Author Tries Honest Approach To File Sharers: Not Upset, But If You Want To Support Me, Here's How
from the good-for-him dept
Jay Roberts points us to an increasingly common occurrence that we've been seeing lately. Rather than flipping out and going ballistic over file sharing, software engineer and author (of a book on iPhone game development) Steffen Itterheim discovered (as he expected) that his book was available on file sharing networks, but rather than freak out, he just posted a nice letter saying he totally understood why people were file sharing, and then asked politely for people who wanted to support his work to buy a copy of the book -- and provided easy links for them to do so. While I'm not convinced this strategy is as sustainable as focusing on giving people real scarce reasons to buy, it's still nice to see more folks not reacting in angry ways that tend to only make the problem worse.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: books, file sharing, steffen itterheim
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Surely he can sell them a t-shirt.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is Ricky Gervais the original Anonymous Coward?
So did you see The Daily Show where Ricky Gervais trolled the show? If you missed it, here's a link:
http://www.tvguide.com/News/Ricky-Gervais-Daily-Show-1026819.aspx
In the spirit of Steve Gibson and everyone around here, I have to say that the full capabilities of the iPhone platform has are yet to be discovered. About a month ago, I found an iPhone app called Layar. It's an augmented reality app from a company out of the Netherlands.
Using Layar, I can augment reality around me based on a variety of sources such as Tweets, Panoramio, and Flickr. It almost makes you wish you removed the EXIF info from your pictures, doesn't it? Also, it makes you kinda wish that Mike embraced the worldwide platform behind it to have a $2.99 app in the app store.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Scarcities
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Scarcity based book sales
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Scarcity based book sales
Personally, my problem with Mike's "scarce goods" argument has always been that I'm really, absolutely not a "scarce goods" kind of person, and I don't have any love of ruthlessly exploiting that aspect of my personality.
I'd rather meet the content creators halfway and pay out some token amount for their infinite goods, and leave the scarce goods to people who want to fill their homes with data-bearing objects.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Scarcity based book sales
Just a note: scarce goods are not limited to *tangible* goods. In fact, that's a rather small percentage of the scarce goods I normally talk about.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100125/1631147893.shtml
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Scarcity based book sales
Nothing has to be all-or-nothing anymore.
The Scarce Goods argument seems like it is more for the old-school content industry thinking patterns. "But if we are not selling them plastic discs with some mylar stuck on, we have nothing to sell! Nothing! Dooooom!"
and then you take them by the hand and show that that you can make more money charging more people less, or more money by charging fewer people more, or (oddly) sometimes even more money by charging them nothing at all because it makes them want this other thing, or that thing over there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is Ricky Gervais the original Anonymous Coward?
(Totally off-topic, I know, but it's seriously hilarious!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Allways justifying the freeloaders..
The only difference it will make is that he will probably not bother to write books of that type anymore...
Especially, as he knows there is no point, everyone is going to steal it anyway, he is not going to break even for the time he spend learning the subject then writing about it..
So if you were hoping for more of this guy, updated or with new technology, or maybe his is just a very good and clear teacher..
So he is not rewarded for his effort, he is not paid enough to pay for his effort.. So next time.. there wont be a next time..
Most good writers, and programmers, are not also stupid.. and they also tend to need things like food, houses and so on.. things that cost money..
That he does not get because some morons what something for free.. Something that means nothing to them, they refuse to even attribute value to it.. yet for the creator of that work it might mean everything to him, it might mean the difference between eating or not..
Or taking the risk of not being able to eat, if you spend your time and effort on a creation, that someone else will steal and profit from on your behalf..
And its illegal, immoral, inconsiderate, immature, and a few other 'ills' im sure !!..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Allways justifying the freeloaders..
As some1 else mentioned in the comments, who would pay for the book after you already got it for free? Why as me to buy what I already have?
And yes its free because thats what the price of online text is.
Maybe he is a good writer, maybe he is a good programmer/engineer, maybe he writes good applications (which have more profitability than books). Maybe in these subjects he's pretty smart.
But it is clear throughout all of this that in business, he's stupid.
Now he may not write another book again, but its not because don't value his text, its because he failed to monetize his endeavor into writing.
And if people steal his book and then profit from it, that means they figured out a way to monetize the information that he was unable to.
There's a million ways he could have been smart and made money as an author and programmer/engineer, but he chose to tell people to pay him for something they already have - thats just straight bad business and a huge waste of resources.
So maybe I'll look this guy up if I need to write some programs, and i'll probably "steal" his book. What he should do is check the internet for a book he can steal on how to make money in his profession.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Allways justifying the freeloaders..
I wanted to purchase a paper copy of a particular book on DSLR photography, but found the price to be to high (upwards of $120). The author also sold the exact same book for $20, in PDF form. I could have easily just searched online and downloaded it for free off the internet, but I bought the PDF. Why? Because it included free updates to the book if the information changed, I was added to his newsletter that included techniques to improve the quality and composition of my photography, and I can purchase tickets to his conferences/lectures in advance before they go on sale to the general public.
What is the other guy doing to give the customers a reason to buy, besides just asking?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Then you read stories about companies suing grandmothers for 10 songs and wish they would go bankrupt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Near a dear to me
I strongly believe that software in general will be $free (not wants to or should be, but will be). I do, however, struggle on how I would make a living with software, after I've produced it, without charging for the actual software. May have to just keep charging for my time (which does seem to work well).
The way I see it this is just getting started and physical goods are going to start following the same trends. I can certainly see a point where the entire supply line for a product is completely automated with little or no marginal cost. Watching the reaction of these content producers I'm a little afraid of the reaction when the marginal cost of many/most/all physical goods approaches zero.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
free downloads of books
I've written a hacker novel that is online at no charge - cyberhug.me *hackers fighting for human rights* - that I will re-edit and sell in 2011 as an inexpensive e-book on Amazon, the Nook, Kindle, iPod, etc.
Cory Doctorow quoting someone else, stated something like "It's not copies that threaten authors, but obscurity."
[ link to this | view in thread ]