Obama Complains About iPads And Xboxes As Diversions

from the innovation-not-good-enough-for-you dept

Mon, May 10th 2010 8:54am — Mike Masnick

You would think that, in an age when the President is supposed to be encouraging innovation, that new high tech products that are selling in massive numbers and are creating new uses for technology and new ways to communicate and share information would be seen as a good thing. And, as a President often considered to be more "technologically savvy" than his predecessors (and who fought hard not to give up his Blackberry after getting into office) that President Obama would be careful before blatantly slamming some of the most popular technologies around. No such luck. Obama was known, back during his campaign, for occasionally arguing against video games for children, but now he seems to be going further. In a recent Commencement address at Hampton University, President Obama first admitted that he didn't know anything about some modern technologies, but that didn't stop him from lambasting them either:

"With iPods and iPads and Xboxes and PlayStations, -- none of which I know how to work -- information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation."

Huh? Yes, it may be true in some cases, but such a blanket statement across all of those things is blatantly wrong. Ridiculously wrong. Information can be a distraction, but it's also incredibly empowering, and yes, that includes on iPods, iPads, Xboxes and Playstations. In fact, turning information into entertainment is often a very good way of helping to empower people. While he's right to be concerned about false information that can be found online, as he discusses in the speech, the proper response is not a blanket attack on the tools people use to access the information, but on recognizing that you fight misinformation with better information. You fight ignorance with education. And you recognize that these kinds of technological innovations and tools can help with that, in that they can spread good information and education, rather than being seen as part of the problem.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: president obama, technology

62 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Marcel de Jong (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 8:22am

Is this a "Get off my lawn" from Pres. Obama?

"I don't know how those playboxes and iwhatchamacallits work, but I'm sure they are up to no good and are in fact ruining our kids."
Stick to the facts, mister President. Leave the tech to people who DO know a thing or two about them.
BTW, is the internet also a big truck in the White House?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 9:12am
  
  Re:
  http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10066307-38.html
  
  "Ads for Democratic politician Barack Obama are appearing in an Electronic Arts high-speed racing game. This appears to be the first time that a presidential candidate has bought in-game advertising."
  
  So it's good enough to get a few votes but after you win . . . .
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Designerfx (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:46am
  
  Re:
  bingo. Right away I thought his comment was 100% inappropriate.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seth, 10 May 2010 @ 9:09am

Are they not just different forms of entertainment? How do they differ from TV, movies, books, magazines, sports, and etc?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 10:17am
  
  Re:
  "Are they not just different forms of entertainment? How do they differ from TV, movies, books, magazines, sports, and etc?"
  
  He is in the white house to support the entrenced monopolies. Cell phones, concerts, e-books, texting, Social media, video games, chatting online, blogging, reading news aggregators, are reducing the time we are spending on classic entertainment like TV, movies, and shiny disks. I used to watch about 2 hours of TV a night. I am now down to 4 hours a week because of all these other distractions and hobbies I have discovered. Using me as an example it doesnt bode well for non interactive media in the long run.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
R. Miles (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:10am

Uh oh.
I wonder if this means Nintendo's going to remove its News channel, given the blending of information and entertainment seems to be causing problems.

I absolutely love comments by people when the first thing they announce is their ignorance. Makes the rest of their words pointless rhetoric.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freedom, 10 May 2010 @ 9:19am

Wow!
I don't know how this President manages to do it ALMOST EVERY TIME he opens up his mouth he says something that is arrogant and just rubs you the wrong way.

I've got news for him - not everyone cares about politics and in the majority of cases most won't care until it affects them directly. I find it horrible ironic that the main reason he got elected was because of people that were relatively ignorant about him, his core politics, and politics in general ended up voting him into office. You'd think he'd be happy that there were a bunch of entertainment junkies that bought into his feel good BS.

Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- weneedhelp (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 10:05am
  
  Re: Wow!
  "I don't know how this President manages to do it ALMOST EVERY TIME he opens up his mouth he says something that is arrogant and just rubs you the wrong way."
  
  That's when he speaks without his 21 year old speech writer preparing it for him.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 May 2010 @ 6:17am
  
  Re: Wow!
  he is arrogant aint he why he's just trying to divide, destroy and conquer u.s.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
jjmsan (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:22am

Young Children
I refuse to believe that he has 2 young daughters and does not know how to work a playstation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chargone (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 3:03pm
  
  Re: Young Children
  ... *shrugs* my mother has three sons of various ages and only just barely knows how to get a music cd to play on a playstation. plenty of girls have no interest in such things at all. it's not That surprising...
  
  you point is, however, valid to some extent :D
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 9:25am

Look over here (whistle), I found something to try and distract you from the oil spill, the non-existent flood in TN, and the fact that I really and just making this crap up as I go at this point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 10:38am
  
  Re:
  Exactly right- we use these devices to undermine the BS that comes out of his office, cut through his distractions away from his failures and be entertained with up to the second information at his expense. Stop asking why he said this- it is obvious he likes living in his vacuum.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brandon Reinhart, 10 May 2010 @ 9:40am

Oof....
Your blog seriously depresses me. Irrationality rules the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 10:57am
  
  Re: Oof....
  Way to make an effort to argue a point. Nice defeatist attitude.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joel (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:45am

Seriously...
Can we get on matters that are (clears throat) a little bit more trivial?

Are you seriously telling me that the President of any country that is in chaos is going to waste time talking about this?? Please get him a couple of interns and make a new division of government or something don't waste your breath.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
V (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:53am

I didn't vote for him. The dude is a smooth talking sleezbag, akin to the used, used car salesman.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nicholas Overstreet (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:56am
  
  Re:
  Typical Illinois politician. Anyone who expected anything else is a fool.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ShellMG, 10 May 2010 @ 9:54am

I'm definitely not bipartisan...
...but Obama's remark makes absolutely no sense. None. Was he talking off teleprompter?

He gave an iPod to Queen Elizabeth, supposedly uses one himself and yet claims he doesn't know how to use it? Why did he go out of his way to alienate an increasingly tech-savvy electorate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 9:56am

oh brother
All he said was to get off your asses and do something rather than play video games and listen to music. Tech dirt is reading into this way too much. Next tech dirt is going to tell you that your president is a closet technophobe and has someone dial and hold his blackberry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bubba Gump (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 10:02am
  
  Re: oh brother
  "hold his blackberry"????
  
  seriously, tell me you didn't just type that
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 10:42am
  
  Re: oh brother
  All he said was to get off your asses and do something rather than play video games and listen to music.
  
  If he wanted to say that, he should have said that -- not blamed the technology.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 11:04am
  
  Re: oh brother to you
  How is taking a run/walk/etc. in the park with your iPod/Phone not getting off your ass and doing something? Same with a child learning something with an app on the iPhone or iPad. I'm not much of a fan of Apple but lumping technology into one big pile and lighting it on fire isn't a good way to go about things.
  
  I can understand if he actually came out and made a direct speech about kids spending too much time in front of consoles, TV, indoors and they need to break their time up with other activities but he doesn't say that.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- chaz2010 (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 11:43am
  
  Re: oh brother
  Totally agree with your comment. All the supposed 'news reporting' agencies do these days is to try to make their mark off of things that aren't necessarily newsworthy to begin with...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ITWARZ, 10 May 2010 @ 9:58am

Fake Reporting...
The problem with this story is any knuclehead with one of these devices can go to the web and see what the President ACTUALLY said! - ITWARZ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:59am

Same old crap
From the same guy who fought to keep his crackberry?
"none of which I know how to work" see below.
http://images.crackberry.com/files/kevin/presidentobama.jpg

"information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment"

Yeah!!! Cant have all that pesky information running around now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve-o, 10 May 2010 @ 10:02am

a bit misleading
i think your article is a bit misleading, and that was taken out of context. you're right that better information can empower, and he goes on to say that. the quote, incontext, is:

"And meanwhile, you're coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don't always rank that high on the truth meter. And with iPods and iPads; and Xboxes and PlayStations -- none of which I know how to work -- (laughter) -- information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation. So all of this is not only putting pressure on you; it's putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy.

