Media Copyright Group Sues US Copyright Group Over Trademark Threat

from the that's-what-you-get dept

Tue, Oct 12th 2010 11:56am — Mike Masnick

We had just written about the rise of a bunch of new pre-settlement shakedown shops, who send out massive amounts of lawsuits over claims of file sharing in order to get people to pay up. Just recently, some had noticed that these firms all seem to copy from each other, and now two of the firms may be heading to court over it. Seriously.

An anonymous reader passed along the news that the Media Copyright Group -- which was set up recently by a divorce lawyer to work with porn providers -- has filed for declaratory judgment against US Copyright Group, the offshoot of Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver (the firm that was the first to get attention for bringing these sorts of pre-settlement deals to the US). We had already noted that US Copyright Group appeared to have copied its website from a competitor, but apparently even though US Copyright Group thinks it's okay to copy others, it doesn't like anyone else copying it. A lawyer from Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver sent a cease and desist to Media Copyright Group, alleging trademark infringement. Media Copyright Group filed for a declaratory judgment that it is not infringing:

All I can say is that there's something quite amusing about watching two of these law firms suing each other in court, arguing over whether or not one infringed on the other's "intellectual property."

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, pre-settlement, trademark
Companies: media copyright group, us copyright group

19 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:11pm

I wonder if U.S. Copyright Group will counterclaim for copyright infringement for stealing direct quotes from their pleadings. Hope so. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RD, 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:15pm

Gotta love it
No so f*cking funny now that the shoe is on the other foot, is it? Scumbags.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:18pm

arstechnica has the story too: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/10/p2p-law-firms-now-threatening-each-other.ars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
:Lobo Santo (profile), 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:29pm

reasonable solution
Obviously, the only reasonable solution for firms of nothing-but-blood-sucking-lawyers to settle their differences: Chainsaw cage-match! Live on Pay-Per-View, the winner(s?) keep a large portion of the proceeds, everybody wins.

: D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:44pm
  
  Re: reasonable solution
  You just KNOW there will have to be a rematch to determine who gets the distribution rights!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 1:54pm
    
    Re: Re: reasonable solution
    Of the limbs?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Killer_Tofu (profile), 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:45pm
  
  Re: reasonable solution
  And by proceeds we mean they are considered the lawsuit winner, and have the prestigious glory of keeping their competitor's dismembered body.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:42pm

no such thing
There is no such thing as "intellectual property".

There is only "Imaginary Profitables".

Live by it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:45pm

Eureka! We shall call it "Silverlight"!
I think the best thing we can do to control copyright is look at pre-settlement shakedowns of people with unauthorized flash usage. This will make it so people can't watch videos or listen to music while at work.

It solves a lot of problems and keeps people ignorant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jay (profile), 12 Oct 2010 @ 12:59pm

Mr Kettle...
Mr Pot would like a word with you. He has a baseball bat and cement, Armani suit, and a few "friends" to make sure you get the point.

The only thing I can say is that perhaps you should consider a new area for work. Preferably one that doesn't involve writing with your left hand. You see, his friends are a little... itchy. And they can be quite thorough in making sure you understand every last word they say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 1:01pm

Just a comment to note that neither of these groups are engaged in anything I would even remotely call the practice of IP law. The fact they appear to be engaged in an IP matter does not mean they are actively engaged in the practice of such law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 12 Oct 2010 @ 1:10pm
  
  Re:
  Practice of IP law, bastardization of IP law, at this point who can tell the difference?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will Sizemore (profile), 12 Oct 2010 @ 1:39pm

There should be a fine plaintiffs pay for crap lawsuits that waste time and don't have any positive effect on our society.

The way things are now, what do law firms really have to lose when a case is dismissed or when they fight each other like this? They pay filing fees, and documentation fees, sure, but who pays for the rest of it? The firms taking cases for Intellectual Property suits still get paid by the parties they represent, right?

If I was the judge hearing this case, I'd throw the case out and fine both of these parties for wasting the Court's time. I'd set the fines at actual cost to the government of the proceedings and multiply by 1.5. Then I'd order that all funds be directed to an ad campaign dissuading the misuse of government resources for something so petty as using such generic terms as a name for which to conduct business, and expecting anything less than the confusion of uninformed consumers.

I think that NO ONE should be allowed to copyright or patent anything that uses generic terms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 3:31pm

what did the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy say about lawyers?
cant say its copyrighted
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2010 @ 4:18pm

They are just like vultures all tearing at the same carcass. And like with vultures, they fight amongst themselves to see who gets to eat the biggest pieces of the (rotting) meat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
abc gum, 12 Oct 2010 @ 5:03pm

What if all the IP scammers send a letter to the same person?
Is there any protection from double jeopardy?

Innocent person: "Hey, I already beat so 'n so lawyers in court for that crap."

Other Lawyers: "That does not matter, we are suing you too."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mike allen (profile), 13 Oct 2010 @ 2:01am

let the animals fight it out with any luck both will be vulture meat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Oct 2010 @ 11:03am

Eriq Gardner from THR, Esq. just tweeted: "US Copyright Group settles dispute with Media Copyright Group over trademark rights to name. Anti-piracy firms learn to co-exist."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dana Robinson, 14 Oct 2010 @ 10:13am

such irony
I'm always prowling for interesting IP law news for a class I teach. Last night was a news article about aggressive new "copyright" trolls. This one is classic. I'll have to include it in the next class. Let the trolls beat each other up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]