USTR Continues To Lie: Claims ACTA Release Proved Internet Rumors About ACTA Were False

from the lies,-damned-lies,-and-sticking-up-for-lobbyists dept

Tue, Apr 27th 2010 4:42pm — Mike Masnick

This is pretty funny. After working really hard to keep ACTA negotiations a secret (even ridiculously claiming it was a national security issue), the USTR finally was pressured into release the draft text which showed, in fact, that the online leaks were exactly correct. Yet, the USTR is sticking to its earlier talking point that all the concern about ACTA in the online community was due to "misrepresentation" and "misinformation."

USTR boss Ron Kirk, at a World Intellectual Property Day event earlier this week, claimed that the official release of ACTA text had shown that there was "a lot of the misinformation about ACTA." Except, no, that's not true. While there had been some misinformation about it last summer (mainly due to Kirk's own actions in keeping the document secret), the leaks that started coming out late last year appear to have been 100% accurate. In fact, the significant changes to the officially released copy appear to have been driven by concerns brought forth due to these leaks. He went on to say that it's too early to "judge" things:

"We're still in the middle of the process," Kirk said, adding that "let's not prejudge anything." He also said his office has "gone to great lengths to hear" from all the stakeholders involved in the ACTA debate and will continue to do so.

But that's wrong on a variety of fronts. While the USTR had shown some snippets of the documents, under NDA and only for very brief periods of time, to consumer advocacy groups, that was significantly less access than many industry lobbyists had to the document and the negotiations. As for "pre-judging" the document, the issue isn't "pre-judging" the document, it's about actually listening to the stakeholders. To date, Kirk and the USTR has shown no interest in doing so. That's why they seem to only be publicizing letters from industry lobbyists who support ACTA, but not the concerns of pretty much everyone else about ACTA.

The issue isn't "pre-judging," it's making sure that by the time anyone's allowed to "judge" the document, it isn't too late.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: acta, ustr

29 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 5:02pm

ACTA was never kept secret, the USTR was being transparent all along. At least according to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Derek Kerton (profile), 28 Apr 2010 @ 1:58pm
  
  Re:
  These aren't the droids you're looking for.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 5:03pm

"He also said his office has "gone to great lengths to hear" from all the stakeholders involved in the ACTA debate and will continue to do so. "

and the lies continue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Allen (profile), 27 Apr 2010 @ 6:17pm
  
  Re:
  No, no, no, they have gone to great lengths to hear, they just haven't been listening...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2010 @ 5:59am
  
  Re:
  IMHO, the problem is that they only consider industry lobbyists to be stakeholders. And I think it's an honest mistake on their part... they don't see how this may affect others. Or stated correctly, they see how this affects others (or else they would not have kept it secret), but they don't think the opinion of others is important because it's not their industry that's "dying".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 5:07pm

"let's not prejudge anything."

Yes, because only your judgments matter and no one else should be allowed to judge it until you give the OK. Hence you decided to keep the documents secret until it's too late or until it leaked against your will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Derek Kerton (profile), 28 Apr 2010 @ 2:03pm
  
  Re:
  Yeah. We're not pre-judging the final version...we're post-judging the draft.
  
  Verdict: A biased, over-reaching, one-sided debacle that will adversely affect citizens rights, right to free thought, and will unduly influence domestic laws in a number of countries without due legislative process.
  
  Kirk's logic could be applied to murderers: We shouldn't throw them in jail, because that is pre-judging them on a "draft version" of their lives. We need to let them finish their lives unfettered, then judge them once final.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 5:12pm

They need a good kicking up the arse.

And I mean a coordinated attack from all the last bastions of free speech and privacy, who should come together and fight against this sodden shite before they manage to push it through like they did with the Digital Economy Act here in the UK.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 27 Apr 2010 @ 5:57pm
  
  Re:
  "before they manage to push it through like they did with the Digital Economy Act here in the UK."
  
  In the long run the digital economy bill will cause several things, more privacy due to encryption becoming SOP, secure anon software to replace torrents and P2P, the accelerated collapse of the media companies, the eventual reform of IP law to something more queen anne-ish and consumer friendly, a corporate backlash against the media distribution industry.
  
  In the short run it will mean raids, imprisonment, fines, secondary liability, guilt by accusation.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 5:20pm

Why are you surprised? In the end, it stands to benefit the US Trial Lawyers association, which is a very active political influence in the previous election. The driving force behind it is the same as "too big to fail", only it's "too inept to woo the market".

