DailyDirt: Asteroids Are Not Just An 80s Video Game
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Dwarf planets and other rocky space objects have been in the news recently, thanks to the New Horizons spacecraft flying by Pluto. Rocky space objects much closer to the Earth are getting some attention, too, especially after the Chelyabinsk meteor exploded over Russia in 2013. No one saw that one coming, and a bigger rock would have done a lot more damage. Near-Earth space objects are literally all around us, so check out the links below if you have any- Planetary Resources recently launched its A3R satellite from the International Space Station, and it plans to demonstrate its ability to detect valuable space resources for future space mining operations. Prospecting resource-rich asteroids could take a while to find suitable near-Earth space rocks, and there are lots of asteroids out there. [url]
- The Earth has one moon, right? But we also have at least one resonant asteroid (2014 OL339). This asteroid has an orbit that coincides with our planet's orbit. It won't collide with us, and there are a few other asteroids that appear to be quasi-satellites for our planet, too. Asteroids like these could be easier to visit than the moon, and they might become desirable rest stops on the way to other places in our solar system. [url]
- Asteroid hunting software developed by NASA and Planetary Resources combines several algorithms submitted to the Asteroid Data Hunter challenge. Anyone can help identify dangerous asteroids that are headed our way, even though it might not be enough to prevent an impact. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 2014 ol339, a3r satellite, asteroid data hunter, asteroid mining, asteroids, chelyabinsk meteor, iss, moon, resonant asteroid, satellites, space, space objects
Companies: nasa, planetary resources
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why look for valuable asteroids for mining?
There's the problem of actually landing on a moving asteroid, mining the materials and then getting them back to Earth. How do you safely re-enter the Earth's orbit carrying the weight of enough ore/metal to make the entire mission cost effective?
I don't think automated or remote controlled mining rigs are going to get the job done. They can't be controlled in real-time or know how to deal with unexpected situations and letting them decide for themselves what's most valuable is a crapshoot.
Getting a human to an asteroid and back doesn't look like it's going to happen any time in the near future either. We can barely get people up to the ISS and back.
There are also risks involved. The old adage "Don't touch that, you don't know where it's been!" applies. If there is other life in the universe, how do we know that the asteroid isn't carrying alien bacteria? Or that it doesn't contain a new form of radiation twice as deadly as anything on Earth? Have scientists now discovered and cataloged everything in the universe such that they can say with absolute certainty that asteroids will never contain anything dangerous?
Not that I think we should let fear dominate exploration, but there's a difference between bringing back a few samples of moon rocks in closely monitored conditions and bringing back hundreds of pounds of ore mined from an asteroid.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why look for valuable asteroids for mining?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Once the system is in place and self sustainable the only import for a long while will be skilled labour and exports limited to stuff that would be cheaper and easier to manufacture up top.
Heck, solar power would be a major export with microwave energy beamed to multi kilometer antennas in remote regions with next to no indigenous life that would be at risk under such antennas.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why look for valuable asteroids for mining?
Technology.
Space based mining would let Humans use far more energy gathering/use techniques than planet based ones along with removing biosphere concerns of processing ore into refined metal. Why return the ore when you can return refined material? (Heat dissipation from the work is an issue....too bad hydrios arn't real as that could be a heat pump to vent process heat in a controllable way)
There are also risks involved
Alien bacteria is a far less risk than the high ground of such an operation being turned into a weapon to attack the population at the bottom of the gravity well of Earth.
If you have to pick a threat to Man - I'd lay odds on Man being an ass to their fellow Man VS 'alien bacteria'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stupid idea that just won't die.
The energy ROI is one reason. Another is the use as a weapon. If Humans can't get things like a Jeep or a TV right and such can be used against the owner - why do people keep thinking spaced-based power that can be sent Earthside is gonna work out any better?
Fukushima is an example of how well Man manages Man's technology.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Give Me a Break
What we need is to be more careful about where the mined material we have already extracted ends up. We live in a throw away world where profit is the only concern. If we were smart, we'd be spending money on recycling, recovery, and restoration plans in order to make sure all elements we use go back into their natural cycled system so that our planet is still a viable place to live 150 years from now.
It was easy to get lost in the distraction of daily life in the 50s, when we could still lie to ourselves and see our world as so vast and our impact so minimal as just on drop in an ocean.
Today we know better, we know we cannot afford to engage in any industry that is not sustainable, yet we daily justify all of our current despicable practices because mankind would rather stick it's head in the sand and dream inhabiting or mining other Celestial Bodies
It's pathetic and sad
[ link to this | view in thread ]