Leaked State Department Cable Shows 'Behind The Scenes' US Embassy Involvement In Swedish Copyright Issues
from the no-surprise-there dept
It's long been common knowledge that US diplomats have had a heavy hand in other country's copyright laws but, with the Wikileaks release of State Department cables, we're finally seeing some actually confirmation of that. We've already covered the US's involvement in Spain's proposed copyright changes and now a Swedish television station claims to have a cable (not yet released by Wikileaks) that shows heavy "behind the scenes" involvement by the US Embassy in Swedish copyright law.
Why do I get the feeling that "all stakeholders" seemed to leave out the public and actual content consumers who were (as stated) very much against the US government's position on copyright laws. However, the cable also lays out six specific items that the US Embassy hoped the Swedish government would follow through on with regards to copyright law... and apparently five of the six have since been implemented. So despite the public being very much against these ideas, the US government (at the urging of the US entertainment industry) directly meddled in Swedish copyright policy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, sweden, the pirate bay, us embassy, wikileaks
Companies: the pirate bay, wikileaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hope sunde has fun with this
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dont forget biden steakholders
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Really?
Using Copyright has the ability to deliberately denigrate quality of life by removing/controlling manufacturing capability so that only rights-holders and China have the ability to produce. Basically, it will further the social welfare system, with results similar to the US: high unemployment, business consolidation, then outsourced manufacturing base.
Copyright as we know it today will still exist, but in a different form as the current form is quite incompatible within a progressive, Postmodern culture such as Sweden.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It's not that we don't recognize the reality of the situations, we just abhor the hypocrisy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Way it Works
[ link to this | view in thread ]
People vs. the Government
But they should not have...
It is still the case that Politicians are employees of the people and will have to fight for the rights and best situation for the people. If not they shall be fired.
In this sense, we, the People, may never give up on pursuing what is right for all of us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
> just be invalid in regard to copyright
This doesn't prove any law invalid at all. The laws were still passed by the Swedish government according to their legal process. The fact that US had an interest in them doing so doesn't invalidate the law itself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Please don't link to wikileaks information on the front page
It shouldn't matter but the fact is it does. Don't drive people away by 'tainting' the summaries with links and content that can be viewed as questionable.
specifically on this article http://imgur.com/pptOw. I have no idea if that particular link is a URL shortener or directly linking to Wikileaks content. Certainly it would seem to be showing content from the latest Wikileaks dump.
I respect that this information may be needed and relevant to the article, but at least put it in the part of the summary that doesn't show up on the front page.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Questionable by who? You? The USG? Give me a list of what is questionable. You are asking mike to do the same thing the USG and RIAA is-are trying to do. Get him to self censor.
Try doing a google search on 1p2p3p and see what happens.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Really? Holy shit! You make North Korea look like a bastion of freedom!
Land of the sheep, home of the scared?
Baaaaa! Baaaaa!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Please don't link to wikileaks information on the front page
Imgur is a photo hosting site. All that is is hosting an image I uploaded. It's not a URL shortener or directly linking to Wikileaks content.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Sweden: America's Poodle."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
That is what kills me most about this current legal situation. Corporations should not have rights, and should not be able to make laws. Until Corporations can serve in the military, vote, sit on a Jury, and get sentenced to prison for their crimes and sit on death row for murder, they aren't persons and should not be "people."
People within a corporation can vote a certain way, and though it should be illegal, corporations may require their employees to vote a particular way...but corporations should not be allowed to pay bribes to politicians, buy laws, or have any rights or privileges afforded to humans.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
B) If it did, I don't understand how you all think that what the State Department was trying to accomplish here was somehow wrong. One of the things the American people have going for them is that the society draws many intelligent people from around the world and becomes a bastion of ideas. The only way to monetize those ideas is through copyright laws. America stands to benefit from the protection of intellectual property rights and the government is simply using it's influence toward that end. How is that wrong? That is EXACTLY what I pay taxes for.
C) I'm not going to say that I've never illegally downloaded music but how anyone can make the case that taking someone else's creation without compensating them for it should be legal is beyond me. Intellectual property rights are one of the bases of our civilization. Do you want to see film and music go the way of "citizen" journalism? A plethora of underfinanced people doing something in their spare time that's really a full time job?
[ link to this | view in thread ]