Why Copyright Criminals Filmmakers Won't Get Sued? Because They'd Win
from the again dept
Last year we had a post, based on a post by Peter Friedman, suggesting a big reason why Girl Talk hadn't been sued for creating entirely sample-based music was because there was a good chance that Girl Talk/Gregg Gillis would win that lawsuit, and establish a clear fair use right in sampling. Now, with the more recent discussion about the legality of the documentary Copyright Criminals, Friedman is making the same point again: suggesting that the filmmakers won't get sued, because they would likely win, and redraw the boundaries of the law on music sampling and fair use:But if McLeod is willing to fight a lawsuit -- and I think he is -- the recording industry won't sue him. The existing precedents requiring licensing of every single recorded sample would be overturned, and the record industry would [have] lost the appearance created by these precedents, an appearance that makes the vast, vast majority of samplers pay license fees for their samples. It's better business for the industry to let the occasional brave and creative soul feel as if he's getting away with something than to have the industry's precious -- and ill-founded -- legal precedents put at genuine risk.Of course, there's a separate argument, that has been made by Copycense, that race actually plays a role in this. The musicians who have been sued over sampling tend to be black. Gillis is not:
Gillis hasn't been arrested or sued because his socioeconomic status fits what the mainstream wants to see when it talks about this issue. Gillis' bio reads well for mainstream public relations purposes -- he is white, middle-class, and educated -- and his basic story (fell in love with music and sampling while studying science at a renown institution of higher learning) is All-American. For establishment folks like Congressman Mike Doyle (D-PA), who represents the district in which Gillis resides and has testified before Congress on Gillis' behalf, Gillis' story presents a squeaky clean image of American innovation -- and decidedly not sepia-toned humans toiling against misery in dark, sweaty, basements or ghetto community rooms where sampling and hip hop culture were born out of the need to get by with less.On that note, while the movie Copyright Criminals features a mix of artists of different races, many are black. However, the main fillmmakers behind the film, Benjamin Franzen and Kembrew McLeod, are both white. I have no idea how much of a role this actually plays in the decisions about who to sue over sampling, in music, but if race really does play into it, that would be a shame.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, copyright criminals, fair use, girl talk, sampling
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
trust me greed is the one thing that isn't racist
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nameless One is Right
Plus, they still think they'll figure out a way to make money off Girls Talk.
Just think of it: They'll be able to make money off the original artists' music and then double dip for more money off the sampler's music. It's like shaking the money tree for them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No, they wouldn't win
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
if they start a fight with an educated middle class or above, they're asking for a fight with alumni organizations, trade organizations, facebook groups, etc, etc.
i really liked your imagery: "sepia-toned humans toiling against misery in dark, sweaty basements or ghetto community rooms" beautiful writing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: trust me greed is the one thing that isn't racist
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sue on purpose
I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know all the details on what happens when the person bringing the suit actually wants to lose, but surely someone with standing to sue Girl Talk actually thinks it's awesome that his/her music was used this way.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No, they wouldn't win
How does that change anything? how is copyright enforcable now?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sad, but true.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It IS all about race!
[ link to this | view in thread ]