Class of 2010, this is a period of breathtaking change, like few others in our history. We can't stop these changes, but we can channel them, we can shape them, we can adapt to them. And education is what can allow us to do so. It can fortify you, as it did earlier generations, to meet the tests of your own time."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- R. Miles (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 10:10am
  
  Re: a bit misleading
  "We can't stop these changes, but we can channel them, we can shape them, we can adapt to them."
  He forgot, "all the while trying not to get sued by using them, since we're all about intellectual property enforcement."
  
  Oops.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 10:10am
  
  Re: a bit misleading
  Thank you! I was wondering when someone would actually realize what he was talking about and not just grab the soundbite.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Greg, 10 May 2010 @ 11:45am
    
    Re: Re: a bit misleading
    You mean people only took a short sound bite and believed it?? Now you people stick up for your president (not mine) when he might be taken out of context, but when Bush or anyone not of the liberal persuasion gets sound bitten, it's off with their heads instead of listening to the whole quote and taking it in context.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Steve-o, 10 May 2010 @ 12:01pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: a bit misleading
      It's funny how you automatically assume my political affiliation based on one (non political) comment on the internet. Regardless of your political ideology, what happened to "I didn't vote for him but he's my president, and I hope he does a good job?" He's your president, even if you didnt vote for him, and even if you disagree with him. Further, anyone who takes a soundbite clearly out of context then uses it against them is being disengenious (sp?) at best, and intentionally misleadign at worst.
      
      So get off your high horse, and lets attempt to make the president, our president, do a good job, even if we have differing opinions on what that is.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 10:43am
  
  Re: a bit misleading
  i think your article is a bit misleading, and that was taken out of context
  
  I don't see how my quote was taken out of context. He still is blaming the technology, saying that on those devices information because a distraction, a diversion and a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment.
  
  That's a blanket statement that's wrong.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - DS, 10 May 2010 @ 11:25am
    
    Re: Re: a bit misleading
    As a matter of fact, it sounds worse in context. Now he's just not blaming the technology, but it sounds like the only news that's 'true' is the news that gov't approved sources send you.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Yakko Warner, 10 May 2010 @ 11:39am
      
      Re: Re: Re: a bit misleading
      Which makes it more odd that he'd lump Xbox in with the group. I mean, outside of games and such, there is a news channel, which is solely videos from MSNBC. If you buy into the "liberal mainstream media conspiracy", then you have your "government-approved news source" right there.
      
      *shrug* Maybe he really doesn't know how to work an Xbox...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Steve-o, 10 May 2010 @ 12:14pm
    
    Re: Re: a bit misleading
    I dont see it as an attack. True, he is putting some of the blame on the technology itself, which may or may not be warranted(my opinion is that it is not warranted as it is only a medium), but i think he goes on to say exactly what you are saying in your post:
    
    "With so many voices clamoring for attention on blogs, and on cable, on talk radio, it can be difficult, at times, to sift through it all; to know what to believe; to figure out who's telling the truth and who's not. Let's face it, even some of the craziest claims can quickly gain traction. I've had some experience in that regard. Fortunately, you will be well positioned to navigate this terrain. Your education has honed your research abilities, sharpened your analytical powers, given you a context for understanding the world. Those skills will come in handy."
    
