Is There A Downside To Limiting Third Party Liability?
from the still-looking-for-it... dept
We recent wrote about Brazil's very welcome decision to fix its widely abused third party liability issues, by saying service providers would only need to take down any kind of content with a court order (i.e., no simple "notice and takedown.") This is a very smart move that protects freedom of speech as a key principle, and assures due process before any kind of content (not just for copyright issues) is removed. However, not everyone agrees. Marcelo Thompson, a professor and acting co-director of the Law and Technology Centre at the University of Hong Kong sends in a write-up he did expressing serious concerns about such a policy, worrying that it would make Brazil a hub for service providers, where forms of "victimization," privacy violations and cyberbullying cannot easily be dealt with. He says:Imagine if all online service providers decide to move to BrazilWhile I can see Thompson's basic concern, I'm afraid I don't see how it's justified. The bill does still retain ways to take down that content under a court order. Thus, there is due process in place. Will the process sometimes be abused? Certainly. But that's the price one pays for supporting free expression.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: brazil, liability, notice and takedown, third party
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
and lets not forget about the cyberwar. Will someone please think of the children?!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But that's pretty nonsensical considering we do need the tubes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This makes sense
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Imagine...
Only in a warped mind would someone complain about be the Internet hub for the planet!
Freedom
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thoughts on third party liability
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thoughts on third party liability
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
But why do they need a more expedient method - once a court is involved to remove the content surely the copyright holder would also prosecute the "infringer" for $$$$$$$$$$$?
Thus they are recompensed for the delay and costs? I am sure if the courts receive a constant stream of these they would expedite or streamline the court process in response.
Also how would it be a haven for "all sorts of abuse"... surely it would only be a haven for ISPs with infringing copyright content hosted by them?
"...years of legal horseshit..." so you agree the system needs to be improved - finally TAM and I agree :)... er that is you TAM?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What are your thoughts on this?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Renrou Sousuo Yinqing
http://nyti.ms/aHw8i8
Daniela Cicarelli's was short. Though she succeeded in the Court of Appeals of Sao Paulo, her video is online for the world to see: http://bit.ly/9KTjIc
It sounds to me there is no reason why OSPs, once made aware of the nature of what they host, should not be required to act as responsible agents of the communicative process.
http://bit.ly/btizt0
On top of that, there is no specific Data Protection Act (or Privacy Act, Privacy Tort ...) in Brazil, and generally very few statutes dealing with networked wrongdoing.
Also, the wording of the proposed Framework renders it extremely unlikely that OSPs will act autonomously and take down content even of the most patently illegal nature. They risk being held liable if they do so, whereas if they don't... they are invulnerable.
The only case where by law OSPs are expressly obliged to take illegal content down in Brazil is Child Porn. For all the rest... good luck to the victims.
Best,
MT
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Free Expression is the Problem...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Renrou Sousuo Yinqing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
***
Murder takes only takes a second to do, and can take years of legal horseshit to...uhm...undo.
I suppose this means the system is biased towards the offender. I mean, it sometimes takes years to send the guy to the chair...why don't we remove that procedure and immediately kill the guy the moment we catch him to correct this bias?
Ok good idea! Now you have a procedure problem: a police officer kills a suspect (with proper use of deadly force).
Should his fellow officers terminate him on spot? Ok good, now you have a recursion problem, since they would also be committing the crime of murder. Cutting the recursion short, the entire population of earth would die (assuming we all followed the same rules).
Now, given this, what would you prefer? Follow the correct procedure or get immediate satisfaction?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Renrou Sousuo Yinqing
Whats your point here? She got caught having sex in public and was unlucky enough to have it filmed. Bad for her, good for me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TRANSLATION.
It sounds to me there is no reason why OSPs, once made aware of the nature of what they host by some authority moral, perceived or real, they should be required to act as agents of censorship for that authority to have the right to be called responsible.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Very educational indeed and shows well up to which levels you would take your freedom of expression.
[ link to this | view in thread ]