NYTimes Has To Apologize, Pay $114k For Mentioning Singapore Had Father/Son Prime Ministers?
from the say-what-now? dept
The NY Times published an odd sort of "apology" last week, which is now getting a bunch of attention on Twitter:In 1994, Philip Bowring, a contributor to the International Herald Tribune's op-ed page, agreed as part of an undertaking with the leaders of the government of Singapore that he would not say or imply that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had attained his position through nepotism practiced by his father Lee Kuan Yew. In a February 15, 2010, article, Mr. Bowring nonetheless included these two men in a list of Asian political dynasties, which may have been understood by readers to infer that the younger Mr. Lee did not achieve his position through merit. We wish to state clearly that this inference was not intended. We apologize to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong for any distress or embarrassment caused by any breach of the undertaking and the article.There's so much that's bizarre in this short paragraph that it's difficult to know where to start. But, what may be even more bizarre is what the NY Time's apparently left out. According to other reports, the NY Times also paid $114,000 to the father and son (and to a lawyer representing both). Either way, this whole thing is very odd. Why would a reporter for a respectable publication ever agree not to give an opinion on something? And why would the NY Times' cave for merely stating that having a father and son both as prime minister's represents something of a dynasty?
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Hey now, we said no such thing. In fact, I said the opposite.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is that Country!
I believe 60 minutes did a piece on a Writer that wrote a book that apparently spoke ill of the Prime Minister and when he arrived in the Country he was promptly arrested and taken before the Prime Minister so he could grovel and apologize for his misgivings and beg to be forgiven.
Strange place indeed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
IHT violated.
http://www.democracyweb.org/rule/singapore.php
search text for "slander"
http://www.search.com/reference/Slander_and_libel#Singapore_law
[ link to this | view in thread ]
they got tons of money, but everyone laughs at them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is consistant!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Singapore and defamation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's like saying...
(Obvious joke is obvious, but I couldn't resist)
On a more serious note, this definitely seems like a classic case of the Streisand effect. I wouldn't even have been able to tell you who the Singaporean prime minister was, let alone that there was a suspicion that he only got the job through paternal influence.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Spoing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.04/gibson.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gumshoe Fascist
We wouldn't want his majesty, King Lee, the Second, to get it stuck on his shoe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That's like saying...
[ link to this | view in thread ]