NBC, BBC, Travel Channel: Not Guilty Of Racketeering For Asking People About Ideas For TV Shows
from the ownership-culture dept
When you go around preaching the concept that ideas can be "owned," you're just asking for a lawsuit when you then ask people to voluntarily submit their own ideas. At some point, the Travel Channel put up a website, asking viewers for ideas for new shows. I'm sort of surprised they would do this, seeing as they must have known what would happen next. Some guy submitted an idea that probably a dozen or more people submitted: do a reality show on a family driving around the country in an RV. And, when the Travel Channel, along with NBC and the BBC announced a show called "The Great American Road Trip," the guy Christopher Cardillo insisted it was his idea that was being taken unfairly. So he sued for both copyright infringement and racketeering.Of course, you can't copyright ideas and Cardillo had never actually registered the copyright on the proposal itself anyway, so there was no copyright claim. And, now the court has also tossed out the ridiculous racketeering charge. The idea that setting up a website to solicit show ideas is akin racketeering seems to be a bigger stretch than even some of the most ridiculous lawsuits we see on a daily basis.
Similarly, on the racketeering issue, the court spends a lot of time focusing on how there's no pattern of racketeering from a single incident, but it's not clear that there was even a single incident that is in any way illegal. The idea of doing a reality show of people traveling in RVs around the country is hardly unique, and the actual show is quite different than what Cardillo proposed anyway (his involved just his family driving from the US to South America -- the real show involves a bunch of families around the country involved in a contest).
Still, in the end, it's surprising that in a TV industry made up of folks who keep insisting that ideas can be "owned," that anyone would ever bother to put up a website asking for show ideas, and not expect to get sued.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyoneā€™s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ideas, racketeering, tv shows
Companies: bbc, nbc, travel channel
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So you are surprised that companies who understand copyright would do something that doesn't present any copyright problems ? or are you advocating that people should avoid doing things that are perfectly OK just to avoid frivolous law suites ? !! is techdirt loosing it's plot ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In the same way that many movie studios won't accept scripts over the transom, knowing they might get sued if they later make a similar movie, I would assume the same thing applies for TV studios. They would not ask for ideas, knowing damn well that they would likely get sued later if they used an idea without crediting who submitted it -- even if they came up with it entirely independently.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moma says what..??
20 years ago, this sentence wouldn’t have even been an afterthought, let alone noted by the court. To even suggest that registering "their idea" should play a part in the ruling indicates how the moneyed influence is shaping the court's "ideas"¯.
I can only imagine this is how corporations, ah, I mean "artificial persons" finally gained their current status as "incorporated" people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This surprises me too
I know, an idea isn't copyrightable. But apart from that, so, because something wasn't registered as copyright, it was fatal to the claim?
Could we use this defense in other cases too?
"Because {artist} did not register their copyright, their claim that I violated their copyright is therefore void"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This surprises me too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This surprises me too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ridiculous!
The Dictionary!
Racketeer: someone who commits crimes for profit (especially one who obtains money by fraud or extortion)
So, did the accuser misunderstand the meaning of racketeer, or did he lose his only dictionary in a poker game?
This case should have been thrown out immediately after consulting a dictionary. Its sad that some amount of money (as little as it might have been) was spent processing this claim.
And as for the RV "idea"; this is not new! I've seen this show hundreds of times before! Its available on VHS in living rooms all across America, and Its usually marked: "Home movies of our trip to ..."!
This "idea" is as old as video cameras themselves.
I'm pretty sure the guy who created the first camcorder was thinking: "Now we can film our RV trips to Niagara Falls!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
travel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]