Some Hows and Whys of Free Culture

from the I'm-talking!-again! dept

Tue, Sep 21st 2010 9:30pm — Nina Paley

On July 16th I gave at talk at H.O.P.E. (Hackers On Planet Earth) called "Sita Sings the Blues: a Free Culture Success Story." 9 Minutes of excerpts are below, in which I discuss why I insisted on authentic songs, what is and is not property, how software is culture, the difference between Share Alike (copyleft) and other Creative Commons licenses, why I paid to legally license the old songs, how noncommercial copyright infringement is still illegal, legal costs, benefits of audience sharing & decentralized distribution, the Sita Sings the Blues Merchandise Empire (sitasingstheblues.com/store), open-licensed merch, audience goodwill, how fans support artists, rivalrous vs. non-rivalrous goods, the Creator Endorsed Mark, migrating Flash files to open formats, gift income, commerce without monopolies, why I encourage legal sharing, and more.

For those with longer attention spans, you can watch the entire unedited hour-long talk. It includes even more topics like Minute Memes, cultural lineages, combining vs. originating, many Ramayanas, our impoverished Public Domain, understanding Free Culture, Content vs. Containers, and a more detailed income breakdown of the Sita Free Distribution Project.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: free culture, nina paley

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2010 @ 10:52pm

Migration tools from raster to vector.

Autotrace and XaraExtreme

Tool to transform flv into images:

ffmpeg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2010 @ 11:00pm

e.g.:

ffmpeg -i movie.mpg -f image2 -vcodec mjpeg menu%d.jpg

Source:
http://www.ffmpeg.org/faq.html#SEC15

Also you can transform single images into a movie again.

3.2 How do I encode single pictures into movies?
http://www.ffmpeg.org/faq.html#SEC14

There I have done my good deed of the day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Auditrix (profile), 22 Sep 2010 @ 12:07am

Sita didn't cite her costs
The figures cited by Sita were unlabeled. Are they revenues or profit?

Most importantly, Sita didn't cite her costs. Unlike most film profit accountings, Sita's totaled one year. You can only determine project profitability with an inception-to-date accounting. Not to mention, if you included the prior period, there may be a lot more costs!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Auditrix (profile), 22 Sep 2010 @ 12:10am
  
  Re: Sita didn't cite her costs
  My references to "Sita" above should be replaced with "Ms. Paley." I regret the error.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2010 @ 12:57am
  
  Re: Sita didn't cite her costs
  This is clearly wrong accounting. How can make a movie a positive balance? Hollywood accounting requires massive losses, at least $100M. The data is clearly fake.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Auditrix (profile), 30 Sep 2010 @ 1:47am
    
    Re: Re: Sita didn't cite her costs
    The data have not been presented.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- btrussell (profile), 22 Sep 2010 @ 7:00am
  
  Re: Sita didn't cite her costs
  "Unlike most film profit accountings, Sita's totaled one year. You can only determine project profitability with an inception-to-date accounting."
  
  You mean they don't spread their expenses over the 140 years they expect to profit...?(Or however long copyright is. You know, the matching of expenses to the profit received from those expenditures.)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Auditrix (profile), 30 Sep 2010 @ 1:48am
    
    Re: Re: Sita didn't cite her costs
    No.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- IronM@sk, 22 Sep 2010 @ 10:47pm
  
  Re: Sita didn't cite her costs
  Oh Auditrix you just got wtfpwned by the two above me. OMG there is a new way of thinking that my expensive college degree doesn't cover! Does Nina have to cite her costs if the net gain was her happiness? I had some respect for you since you were actually game enough to have a profile here (and because you are cute), but you pretty much lost it with that comment.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Auditrix (profile), 30 Sep 2010 @ 1:51am
    
    Re: Re: Sita didn't cite her costs
    Nina cited some numbers and it is unclear what they represent.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
lrobbo (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 10:34am

TLDR. Attention span too short . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]