DailyDirt: It *IS* Rocket Science, Actually...
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Getting stuff into space is difficult. There are a bunch of different rockets that have been used over the last few decades, but the odds of a launch failure isn't quite zero yet. A few companies are making cheaper launch systems, but a perfect track record is hard to maintain over more than a handful of launches. Perhaps that's why sentient robots in the movies never think about leaving the Earth behind.- SpaceX's recent Falcon 9 failure is a huge setback for SpaceX -- because the exact problem hasn't been identified yet. This incident will delay future launches until the cause of the explosion can be reasonably explained. [url]
- NASA's development of its Space Launch System (SLS) is going through its own delays, as reviewing committees are concerned that NASA is wasting $150 million on an interim rocket stage that will not be used again -- instead of putting that money towards a more powerful Exploration Upper Stage (EUS). Building an unmanned rocket stage that will need to be replaced someday by a stage that is rated for a crew doesn't seem to be a great use of limited NASA funding, but lacking the full funding to directly build an astronaut-friendly, Beyond Earth Orbit (BEO) vehicle forces NASA to create interim test stages. Our tax dollars at work.... [url]
- Three failed resupply missions to the International Space Station (ISS) have occurred over the last 8 months. Orbital Sciences is shifting away from using 1960s-era Soviet rocket engines that were probably the cause of its launch failure last October. In May, a Russian re-supply mission put its cargo in the wrong orbit. And SpaceX's investigations are ongoing for its recent Falcon 9 explosion. There are actually a few other options for getting supplies to the ISS, and Orbital Sciences will be employing alternative launch systems to fulfill its contract while it works on its replacement engines. [url]
- The idea of using reusable rockets isn't unique to SpaceX. Blue Origin's New Shepard is being tested for its re-usability. The United Launch Alliance (ULA) has plans for a reusable Vulcan rocket that is recovered by helicopter. Airbus has also unveiled its reusable Adeline design which could start test launches in 2025. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adeline, beo, eus, falcon 9, iss, new shepard, re-usable rockets, rocket technology, rockets, sls, space, space exploration, vulcan
Companies: airbus, blue origins, nasa, orbital sciences, spacex, ula
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Space Launchers Should Fail Often.
For unmanned systems, the optimum point is probably about 20-25% mission losses. That strikes a balance between needlessly expensive launches and losing too many payloads. If launcher components are durable enough to stand recycling, then they are probably too heavy. NASA got trapped in the politics of having to pretend that the Space Shuttle was a kind of airliner, when it was actually a kind of expendable munition, and two crews were killed in consequence.
A profitable space business is going to focus on launching information satellites, that is communications satellites, navigation satellites, and mapping/reconnaissance satellites. It is going to strictly avoid re-enacting the plots of 1960 television shows about faster-than-light star-ships.
The kind of research which is carried out in the manned space program generally turns out to be about the physiology and psychology of astronauts in space, which tends to be useful for little except a manned space program. Physics and chemistry are sufficiently well understood in general that experiments can be done by remote control.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You can have, at most, only two of the three on any particular project. This has been painfully obvious on multiple occasions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Space Launchers Should Fail Often.
yeah the only reason to send people up these days is to do political stunts.
As for spacex, have you guys seen the video? It wasnt an explosion, it clearly moved to another dimension. They are really onto something there. ^__^
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lemons in Space
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AI leaving, includes spoilers
So, there are movies out there.
Also, AIs being software (granted, most complex enough to cause problems for humans are probably huge files), it could wait to verify the launch was successful before uploading itself. It could also leave behind/ send a copy, if it so chose. Almost noone ever considers that an AI can copy itself & act like a virus (again, I'm pretty sure at least a couple anime deal w/ that scenario).
For those curious about Expelled from Paradise, & are into anime, imagine Spike Spiegel & Haruhi Suzumiya (personalities & English voices) tracking down a hacker in a post-apocalyptic desert together, where cyberization has advanced past that in Ghost in the Shell.
[ link to this | view in thread ]