Google Fights Back And Wins Against Bogus Patent Lawsuit From Guy Who Couldn't Even Code His 'Invention'
from the a-win-in-east-texas! dept
Joe Mullin, in his usual incredibly thorough manner, has a detailed blog post about Google emerging victorious in a patent infringement lawsuit in East Texas, against one of many non-practicing entities to sue Google claiming patent infringement in the last few years (Mullin notes 46 filed since 2007). In this case, a husband and wife team received two patents (7,240,025 and 7,249,059) on putting ads on other websites, and claimed that Google's AdSense infringed. While there was no assertion whatsoever that Google got the idea from these patents -- and everyone seems to recognize that Google came up with, implemented and built up AdSense entirely independently, the holder of the patent thought he deserved 20% of all of Google's AdSense profits. Oh, and the kicker? He never even finished building the system himself, because the programming was beyond him:While being questioned by one of his lawyers, Dean told the jury that his limited knowledge of code-writing--derived from a junior college programming class--wasn't sufficient to allow him to complete the project. Instead, he hired his programming teacher to finish the job. Unfortunately, Dean and Stone ran out of money before the teacher was done. Dean insisted to the jury, though, that he could have finished the project...And yet he felt he deserves 20% of all of Google's AdSense revenue? Someone is clearly overvaluing the idea vs. the implementation. Thankfully, though, the jury actually recognized that Google was the victim here. Beyond finding that Google didn't infringe, the jury also found parts of the two patents to be invalid.
As Mullin notes, Google appears to be one of a rather small number of big tech companies who are willing to stand up to such bogus patent lawsuits, rather than just paying them off to go away. Many other companies realize that it's cheaper to just pay off the patent holder than to fight it in court, but Google recognizes -- correctly -- that this just encourages more lawsuits of the same nature, and perpetuates the problem.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, east texas, lawsuit, patents
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google
Elishia Windfohr
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flip Side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Flip Side
I can think of a few hardware ideas (in computing and otherwise) that make me thing "someone should invent that..." They're just different...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Flip Side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Flip Side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wiser to Fight
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
technically right
so just on these grounds the claim of this guy was valid
of course I don't know if his patent was valid or relevant to the case!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: technically right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: technically right
That isn't true of any national patent law in Europe. Unfortunately it isn't a bad description of how the EPO (European Patent Office) operates.
Fortunately these patents have to be enforced under national law - which isn't required to follow the same rules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shill!!!
Permit me to educate you...Edison hired various skilled artisans to assist him on his inventions who provided skills or knowledge he was lacking in. Similarly, so did Bell on the telephone and Farnsworth on the TV. Often times 'inventors' as you say have the foresight, but lack specific knowledge or ability to complete their invention alone. You might consider that GM has more than one engineer working on the Corvette. Gawd, you are such a shill for invention theives!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inventor who is reputed to not be a strong programmer
It is unlikely that the author Mr. Masnick knows all the ins and outs of his server, or the other codes and code structures that permit him to denigrate something he really knows not a thing about.
Or in a less polite way- SHUT YOUR PIEHOLE MASNICK.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]