LucasFilm Skips The Jedi Mind Trick And Just Straight Up Sues 'Jedi Mind'

from the the-force-is-strong-with-this-one dept

Mon, Aug 23rd 2010 12:43pm — Mike Masnick

Fresh off its legal lightsaber battle with Wicked Lasers, LucasFilm's legal department has moved on to pulling a Jedi Mind trick... literally. David Canton points us to the news that LucasFilm has filed a lawsuit against a Nevada company called Jedi Mind. Not surprisingly, they're not particularly happy with the name, and are charging the company with trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, breach of contract and unfair competition (under California's law). Apparently, a Jedi Mind is no match for a good legal department... Of course, this case seems a lot stronger than the lightsaber one, and my guess is that Jedi Mind is going to have to backdown quickly, or it's going to lose pretty badly. Even auctioning off the lawsuit papers probably won't help...

THREsq has a lot more details on the lawsuit, noting that after receiving a cease & desist from LucasFilm's lawyers last year, Jedi Mind had agreed to phase out the use of the name. The lawsuit (and the breach of contract claim) comes from its failure to do so. The other interesting point: Lucas doesn't actually hold a trademark on "Jedi" or "Jedi Mind." It does hold trademarks on Jedi Knight, Jedi Power Battles and Jedi Training Academy but that's not quite the same thing... Still, the company claims that's enough to wield the force over Jedi Mind.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: jedi, jedi mind, trademark
Companies: jedi mind, lucasfilm

24 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Richard Corsale, 23 Aug 2010 @ 1:19pm

wait, what?
How is this a slam dunk? I mean if they don't own Jedi ... that's like the red baron suing red robin?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Berenerd (profile), 23 Aug 2010 @ 1:29pm

Re: wait, what?
Just looking at the charges they may be using it to fool people into thinking its part of the official thing...though I am unable to read the documents from work today
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 23 Aug 2010 @ 1:29pm

Jedi Religion
How long before they go after these people:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hidden Force, 23 Aug 2010 @ 1:32pm

Re: wait, what?
Or, as a better analogy, DC Comics suing Red Robin for the use of the name of one of its characters.

If it's true that LucasFilm doesn't own a copyright on "Jedi" or "Jedi mind trick," then how do they have any legal legs to stand on?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2010 @ 1:36pm

Re: Jedi Religion
They can claim freedom of religion and that using the name is required by their religion and so they can get away with it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2010 @ 1:45pm

Re: Re: wait, what?
Except Red Robin the restaurant (founded in 1969) predates Red Robin the character which first appeared in 1995's Kingdom Come.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Coco Was Screwed, 23 Aug 2010 @ 1:55pm

Re: Re: Re: wait, what?
And the Song predates the Restaurant by 43 years...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
cc (profile), 23 Aug 2010 @ 2:01pm

Lucasfilm doesn't have the trademark on Jedi and they have no competing products that could confuse consumers (Jedi Mind seem to be selling thought-controlled games and software, apparently).

If they win this outright, it's because the judge was biased and was thinking that Jedi must go to Lucas by default -- but that's not the law, is it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Patrik, 23 Aug 2010 @ 2:21pm

Re:
I think it's pretty safe to say that the court will consider "Jedi" shorthand for "Jedi Knight". I don't think there's any other context, right? I'm no Star Wars geek, but I don't recall any other implication for "Jedi" in the series. All "Jedi" are "Jedi Knights", correct? There aren't any Jedi Nurses or Jedi Lawyers, as far as I know. Well, I've heard the most recent trilogy gets pretty out there with the politics, so maybe there is some sort of Jedi that was never a Jedi knight.

Just as I probably couldn't open a fast food burger joint called Mickey D's or BK, or a chicken joint called KFC (though "Kennedy Fried Chicken" is apparently OK) or a brand of shoes called cons or chucks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Daniel Vaughn (profile), 23 Aug 2010 @ 2:34pm

Oh, references..
I love how LucasFilm refers to this as "restoring balance to the force of the JEDI trademark."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nick Burns (profile), 23 Aug 2010 @ 2:40pm

How long before they go after Jedi's Garden:
http://jedisfamilyrestaurant.homestead.com/

Who have been around for a while, but I only saw them appear in my hometown after the original movies came out.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Patrick Guevara, 23 Aug 2010 @ 2:55pm

"Lucas doesn't actually hold a trademark on 'Jedi' or 'Jedi Mind.'"

How do you know this? I think you mean Lucas does not have trademark registrations for JEDI or JEDI MIND? It is basic trademark law in the US that registration is not necessary to establish trademark rights. Thus, one can own trademarks in the US without registering them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
kryptonianjorel (profile), 23 Aug 2010 @ 3:50pm

Re: Re:
Then maybe LucasArts should have trademarked Jedi instead of Jedi Knights, so that any use of the word 'Jedi' would be covered.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike Masnick (profile), 23 Aug 2010 @ 6:02pm

Re:
How do you know this? I think you mean Lucas does not have trademark registrations for JEDI or JEDI MIND? It is basic trademark law in the US that registration is not necessary to establish trademark rights. Thus, one can own trademarks in the US without registering them.

