New Jersey Town Claims Copyright Over Public Meetings
from the good-luck-with-that dept
Copycense points us to the news of a New Jersey town, Hammonton, that is apparently trying to claim copyright over its public meetings and anything else broadcast over its public access network. Seems like quite a strange definition of public access television if the focus is on copyrighting all that public content. Even more troubling, of course, is this idea that public meetings in the interest of the public and paid for by the public, are now supposed to be covered by copyright. While the federal gov't isn't allowed to copyright stuff, we have seen local governments claim copyright over documents before -- but claiming copyright over meetings seems like a bigger stretch.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, hammonton, new jersey, public meetings
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I guess I would want to know if they are claiming copyright over any recordings made of the meeting, or only over some sort of 'official' recording made? If John Q. Citizen brought his camcorder in and made his own recording, and they tried to claim copyright over that, then there is a serious issue.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Snooky
- Deeply ashamed of myself
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Snooky
Now, if you used "The Situation," that would be a different story.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And this is why...
They knew that when the power corrupted those in power and they needed to be removed... we had the duty and right to remove them.
Use those arms... in the voting booth... and remove idiots from office.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: And this is why...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And this is why...
"Re: And this is why...
by Anonymous Coward
So you're saying we should shoot all the officials of this city because they have some wrong and misguided ideas about copyrighting public meetings?
?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And this is why...
"Use those arms... in the voting booth... and remove idiots from office."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How About Some Responsibility ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyright
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: And this is why...
Fucking pud-puller.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: And this is why...
it was mildy witty.
As you well know, the right to bear arms has nothing to do with the right to vote. Wit can rely non-sequiters
btw, Fucking pud-puller is a very self revealing way to sign off on a post.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
youth nfl jerseys
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ghd straighteners wolesale
[ link to this | view in thread ]