you ... ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Everyone's a creator
I think the explosion of tech tools which allow everyone to be creative (in writing, photography, video, music, fashion, design) is going to vastly change how we view creativity. The idea that there will be artists and they will each cultivate a community of supporters around them doesn't seem to be reflecting trends. I see far more people are asking, "How can I be the star?" They don't want to be passive consumers. They'd like to create their own stuff and get some attention for their own creativity.
Of course, a few people will achieve a level of stardom (though I think even fewer will maintain a significant following for decades), but I think most people will at least be able to share their personal creativity with family, friends, and neighbors. The likelihood that they will actually make much money from that output is slim, but if everyone has realistic expectations from the beginning, then I think they will be happy.
The most exciting trend I see in music is the flood of apps that let people with little or no talent/training to create music. It gets people passed the idea of "what can I sell to fans" and on to "how do I help everyone find their inner rock star."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]