Sweden Says It Won't Agree To ACTA If It Requires Any Changes To Swedish Or EU Laws
from the take-a-stand dept
While US negotiators keep insisting that ACTA won't change US law, they're perfectly willing to admit that's not the case for other countries. That's why much of what the US is insisting on in ACTA looks like the US's quite problematic existing copyright law (minus a few consumer protections and with some "hints" at stricter compliance). However, it looks like at least some countries aren't interested in taking dictation from the US when it comes to their own copyright laws. Henrik Moltke points out that Swedish officials are saying they simply won't agree to ACTA if it requires any changes to Swedish or EU laws. Of course that "or EU laws" part is tricky. What if it requires changes to EU law, and that impacts Sweden even without agreeing to ACTA? Still, it's nice to see some countries standing up and publicly stating they won't be bullied by the US into copying (wait, weren't ACTA supporters calling that "stealing?") US copyright law.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Throwing a bone: A serious idea for a MBA/JD/PH.d Thesis.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Throwing a bone: A serious idea for a MBA/JD/PH.d Thesis.
1. Conflict of interest: Waiting for a Democratic Administration to ask US Leadership for help with inability to take risks within their own business.
2. Disconnection between top-level business leaders and middle management: Allocating capital blindly to legal efforts without asking middle management or end consumers about value creation.
Most of this comes from top-management's arrogance of quantifying the unquantifiable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sweden . . .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I can point everything we did to individual spikes on Quantcast. Now that is amazing.
I wonder how Mike will cope with his Dark Helmet Friend.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Throwing a bone: A serious idea for a MBA/JD/PH.d Thesis.
Problems with almost every US content company listed on the ACTA NDA:
1. Conflict of interest: Waiting for a Democratic Administration to ask US Leadership for help with inability to take risks within their own business.
2. Disconnection between top-level business leaders and middle management: Allocating capital blindly to legal efforts without asking middle management or end consumers about value creation.
Most of this comes from top-management's arrogance of quantifying the unquantifiable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"Tr0l1in' T1me" was originally setup as a joke to see if anyone would join in the fake fun. But M1ke didn't. So it should n0w exist.
But, I've learned in th3 process that some people can't take a joke.
That's why Tr0l1n' T1me exists.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Speaks well to their capability. Yes, we shall leave and let them to the demise of whomever is paying them to peddle their drivel.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Somehow, a comment was fully deleted from
http://techdirt.com/articles/20100302/1024048361.shtml
Dunno how that happened. Must be an inside job.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sarah..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sarah..
[ link to this | view in thread ]