You're correct. I should have said *registered* trademark. It is entirely possible that they have a strong claim on a common law trademark, which can be quite effective.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Paul Taylor, 24 Aug 2010 @ 5:34am

I wonder what Lucas' legal team have to say about the Hip-Hop group called Jedi Mind Tricks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pete Braven (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 8:27am

Ah, religious zeal!
I can't help but smile at this one. In the last census in the UK, so many people entered 'Jedi Knight' as their religion, it had to become a recognised faith!
Just maybe, Lucas now thinks he is God an will punish all unbelievers?
Next thing will be the use of the word 'force' in teaching physics or maybe the Itallians will retrospectively sue for the use of 'Empire' on behalf or the Romans?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Topgun, 25 Aug 2010 @ 2:10am

Their case is very strong. If you look at the products and services they offer, they are basing it solely on Lucas Arts trademarks. I think Jedi Mind will back down quickly and either draw licensing service through Lucas Arts, or completely change their name.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
phishy, 25 Aug 2010 @ 3:14am

Re: Re:
Not to be a douche, but....

Jedi is the shorthand for Jedi Knight, yet there are several levels, Jedi Knight, Jedi Master, etc etc. Jedi being the key term, the other being a definition of, well I guess Skill level.

Jedi indeed falls to Lucas, how can it not? Say Jedi, what are you thinking. Read the word Jedi, what do you see? If I come into a store and see some thought controlled Jedi named toyed, I'd immediately associate that with the 1 and only instance of the term Jedi in the worlds collective memory, Star Wars.

It's not direct infringement but it's about as close as you can get. Might as well start selling Vader looking costumes named "Barth Dader" you'll still get sued.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Malak (profile), 25 Aug 2010 @ 3:42am

If Jedi was a word that Lucas had appropriated for his space samurai, then other uses would be pretty fair game. However a quick Wikipedia check seem to say that he cooked up the word himself (or at least dragged it up for very deep obscurity, possibly form another language) so I think that it's fair to say that there is some genuine cause to believe that there could be confusion.
Certainly I'd assume that a videogames company called Jedi Mind was a spinoff of Lucas Arts or something...
I can't help but smile at this one. In the last census in the UK, so many people entered 'Jedi Knight' as their religion, it had to become a recognised faith!

Fraid not... :(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedi_census_phenomenon
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Aug 2010 @ 6:21am

look it up, star wars trivia, screw lucas

"The word "Jedi" is derived from the Japanese words "Jidai Geki" which translate as "period adventure drama." A period adventure drama is a Japanese TV soap opera program set in the samurai days. George Lucas mentioned in an interview that he saw a "Jidai Geki" program on TV while in Japan a year or so before the movie was made and liked the word."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bob McDowell, 25 Aug 2010 @ 6:46am

Different Jedi's
Not just Knights, no. Also masters and at least one example of a librarian.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
brinkie, 26 Aug 2010 @ 2:02am

Jedi outside US
There's a Dutch Volkswagen dealership called "Jedi".

http://www.jedi.nl/
http://maps.google.nl/maps?hl=nl&ie=UTF8&q=jedi+zeewolde& ;fb=1&gl=nl&hq=jedi&hnear=Zeewolde&cid=0,0,963899240443440&ei=Tit2TOWTPJGl4AaX7O z9BQ&ved=0CBwQnwIwAQ&layer=c&cbll=52.336822,5.53066&panoid=iT2bg8bwmr7FL1qqdr2GCA&am p;cbp=12,188.98,,2,1.49&ll=52.336781,5.530844&spn=0.007749,0.022724&z=16

The Force in their business has been strong since 1964. So anyone fearing Lucasfilm's lawsuits could consider moving to The Netherlands ;-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
WALSC JOFAY, 10 Mar 2011 @ 2:01am

Lucas Owns Nothing it Has Claimed
I came across an earlier article where it stated that LucasArts said they owned the rights to Oneness with the Universe". Got new for them, the Buddhists came up with that concept over 2000 years ago! And as far as the Jedi name, yes, there were several shows with the name Jidai in them from japan dating all the way back to the '30s. There was also an obscure religious sect in India a long time ago called Jhedi. And for throwing lighting bolts from fingertips, there have been several shows depicting that throughout the years. Moving objects with your mind? People have been trying to do that since prehistoric times. I used to hold George Lucas in such high esteem, but as Yoda said, "Cone is he, consumed by the Dark Side"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
lawyit, 9 Mar 2015 @ 11:05am

Re:
if that happens they can take it to a higher court
[ link to this | view in thread ]