    I guess I view his speech as a whole saying 'education is key to sifting through the misinformation and forming your own opinion as you venture ahead in times where information and misinformation is everywhere." So i agree that what you quoted is wrong, but the overall message of the speech falls in line (more or less) with your overall point.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Yet Another Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 12:58pm
    
    Re: Re: a bit misleading
    You are kidding right ? I am not an American, I am a tech-e and a gadget junkie. Now that I have set the context, you are kidding right ? How do you not see that you have taken this comment out of context you troll ?? ( dont mean to offend you..wait I do !) The only reason you wrote this piece of trash is because u get to bad mouth the president. Half of your readers here have somehow missed that point ! When the comment is read in its context it doesnt mean what you make it to mean in your blog. I agree with your president, he seems to have thought things through. He merely stated his view on what these afore mentioned devices do to information, turning into into a purely entertainment commodity. He has not villified technology by doing so, he has only made a statement about a few of the faces of that technology. You should realize that iPxxx Playxxx and Xxxx's are not technology in themselves, merely products of technology. I admit that these are the most "fun" products of recent technology but your president still has a point. He is only urging the students to use technology as means to empower themselves, not merely entertain. "ain't nothin wrong with that!". I like your blog, its fun to read gossip, but if you think your making a real point...:-), think again.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 11:14am
  
  Re: a bit misleading
  I personally like "24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don't always rank that high on the truth meter."
  
  What he doesn't like is when he gets called out on his BS. If it were up to him, all you would hear is an MSNBC slanted take on everything he did. If it goes against him, it doesn't rank high on the truth meter.
  
  He's simply saying he doesn't like to be examined under the same microscope that Clinton and Bush have been with it getting amplified year by year.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hrundel, 10 May 2010 @ 10:42am

re: Obama Complains About iPads And Xboxes As Diversions
People - Mr. President is right about this subject.
Think of it - most / some of you were growing up without a cell-phone attached to your wrist, without a PlayStation planted infront of your TV, this list can go on.
Remember what were you doing then - you actually went-out to see your friends, play sports, explore your surroundings, God forbid went to a museum, a theatre, etc... - now you sit infront of a computer, checking your email on the phone, playing video games on TV - this cultural phenomenon is NOT sustainable - and THANK GOD for a President who see's thru this and says - WE ARE BECOMING SLAVES TO TECHNOLOGY GADGETS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- eilder, 10 May 2010 @ 11:22am
  
  Re: re: Obama Complains About iPads And Xboxes As Diversions
  Yes,
  But the technological world also opens our minds to information about the world which we have access to at our fingertips from multiple different sources. It allows us to cross check references in a way that would have been so much harder just a few years ago. Surely he knows this, yes it is used for entertainment but it also is used for understanding our world and environs. I think he is frightened of this, the more we understand, the more we think, the more we are in touch easier with people around the world the more we can judge him.....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 11:27am
  
  Re: re: Obama Complains About iPads And Xboxes As Diversions
  Going through the history of the world when have we not been a slave to technology? How long has the TV been around? How about the car? Do you ever use these? If not a car, do you use a bus, train? It's all technology.
  
  It's the same 20 years ago as it is today. Keep your kids out from sitting in front of the TV or computer all hours of the day. The principle hasn't change. He just doesn't like the scrutiny that he's under in this day and age where everything he says is now recorded and almost immediately broadcasted in some form.
  
  Nowhere did I see him say anything even close to what you're saying. You took what he said and made an assumption of what you think out of your blind allegiance to a horrific president.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DS, 10 May 2010 @ 11:27am
  
  Re: re: Obama Complains About iPads And Xboxes As Diversions
  Yes, it was much better in the olden days when you didn't have access to news (besides 30 minutes of local and 30 minutes of national)and information (besides what was published in some old out of date books in the library).
  
