Las Vegas Review-Journal Thinks Suing Sites Over Copyright Will Mean More People Link To It
from the uh,-try-less dept
We've been following the lawsuits filed by Righthaven for a few months now. If you haven't been following the story, this is the company, funded by the owner of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, that is suing a bunch of sites (over 100, and increasing rapidly) for reposting content from the LVRJ. In many cases, the lawsuits hit message boards, where the site owners have clear DMCA protections. Also, Righthaven does not issue any DMCA takedown notices -- it just goes straight to suing. Joe Mullin has a story about Righthaven that includes a few more details, including the fact that about 30% of those sued have settled -- but for amounts ranging from $2,185 to $5,000 -- well below the $75,000 demanded. And, none of the settlements have resulted in anyone turning over their domain, as demanded. So, if we assume 30 of the lawsuits have paid $5,000 (we'll take the upper bound), that's $150,000 over the course of about 4 or 5 months. Take away the "cost" of buying the copyrights, and filing the lawsuits (a few hundred bucks) and this hasn't been a hugely lucrative business. Some of the sites that haven't settled are gearing up to fight this in court (we've heard from a bunch), and suddenly whatever Righthaven earned seems to go negative fast if it has to spend time in a courtroom.But, even more ridiculous are the laughable claims from Steve Gibson, the guy behind Righthaven, and Mark Hineuber, the general counsel for the parent company of the LVRJ. Hineuber is claiming:
"My hope," says Hinueber, "is we will raise awareness of copyright laws, and have more links back to our site, and have less of our material infringed on the Internet."Yeah, right. Suing people linking to you is going to get more links? Considering that some of the examples of sites being sued included one that posted just 4 paragraphs of a 34-paragraph article... with a link, it seems that these lawsuits are almost guaranteed to lead to less linking.
Gibson keeps claiming that his is not a legal shakedown business, but a technology business. This is pretty laughable too. If they invested in technology beyond "searching Google," they've wasted money here. But even more ridiculous is the claim that this somehow makes business sense:
"Since the advent of the Internet, there has been an ocean of infringements of copyright that have gone unaddressed," Gibson says. "I've also seen that many media companies have been facing financial difficulties. I was inspired to pursue technological solutions and marry them with the available legal machinery."Actually, no, that's not true. It hasn't gone unaddressed. Lots of companies have tried suing, and so far it's been a dismal failure, costing a lot more money than it ever brought it and calling much more attention to the ability to infringe. To ignore that basic history is pretty laughable.
Amusingly, the article also has the Righthaven folks admitting some "kinks" that need "to be worked out," such as the time it sued the very source for an article (apparently, this has happened more than once). In the one case that we wrote about, after that came to light, Righthaven dropped the lawsuit. I'm guessing that after some more lawyers start fighting back against Righthaven, it's going to discover quite a few more "kinks" in its system.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, las vegas, lawsuits, links
Companies: righthaven
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Now let's get your views on copyright cleared up and we'll be all squared away ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't blame them, they wouldn't want people selling those notices on e-bay and making a ton of money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
stupid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: stupid
The brand name legislators in the Senate certainly look nicer with all of their shiny packaging, but they taste exactly the same....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: stupid
Would you suggest a 5 course meals for Senators and a quick stir fry for House of Representatives members?
For those of us in a Parliamentary system based on London that would be 5 course meals for front bench Cabinet members and a stir fry for everyone else. ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: stupid
Senators, on the other hand, are known for having an overbearing flavor. Let's be honest, their taste/smell can simply take over a room. Your best bet with them is to temper them down, either by a light soak in a flavorful red wine (cabernet sauvignon works best), or even a light garlic butter sauce to provide a strong base flavor.
Either way, once you've done that, you'll want to throw either on the grill and make sure you cook them real good. Both House Reps and Senators tend to carry small but debilitating diseases that will thieve away your hope for the world (not, oddly, unlike a Dementor, except real). An open grill should get the grate up to at least 400 degrees, a closed grill can be less, like 350 degrees.
Either way, feed some of the House Rep or Senator to your dog first. If the dog does not immediately goose step over to the television to watch either Fox News or MSNBC, you should be in the clear....
(As a side note, it strikes me that a parody cook book in which it discusses how to cook all the things we hate in this world and all the funny "dangers" posed by them might be worth exploring....)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: stupid
(Actually it would be worth exploring, wouldn't it? ;-) Got me thinking now, you have, about who and what to cook next.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: stupid
In the tradition of TechDirt: Copyright Law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: stupid
BTW, not sure if anyone is still reading this thread, but I am starting the TechDirt Cookbook with this previous example as the basis for the first "recipe". If anyone would like to help or has suggestions, please let me know....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wish these newspapers would hurry and die already
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, been there, done that got head handed to plaintiff; sorry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Link Boycott
This "purpose" seems like an after-the-fact and cooked up tale to try and control the negative publicity that these suits have brought raining down on the Las Vegas Review Journal. From what I have seen, many of the defendants DID provide back-links.
If anything, this is likely to result in a link boycott rather than more links to the LVRJ.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Link Boycott
Does linking back to the article somehow change whether it's copyright infringement or not? I didn't think so, but if it does, please do tell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Link Boycott
http://www.iab.net/iab_products_and_industry_services/1421/1443/1452
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Link Boycott
But Righthaven doesn't have any business to "boycott." Wouldn't it make more sense to boycott the LVRJ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, right !
Haha, yeah, right. I frequently post on a number of message boards in Las Vegas, and all have instituted policies of not posting any links to lvrj.com. Goog luck with the ambulance chasing, R-J !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/143700
[ link to this | view in chronology ]