Kazaa Returns As Expensive, Crappy DRM'd Music Service
from the good-luck-there... dept
Remember Kazaa? The name was synonymous with file sharing following Napster's demise. It got shut down by a series of lawsuits a few years ago. Last we heard from the company, it had settled lawsuits with record labels and music publishers and promised to go straight. That was in 2006. Since then... nothing. Until now, when it launched its new "authorized" music service. You might think that, given the four years between it announcing plans for a legit music service and the actual launch, there would be enough time to actually create something new or compelling. Instead, it appears that it's launching a service that would have been state of the art back in... 2006 when it settled those lawsuits. From Jon Healey's review:I haven't had much time to explore Kazaa, but my first impression is that the Web-based service is miles behind the competition. It's as if the company locked its technologists in a room four years ago and they've just now emerged, having missed the growth of social networks, the explosion in smartphone usage and the death of music DRM. The service costs $15 a month -- 50% more than Rdio, MOG or Rhapsody -- and doesn't have a mobile app. Instead, it offers unlimited streams and tethered downloads (that is, songs wrapped in electronic locks to deter copying) that can be played only by Kazaa's proprietary plugin for Windows Media Player.Seriously. Windows Media Player DRM. Didn't that die out years ago?
It also has only rudimentary social-media features, most notably the ability to play other users' playlists and to watch a continuously updated list of what other users are playing. And although there are a handful of "editor's picks," there's no preference engine to recommend tracks based on a user's tastes -- a major handicap when it comes to discovering music. Essentially, users are left to search for tracks or artists they already know, or take unguided tours through the library's eight genres.
Healey also notes the amusing fact that Kazaa's relaunch happened to come the same day that Kazaa's original founders, Janus Friis with Niklas Zennstrom, launched their latest startup, Rdio, which is also an authorized music streaming service. While I've played around with Rdio and find it to be a pretty weak offering -- overall, it sounds miles ahead of the "new" Kazaa. It really does make you wonder what Kazaa has been doing for the past four years.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, kazaa, music, music services
Companies: brilliant digital, kazaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
*ack*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Damn, I really feels sorry for those technologist who were locked away for four years.
But then again, we have to face the fact that third parties cannot truly innovate as long as the labels have complete control over their plans.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Whoa Kazaa
And now they're back. I give them 6 months before they close up shop (and I feel that I am being generous). As stated, they are offering nothing that consumers want. Nothing. Why do the labels and others think stuff like this will work? Consumers have already spoken about what they want, and this is not it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Locked in a Room...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Throwing money away
Here's a prototype I made a few years ago: Quidmusic. No DRM. The musician sells their music. Copies are free (in both senses). The fans can share and remix all they want (the artist has been paid).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Brand Equity?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Brand Equity?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm just speculating here...
As a programmer, I can almost write out this script:
RICAP*: Well, since we sued your ass out of existence, we own you. Start coding.
Kazaa: With what? You killed our ad revenue.
RICAP: Not our problem. Code, or we'll sue you again.
Kazaa: Fine. [3 months later, delivers a product]
RICAP: What's this shit?
Kazaa: Online streaming with DRM.
RICAP: No, it plays in too many players. Restrict it to one.
Kazaa: Which one?
RICAP: WMP.
Kazaa: But that's a dead player?
RICAP: Again, your point?
Kazaa: (sighs) [presents another product]
RICAP: Oh, you have got to be kidding us. What's with this customized options and flexibility you're giving to users?
Kazaa: Well, we thought...
RICAP: No. Listen, this is simple: develop a product no one wants using technology we can control in a manner that makes listening to music difficult so they will run to iTunes and buy it for the outrageous price of $0.99. You're not making a real product, so stop trying.
Kazaa: You know, you're dicks.
*RICAP is not a real entity. Any similarities and you should be ashamed of yourselves.
I'm also betting Kazaa probably went through quite a few programmers to get the job done.
Way to go, RICAP. Score another victory for your... hold on... gotta move this file so it's not in the shared folder... asinine attempt at market control.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm just speculating here...
It can be compared to the speculation that Murdoch has every expectation that paywalls will fail, but he has to try them in order that their inevitable failure can be used to justify collection of a news tax or levy.
RICAP also has to demonstrate that both copyright enforcement and 'legal' alternatives fail to deter piracy in order to collect a music tax or levy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Don't forget, they did once succeed
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Subject
Anyways...ummm...yep. DRM-riddled WMA will make them rich. Yep...uh huh...that'll...ummm...work. Yeah...hmmm...it will...umm..for sure.
Okay. I have to go back to my free and unrestricted torrent downloads.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Brand Equity?
I'm afraid the Kazaa brand is irretrievably damaged by its past reputation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bravo Kazaa!
Bravo to Kazaa for having the guts to stand up against criminal piracy.
As expected, the industry is vindicating Brandt Morain's Anti-Piracy stance. In the last few months Warner Music, Kazaa, the FBI and ISP's, and even Prince are following Brandt Morain's bold move.
These developments, and more, clearly indicate that piracy and copyright infringement are terrible for business and blatantly illegal.
Brandt Morain took a lot of heat originally for refusing to sell their debut CD until piracy is solved. It now appears that the solution may be coming sooner rather than later.
These recent industry moves illustrate that Brandt Morain was WAY ahead of the curve.
Sincerely,
Marie Summers
Director of Marketing
Brandt Morain Studios
www.BrandtMorain.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]