DailyDirt: Moving To Outer Space (Temporarily)

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Mon, Oct 20th 2014 5:00pm — Michael Ho

The number of ways to get people into space is at a record low right now, but some projects on the horizon are planning to get more people living in space in the not too distant future. Commercial space ventures are going to be shuttling (or capsule-ing, as the case may be) people to low earth orbit, and some other projects are aiming for more distant journeys. Here are just a few space exploration plans to keep an eye on if you still want to be an astronaut someday.

In December, NASA is planning to launch Orion on a Delta IV Heavy rocket as a test for its next generation manned space vehicle that may one day get astronauts to Mars. No one will be on board for the first trip, but the craft will be gathering data to make sure the vessel is suitable for transporting people comfortably and safely. [url]
The Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) is an inflatable habitat that can connect to the International Space Station and provide commercial living space for a little over $50 million for a 2 month stay. This will be a steal compared to the current $40 million price tag for an individual to stay on the ISS for a week. (No word yet if you'll be able to re-rent out your spot on Airbnb.) [url]
The optimism of the Mars One project should not be dismissed, but the technology to actually build a viable colony on the red planet may be further from reality than 2025. An analysis from some MIT students concludes that Mars One is unlikely to be sustainable with the current state of its technological progress. [url]

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: beam, colony, delta iv, iss, leo, manned missions, mars, mars one, orion, space, space exploration
Companies: bigelow, boeing, mit, nasa, spacex

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Mason Wheeler (profile), 20 Oct 2014 @ 5:35pm

Wasn't the record low about 100 years ago, when the number was 0?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mason Wheeler (profile), 20 Oct 2014 @ 5:38pm

Also, from the Mars One criticism article:
The lead author, Sydney Do, a Ph.D. candidate in aeronautics and astronautics at MIT, said via email that in his view “the Mars One Concept is unsustainable” because of the current state of technology and its “aggressive expansion approach” of quickly adding more and more people rather than keeping the settlement at a fixed size for a period of time.

So even with well under a thousand planned colonists on the entire planet, people are warning about overpopulation issues? :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 20 Oct 2014 @ 6:42pm

Could We Do A Space Elevator In Low-Earth Orbit?
Just wondering about the practicalities of a shorter cable (say 150km) that isn’t anchored to the ground, but passes through the atmosphere at, say, stratosphere level. Something that can be reached by craft requiring less power than full orbital rockets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roger Strong (profile), 20 Oct 2014 @ 7:15pm
  
  Re: Could We Do A Space Elevator In Low-Earth Orbit?
  Because a Space Elevator has its center of gravity out at geosynchronous orbit, it stays at one spot on the equator. A 150km cable would be in very low earth orbit, travelling VERY fast over the ground. The wind drag would rotate around.
  
  But that's OK. That's where a Rotovator - a type of Momentum Exchange Tether - comes in:
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum_exchange_tether
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 20 Oct 2014 @ 7:31pm
    
    Re: Could We Do A Space Elevator In Low-Earth Orbit?
    Ah, “Rotovator” ... that sounds like what I was thinking of.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Oct 2014 @ 3:52pm
  
  Re: Could We Do A Space Elevator In Low-Earth Orbit?
  https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/shootthemoon/shoot-the-moon-a-documentary-feature-film?ref=48hr
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Roger Strong (profile), 20 Oct 2014 @ 7:19pm

Mars One's 2025 timeline has always been pure fantasy. Their economics for a manned trip are pure fantasy.

That doesn't mean nothing good will come of it. They're planning an unmanned lander - paying Lockheed Martin to build a duplicate of their Phoenix Lander.

http://www.mars-one.com/en/mars-one-news/press-releases/11-news/517-lockheed-martin-and-sstl- selected-for-mars-one-s-first-unmanned-mission-to-mars

They've raised $544,026 collecting application fees. Now they just need to raise the other 99.9985% of the $350 million needed to build the lander. If they do that soon, perhaps LockMart can have it built by their 2018 launch date.

And assuming they can con a second similar round of would-be astronauts to raise the same amount, then they just need to raise the remaining 96% of the $56.5 million Falcon 9 launch cost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nilsson, 21 Oct 2014 @ 5:02am

I wanted to be a spaceman
That's what I wanted to be
But now that I am a spaceman
Nobody cares about me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 21 Oct 2014 @ 9:44am

Inflatable modules?
I don't know about anyone else, but if I were going to be spending time in an airless vacuum, I'd want nice, thick metal around me, not an inflatable bag. Yes, I know space suits are basically an inflatable bag, but they're also much smaller and you spend a lot less time in them. If a suit gets punctured, one person might end up dead. If an inflatable pod gets punctured, everyone in it might end up dead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Fenderson (profile), 21 Oct 2014 @ 10:17am
  
  Re: Inflatable modules?
  This doesn't bother me at all -- mostly because in terms of protection from impacts, there's not much difference between one of these inflatable systems and having a hard shell. The things that can hit you in space are going very, very fast and have a lot of kinetic energy. They slice through the hull of a metal spacecraft as easily as an inflatable one.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roger Strong (profile), 21 Oct 2014 @ 12:22pm
  
  Re: Inflatable modules?
  Bigelow's inflatable modules use several layers of vectran, twice as strong as Kevlar. You'd be safer than in standard ISS modules.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]