Ripoff Report Wins Against Extortion Claim
from the for-now... dept
Ripoff Report is a site that we've discussed a few times before, as it's dealt with a bunch of lawsuits -- all of which it has successfully defended itself against -- from organizations upset that users wrote negative reviews on the site. Of course, as you should know, Ripoff Reports has a strong Section 230 safe harbor defense: it's not creating the content, and thus, is not liable. But, over the past few years we've seen more and more attempts to get around Section 230 with creative lawyering. In the latest case against Ripoff Report, the workaround was to charge the company with RICO (racketeering) violations for trying to "extort" companies. Specifically, a company named the Asia Economic Institute (AEI) was upset about a series of negative complaints about its work environment, and asked for them to be removed. Ripoff Report notes that it never removes content, but did pass on information about its Corporate Advocacy Program (CAP), where, for a fee, it tries to effectively moderate between the company and the complaining individual. AEI suggested that this was presented in an extortionary manner -- as in "if you want to fix your reputation, you need to pay."As Eric Goldman notes, this particular attack appears to have failed miserably, in large part due to the fact that Ripoff Report secretly recorded all of its phone calls. AEI fought against revealing the content of the phone calls, noting that it did not know its staff were being recorded -- and, in the end, the judge actually does deem the evidence inadmissible. But just the fact that Ripoff Reports presented the recordings made the two principles from AEI suddenly have their memories jogged, and admit that they might have been "confused" about what was actually said in the calls. From there, the judge found little evidence that the CAP program actually represented any kind of extortion.
AEI claimed that Ripoff Report's promise to defend itself against any lawsuit represented a legal threat. However, the judge points out that such an interpretation makes little sense. Claiming you will strongly defend yourself against any lawsuit is hardly a threat. On top of that, the judge notes that a "a threat to take legal action cannot constitute extortion unless the threat was made with knowledge that the threatened claim was false and without merit." Furthermore, the judge notes that the threat to defend itself from any legal action was entirely separate from the CAP program. Thus, the supposed (but non-existent) "threat" was entirely independent from any request for money.
As for the CAP program, the judge doesn't see that as a threat either, specifically noting that Ripoff Reports makes it clear that no reports on the site will be removed, so there's no demand for payment to remove a negative report.
AEI was a content publisher from 2000-2009 (it's now out of business), and during those 9 years, it had zero revenues. This could make it hard for AEI to garner much judicial sympathy over any harm to its business.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: complaints, extortion
Companies: asia economic institute, ripoff report
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Are they "Out of Business"?
Now I realize Mike was quoting Goldman on this, but I just looked and there is an 'Asia Economic Institute (AEI)' website still up at http://www.asiaecon.org/
From the 'About Us' Page: "The Asia Economic Institute (AEI) began in 1999"
From The 'Contact Us' Page: "Correspondent Office ... Wilshire Blvd ... Los Angeles, CA"
Looks like the same company to me, are we sure they are out of business? I would hope they are with the bull they are trying to pull, but the website seems to still be active. Of course they could have paid for the hosting in advance and just never bothered to take the site down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Are they "Out of Business"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems That AEI is plagiarizing Articles
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unverified
I wouldn't take anything on the site serious or believe half of it since anyone can post anything under any name and it stays unless you pay. Great concept but apparently ran by assholes looking for a quick buck and it does sound like extortion to me.
I was looking for one about Ripoff Report but didn't see one. Maybe I'll post a complaint about them posting invalid complaints or accuse them of extortion, would it stay up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unverified
I mean really, you couldn't be any more obviously connected to AEI in some way as to be the only person asserting exactly the same claims as they are, of course Mike knows where you are posting from, don't you Mike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Unverified
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unverified
You know, I'm sure a smart business plan could use this to identify some issues and address them to the one making the complaint and also maybe..internally...
Nope fixing anything in your organization is too much effort. Bring on the lawreys
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Unverified
There were no lawyers involved with RR, that would be insane for a few local retail shops. He did have his lawyer send a letter to the ex-employee that outlined the fabrications made. The guy wasn't real smart and documented lies, that could be proven as such, in the report. But again, even showing that the guy was off in the head and a liar, the report remains some 7 years later.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unverified
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Post ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'll bet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ripoff Reports doesn't just affect Companies...
Here's the tale of one such young man who's life was affected by Ripoff Reports.
http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/related/ckcjc/reddit_can_you_please_help_me_for_five_y ears_i/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ripoff Reports doesn't just affect Companies...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They even went as far as to say they had a private investigator check me out. Of course all that info was completely incorrect. But how many people would I have to show my resume too and have them go through my references to prove it is all lies?
And by then the harm is done. People need to trust the accountant they hire for their business. And even though I have a squeaky clean background check it's hard to bypass that lingering word, scam artist.
And the worse thing is, I've already read about people that have won court cases against people for deformation on that site, yet RR still refuses to take down the info. Check youtube, there was a news story about a woman that happened to in Chicago. And they were all complete personal attacks. None of it was related to a consumer issue.
RR needs to be shut down!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The dirt bags who run these sites have created "haven of evil" and so in the natural progression of such, take-em out!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
help remove rip off report for good
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/take-down-web-site-ripoffreportcom-now-it-costs-us-econo my-billions-lost-revenue-false-reports-seo/bMvV3wx1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: help remove rip off report for good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Samantha Rollins deserves a ripoffreport.
You struggled to get help here and there on the internet, unforgettably your big name is still along with ripoffreport and I am sure it will last forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Samantha Rollins deserves a ripoffreport.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Samantha Rollins deserves a ripoffreport.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]