Even if the product is shit, the grandiose expectation to make mountains of money shouldn't be be lowered, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gee, 27 Apr 2010 @ 6:34pm

keep doing what youre doing
mike if it wasnt for you and people like you, this sort of thing would just be rammed down our throats with no discussion at all - keep it up man!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 7:54pm
  
  Re: keep doing what youre doing
  instead its rammed down your throats with discussion. worse it isnt even rammed down your throats, it is negotiated by the people you elected. if you dont like it unelect them.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 8:08pm
    
    Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
    How is ACTA being negotiated by elected officials? When and where did I vote for the ACTA negotiators?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 9:14pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
      if you are in the us, you people elected obama, a hundred or so senators, and a scad of house members. treaty negotiators work for the government. you know that, dont you mike?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 11:12pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
        Your paranoia is boring.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Any Mouse, 28 Apr 2010 @ 12:15am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
        Treaty negotiators are not elected, they are appointed. Granted, we elected the assholes who appointed them, but this is not being negotiated by elected officials. At least troll intelligently.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2010 @ 6:22am
      
      Re: Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
      ACTA is not being negotiated by elected officials. It is being negotiated by officials appointed by the President.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - abc gum, 27 Apr 2010 @ 8:11pm
    
    Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
    Let's not let facts get in the way of BS /s
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 8:22pm
    
    Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
    I didn't know I elected industry lobbyists.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Fenderson (profile), 29 Apr 2010 @ 8:30am
    
    Re: Re: keep doing what youre doing
    That's true, or at least it's negotiated by people appointed by them. However, once someone is elected to office they are placed under huge pressure from various powerful lobbies. It takes a rare breed with steel spines to withstand that, and even if you do it becomes almost impossible for you to accomplish anything from your own agenda. You have to play the game or be irrelevant. Corruption is built into the system.
    
    So, although voting is critically important, it alone is far from sufficient. We need to balance the powerful lobbies, and apply equally serious pressure in the direction we prefer.
    
    People who are angry at their lack of representation in government are absolutely right in their anger. That anger is also part of how the system works, as it's usually through anger that citizens unite enough to present a powerful counterpressure.
    
    Complacency is the death of our form of government. It warms my heart to hear people realizing their powerlessness and in so doing, discover their power.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
vastrightwing, 27 Apr 2010 @ 8:11pm

The Emperor's New Clothes
Didn't I read this sotry as a child?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Executive Presidential orders ARE NOT democratic, 27 Apr 2010 @ 8:13pm

@9
elected ?
you want to show me a list of the mpaa , riaa, bsa and people that GAVE me the right o vote on such legislation and ill SHOW you how hes bypassing congress with it being an executive order cause OBAMA is to fraidy cat to have the PEOPLE have a say , even there so called elected officials WHOM would be horrified to have to vote for this piece a garbage legislation.

FACT is go look what happened in Canada when they tried BILL-C61 which seems to be an awful lot like ACTA
IT FAILED and now because fo that 67% want lower term rates
and over 80% want protection for non commercial copying.

NOW YOU WILL GET LESS WHICH YOU LAZY BASTARDS DESERVE.
AND to boot that canuck gov't with its corruption scandalous and abuse and torture in Afghanistan is now dropping in polls worse then a lead rock. THe gainer , the ndp party
YEA in another month at this rate your going to see them pass the liberals aka fibrals and the CONserveratives.

they are gonna try and get something rammed at us and the next govt will repeal and destroy it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NAMELESS.ONE, 27 Apr 2010 @ 8:20pm

Also
they said ACTA would be done by June of this year
IF htis is half way then your saying 2012?
GOOD election time in USA and by then we'll also have a new govt in Canada and one that won't be conservative.

SLOWLY but surely were going to eradicate NON democratic govts around the world and YOU OBAMA are becoming ground zero
with your mpaa, riaa , bsa buddies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 9:15pm
  
  Re: Also
  take a pill rd, you sound like you are about to pop a vein.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2010 @ 11:13pm
    
    Re: Re: Also
    hi mike.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nick Dynice (profile), 27 Apr 2010 @ 9:23pm

Ron Kirk is a jerk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2010 @ 8:44am

At the very least the release of ACTA has negated the once famous 'national security' argument always made by officials that wanted to keep it a secret. So either these people are compromising the security of this nation by releasing this document or the national security argument was a lie. and if they lied about that, why should I trust them from this point on?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2010 @ 9:12am
  
  Re:
  The US Trade Representative's Office responded denying the request, saying that the information was "classified in the interest of national security pursuant to Executive Order 12958."
  
  http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090313/1456154113.shtml
  
  So what ever happened to that national security argument anyways?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2010 @ 10:47am
    
    Re: Re:
    It was so laughable that no one bothered to take it seriously.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]