DailyDirt: It's 11:57pm... Do You Know Where Your Nuclear Bombs Are?

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

The Doomsday Clock says it's 3 minutes to midnight -- the same time it was in 1949. Sure, plenty of people are saying we're not building new nuclear bombs, and we have some pieces of paper that say some countries (ahem, Iran) aren't going to build new nukes. But... tick tock. Are we really any safer from nuclear self-annihilation? After you've finished checking out those links, take a look at our Daily Deals for cool gadgets and other awesome stuff.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: b61, b61-12, bombs, doomsday clock, nuclear bombs, nuclear powers, nuclear testing, weapons


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jul 2015 @ 5:18pm

    with politicians for sale to the highest bidder does anyone really think we are safe entrusting them with the keys to destroying the world

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    he is just a poor boy!!!, 16 Jul 2015 @ 6:22pm

    Let me goooo!

    I have the fire department and the building inspectors right hear, of course I have bars on all my windows so.. :(

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jul 2015 @ 6:37pm

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 16 Jul 2015 @ 7:33pm

    Guess What The ...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Jul 2015 @ 12:53am

    Im truly disappointed you didn't actually post this at 11:57 pm ...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Jul 2015 @ 6:38am

    Yep, weird how close people will push us to oblivion because are bored at work.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Jul 2015 @ 9:10am

    The number of "weapons"...

    Are we talking about the actual warhead or just the launcher?

    A lot of folks don't realize that the SALT/START treaties of the 70's & 80's only reduced the number of launchers, not the warheads. So the US and (the then) USSR destroyed a number of rockets, bombers, and submarines. While that's OK, the warheads that were deployed on said rockets, bombers, and submarines still existed and were placed in bunkers and munitions depots in various places. Hopefully like regular munitions the triggering devices were stored elsewhere.

    Rockets, bombers, and submarines can be used for other missions that do not involve nuclear weapons. At least one Minuteman squadron has satellite packages, not warheads. But a nuclear warhead can only be used for it's designed mission. How many warheads are enough? We could debate that question endlessly. Like other issues in the present day the public got mis-lead with SALT/START into thinking that the world would be safer with fewer 'weapons'. That would be a great sentiment had they destroyed actual weapons instead of only the launcher.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. icon
    JoeCool (profile), 17 Jul 2015 @ 10:23am

    Re: Guess What The ...

    It's no longer '00000000'? Well then, it's almost certainly '12345678' now.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    charliebrown (profile), 18 Jul 2015 @ 11:11pm

    Last Year Tonight

    John Oliver already covered this last year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y1ya-yF35g

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.