  Life was simpler because we never were exposed to how complex things really are.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 10:42am

News at 11! The president equates video games as a form of entertainment! When you have an administration that doesn't care about its states being invaded by illegals from Mexico, you would think he'd have something more important to comment on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Joe Perry (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 9:19pm
  
  Re:
  exactly what I was thinking. it's this sort of entitled attitude that I hate. he seems to be implying that those things are bad because they are merely for entertainment and don't empower you with information, but I say, what's wrong with that? is it really so bad just to be entertained sometimes? not every moment needs to be spent towards becoming more empowered and informed. I would hardly say that my x-box 360 is misinforming me or putting pressure on me, not unless President Obama thinks I'm stupid enough to believe everything the 12-year-olds playing Call of Duty say in the game lobby.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
max, 10 May 2010 @ 10:49am

no distraction
I do not see how a cell phone or ipad is a distraction - I now do everything by myself without the need to interact with other people. Innit that special?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 10:54am

and who is to determine what constitutes misinformation? The mainstream media? HAH, just about everything they say is a lie, I don't want them deciding anything. They just want to shove lies down our throat as if their lies are true and find some pretext to censor the truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hephaestus (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 11:18am

Obama - "You’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t rank all that high on the truth meter"

The line

"some of which don’t rank all that high on the truth meter"

Reminds me of his, office of IP enforcement, and the USTR ... well that and anytime any politician opens his mouth to talk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bradley Stewart, 10 May 2010 @ 11:18am

Ops Not The Las Vegas Remark Again
President Obama needs to think about some of the implications that come from what he says. Rather than taking on something like this I believe it would be better for him to rather just suggest a more balanced life. This to me makes a lot more sense since people will pretty much do what they want to anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wanderlust (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 11:31am

Distraction
This is simply a distraction to all the other problems that he has occurring right now and not dealing with.

He's effectively used a distraction to discuss a distraction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mac_fanatic, 10 May 2010 @ 11:36am

Ouch!
Considering Apple's liberal political slant, it must hurt Steve Jobs to hear Obama saying bad things about iPods and iPads...

Just goes to show you... Actually, I'm not even going to say it, considering I am a Conservative and a Mac user, since 84.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
chaz2010 (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 11:50am

Open your eyes, folks...
For all these folks who think the point of this article was to give fodder for bashing the President, you are missing the point. His statement was to say that too much information can, indeed, be crippling, and as one who has watched a nation of youth with access to more information than ever, making even more and more idiotic mistakes, you have to wonder whether there is some truth there. In fact, I'd argue that most of us are swimming in more 'information' than we can reliably digest and use; we are constantly pummeled by advertising, internet articles, text messages, emails, opposing opinion reviews that have questionable supporting data... I know many people who are simply choosing to checkout from all of this, and I fear that we do not yet know the impact to our society of such mass amount of data. Do we have to look back farther than recent terrorist attacks to see how we are struggling to process of this so-called 'information'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2010 @ 12:24pm
  
  Re: Open your eyes, folks...
  Isn't that what the pope said when he heard of something called a printing press?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - greg.fenton (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 12:57pm
    
    Re: Re: Open your eyes, folks...
    And look how much trouble that got the church into! Things were So Much Easier when the only ones who could read were the ones at the front of the congregation.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
MissingFrame, 10 May 2010 @ 11:54am

Why is our President giving graduation speeches?
No other black President in the history of the U.S. has ever made commencement speeches, ever! Why must it start NOW?!? When there's a war going on and our economy is on the fritz we must not take a single break from our vigilance! Now watch me hit this drive ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TW Burger (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 12:51pm
  
  Re: Why is our President giving graduation speeches?
  Um, what other black President? I can only remember the two Jews, the Chicano, the Chinese guy, and that woman.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - MissingFrame, 10 May 2010 @ 3:49pm
    
    Re: Re: Why is our President giving graduation speeches?
    Exactly ... I didn't see anything so out-of-line this time to any Presidential commencement speech in history, and there are MANY to go back and read. At least his is better than the average.
    
