Getting Closer To Autonomous Cars: Vans Make The Trip From Italy To China

from the marco...-polo... dept

Fri, Oct 29th 2010 3:10pm — Mike Masnick

Back in July we mentioned that some researchers had begun an attempt to have an autonomous vehicle drive safely from Italy to China. Then, about a month ago, we also noted that Google had been successfully testing autonomous vehicles on the roads as well. Now, Slashdot alerts us to the news that the Italy to China effort was completed successfully. As with the Google experiments, it wasn't "perfect." Apparently, humans had to intervene during a Moscow traffic jam -- and at toll booths. They also mention that "at one point, a van stopped to pick up hitchhikers." That's quite a story the hitchhikers must have left with... Either way, it's nice to see so much research going on in this field. Hopefully we can start to see some of that research make its way into actual production vehicles, at least to improve accident reduction techniques.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: autonomous vehicles, cars

18 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 3:23pm

Does this mean that if adopted "texting" would then be OK?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
KnownHuman (profile), 29 Oct 2010 @ 3:25pm

Who Stands to Benefit
This area of research should rather interesting to watch in terms of future business potential. It would be interesting to see the beverage and hospitality industry really get behind this, while the taxi (and to a lesser extent, insurance) industries argue against autonomous vehicles.

Imagine the potential drop in drunk driving accidents.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 3:31pm

Re:
By practical means yes, by the law no, laws don't die they need to be repealed, why no one makes laws with expiration dates are beyond me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 3:35pm

Robotics is a fantastic field.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Robert Ring, 29 Oct 2010 @ 3:42pm

That's hilarious. Van: "I think we should stop and pick these guys up."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 3:44pm

Re: Who Stands to Benefit
Well, hard to say how insurance companies will respond. It depends entirely if their profit margins would be better or worse with lower accident rates (you'd only be reducing major accidents, not minor bumps and scratches).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ryan Diederich, 29 Oct 2010 @ 4:06pm

Several Things...
Of course insurance companies would benefit; the odds of an accident occuring (this is what they base their rates on) go down. They get to offer a lower price if they desire, and pocket the difference.

Anyways, I will never in my life give complete control of a vehicle to a machine. This is all well and good, and it should hit the brakes for me if Im in danger and whatever, but it shouldnt do everything.

Remember the guy who followed his GPS up a goat run?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 4:22pm

Re: Several Things...
Actually a robotic car could have prevented that, they can react faster and are always alert and use GPS as part of the system, with lasers and radar also, but I do get the point.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 4:30pm

Lets hope terrorists can't use this to drive autonomous vehicles into buildings.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 4:33pm

Re: Who Stands to Benefit
What about autonomous package delivery vehicles. A car has a package and only the sender and receiver of the package have the keys to the car. The car simply drives from the sender to the receiver and the receiver then opens the car, takes the package, and locks it back up. The car drives back.

Quick, I should get a patent!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 4:38pm

Re: Re: Who Stands to Benefit
(this is intended for large businesses that send lots of stuff back and forth across warehouses of course).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bob, 29 Oct 2010 @ 5:40pm

Re: Re:
I know of two laws that have or had an expiration date, one will soon usher in the largest tax increase in US history.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Oct 2010 @ 10:51pm

Autonomous Google Street View patrols
Autonomous Google Street View patrols.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
technomage (profile), 30 Oct 2010 @ 9:04am

I heareby welcome our autonomous roving overlords....
...as long as it revives the trans am line and gets William Daniels to voice the speech synthesis of the cars!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
F1Mikal, 30 Oct 2010 @ 12:36pm

I believe someone from google said that if the computer was invented before the car, people would never have had to learn to drive & there would never have been any drunk driver deaths.

hmmm.

Humans. Their own worst enemy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
tax cpe, 31 Oct 2010 @ 2:14am

autonomous?
Autonomous meaning these vans were traipsing around with no human drivers? That's dangerous!!! Even with precision robots, there is still a huge margin of error, in my opinion.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Oct 2010 @ 4:44pm

So what happens if the computer operating the vehicle gets a virus - would it get a ticket for driving while impaired ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), 1 Nov 2010 @ 7:35am

Re: Who Stands to Benefit
I'd imagine the taxi companies would be all for this - think if they could eliminate most of their labor expenses while at the same time making their entire fleet of vehicles available 24/7. Big profits.

Once these things are proven safe and reliable, insurance companies will love them. They could offer marginally lower rates while greatly reducing their costs for accidents. Big profits. And if something goes wrong - you can bet they'll be suing the manufacturers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]