French National Assembly Approves Internet Censorship Law
from the lovely dept
We were just talking about how Thai government officials were admitting that internet blacklists simply don't work, and along comes France's National Assembly to approve a law to set up a blacklist allowing the government to censor any website it doesn't like. The full law isn't passed yet, apparently, as it still needs to be approved by a variety of others before it becomes a law. There's also some hope that the French Constitutional Council would refuse to validate the law.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blacklist, censorship, france, free speech, internet, internet filter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
french internet sutsown
color it gone.....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This Just In...
Topping next weeks legislative agenda: Solar Eclipses.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: french internet sutsown
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh, because it blocks sites that illegally traffic in copyrighted works?
Your entire defense is going to be to try and pimp the First Amendment to excuse illegal behavior?
Good luck with that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
But why let reading get in the way of your desperation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
In other words, a bill allowing the Ministry of Interior to decide to decide to block things, without messy details like courts or charges. The bill is touted to be designed to fight kiddie porn, because that is a free pass for passing almost anything.
The government deciding what people are allowed to see or talk about.. that is certainly not censorship, right? And this blacklisting power would never be abused to further someones political ambitions, never.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
More generally, I think it's healthy for the www to be challenged by stupidity, control and other forms of recuperations: it grows from it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Be sure to let us know when that happens...
Until then, what you're talking about is nothing but an attempt at FUD.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It is a tool of the democratic forces and cannot be allowed.
When the “Global Warming” scam came several months ago the Internet destroyed their science. Now is the TSA humiliation of citizens including the old and disable, women and children. Pictures of TSA taking advantage of these vulnerable citizens are displayed all over going viral. So it needs to disappear and fast.
The Internet is creating too many headaches to the NAZI elite. They want you to have your news from ABC, NBC, CNN, CBS, etc. Then you will see news like this: “In a recent CBS News poll, 4 out of 5 Americans supported the use of full-body scans.” ----- LIES, LIES and LIES.
The way we are going we are not going to have another election and if we have one it will be totally controlled.
Oh I forgot!! And …. If you behave and follow their instructions they will give you a nice brown shirt.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Let's remove all checks on government power until they start abusing it. Just ignore the reasons why those checks were there in the first place.
The word shill gets thrown around way too much, but come on. At least try to hide the fact that you'll disagree with whatever Mike says.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090319/0834254178.shtml
"The list of more than 2300 websites is about half child pornography and half "online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist."
yeah, i think that was a pretty good example, Thanks wikileaks!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
At which point they will have access to what is left at the end of the obama administration.
sarc
Pretty cool thing. The only things I really want access to are government press releases. I now understand how they have my best interests in mind. How they watch out for me. How all things will be better if I just sit back and listen and allow them spoon feed me information.
YES!!! YESSS!!! YESSS! *with a side of pancakes* gotta change my shorts!!!
/sarc
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: french internet sutsown
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why its the UNREVOLUTION
Acting stupid , retarded? WHY YES cause no french can read this we can say anything now about them and they cant hear it ....
FRENCH FRIES anyone?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why its the UNREVOLUTION
Je suis Français et je lis ce blog a tout les jours.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why its the UNREVOLUTION
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
France will never be happy with the internet
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why this is a good thing ...
.p2p DNS (and its ilk)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Like any tool, it depends on the use, what is blocked, etc. The Australian example was excessive because they not only attempting to block the obviously illegal, but tries to take it one step further and use it as a moral standards tool. Few people will tolerate that sort of stupidity.
Moves like this from governments may fail, but there is an underlying current that people need to understand: They are not going to tolerate a wide open, unlimited, and unregulated internet forever. Mark France down as another country who would want to do away with the anonymous nature of the internet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sure, you won’t be able to see it, but it’s still out there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They're french...
Seriously... what did we expect from them?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
m n
[ link to this | view in thread ]