    Sure, this President isn't as techie as people wanted him to be, but still compared to Bush or McCain he was a techie. And his statement that information becomes a distraction ... rather than a tool of empowerment, well has any of you ever seen a Bing commercial? I'd say the point is spot-on.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - TW Burger (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 6:39pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Why is our President giving graduation speeches?
      I'm glad someone else saw the point too.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - TW Burger (profile), 10 May 2010 @ 6:46pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Why is our President giving graduation speeches?
      BTW, was that an Eisenhower joke at the end? My mother met him once at an embassy function - nice guy but he played too much golf when he should have been engaging in diplomacy and helped set up that whole Cuban missile crisis. Too bad Khrushchev didn't have a nine handicap.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
bob, 10 May 2010 @ 1:21pm

I Think
This is all about the man behind the curtain.
Look at the agenda, not the message.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reed, 10 May 2010 @ 6:13pm

Just another distraction.
I don't know where Obama is going with this but I think he missed the mark. What I would say is devices like the Ipod, Xbox, and PlayStation are not allowing for creativity and freedom of content creation the way they should thus are just entertainment rather than being something more which they could easily be.

After talking with a friend who seems to think Apple's new business model with spread to other devices I was just thinking to myself what a world that was run by Ipads would be like. Would it be a world strangely absent of content creation and creativity that we see currently? I think the answer is yes.

The Iphone and Ipad in particular with their "app" store seems to be focusing on limiting people's options and preventing creativity especially by the end user. In a world were devices should be increasingly open to match the modern progression of society they stand apart, almost a throwback to the 20th century.

I really think that Steve Job's has taken Apple down the road of retardation. I can hardly think of the Ipad as a device that would allow end users to create. So much for the artists and creative types who normally swear by Apple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Me, 11 May 2010 @ 5:35am

Leave me alone
Wrong Obama
Videogames "emancipate" me at least temporarily from living in this corrupt, poisoned and shitty world.
Without my passion for videogames I would be dead a long time ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dillon Kato (profile), 11 May 2010 @ 8:36pm

One thing
I hope that nobody issuing a report to Obama every makes him a graph of data again. That would be making the information too much of a distraction. Just push him a stack of raw spreadsheets and let him deal with it...I mean be empowered by it.

Turning information into entertainment, putting into a reference that we can more easily understand is one of the easiest ways to ensure that information spreads. That's why things like LeapFrog and TeacherMate have become such broadly reaching educational tools. What is Mr. Obama thinking?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cap'n Jack (profile), 21 Aug 2010 @ 9:31pm

You're way off here!
This is an uncharacteristically silly article from you, Mike. I consider your criticisms generally exactly on point and enlightening, but this one is overly defensive about something I believe you misunderstood. Taking Obama's words in context, he's warning University students about the under-realized problem of information porn - warning that news can become a distraction rather than a form of empowerment, not that it necessarily always is.

This is not Obama decrying the dangers of new technologies, or discounting the benefits of innovation (as you so egregiously put it - why you would say that is beyond me!). Basically the problem is that with all our new GADGETS (tablets, smartphones - even video game consoles) the way our news comes to us is taken less seriously, with less scrutiny, but more importantly, AS A DISTRACTION. We go to Wikipedia and surf for hours about nothing, or check out our news feed and hours later realized we accomplished nothing. This is made easier with toys.

Obama thinks the solution to being overloaded with access to information but still keying in on important points is education. What else can we do to avoid distractions, even distractions that - at the surface - seem meaningful? These are honestly the kinds of questions I'd check out Lifehacker for, not Techdirt, but that's what he seems to be talking about. Dealing with information in the 21st century, not burning books because there are too many of them.

Simply put, you're asking the wrong questions, you're giving the wrong answers, and you're making the wrong criticisms. You said, and I quote:

"While he's right to be concerned about false information that can be found online, the proper response is not a blanket attack on the tools people use to access the information ... you fight ignorance with education."

Well, obviously! That's the president's point! How did you miss that one? He said the solution is EDUCATION, and he said we need to ADAPT to technologies. So, with all due respect tell me again what YOUR point is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]