DailyDirt: Looking For Life In All The Wrong Places?

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

The chemistry of what we consider biology may be common throughout the universe, but that doesn't necessarily mean that life is also abundant on other worlds. Chemists have tried to re-create the conditions that might have resulted in current biochemistry, but zapping inanimate precursor chemicals hasn't (yet?) generated any kind of life (that wasn't based on an existing, known lifeform -- ie. Venter kinda cheated). Here are some astrochemists looking for clues that might help us understand the origins of life. If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: astrochemistry, biochemistry, biology, extraterrestrial life, homochirality, interstellar space, life


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2013 @ 5:07pm

    Missed a link!

    http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/765/2/111/

    The hypothesis of an exogenous origin and delivery of biologically important molecules to early Earth presents an alternative route to their terrestrial in situ formation. Dipeptides like Gly-Gly detected in the Murchison meteorite are considered as key molecules in prebiotic chemistry because biofunctional dipeptides present the vital link in the evolutionary transition from prebiotic amino acids to early proteins.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2013 @ 7:01pm

    Not going to happen

    Since we were created and not evolved they can shock all the primordial ooze they want and they will never create life.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    teka, 13 Mar 2013 @ 7:38pm

    Re: Not going to happen

    tagged as funny. Keep the hits rollin!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    JustSomeGuy, 14 Mar 2013 @ 12:04am

    Wow, just wow!

    Some bods managed to pick out two molecules at a distance of some 400 light years. They must have REALLY good eyesight.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Mar 2013 @ 6:03am

    "that doesn't necessarily mean that life is also abundant on other worlds"

    Of course not.

    "but zapping inanimate precursor chemicals hasn't (yet?) generated any kind of life (that wasn't based on an existing, known lifeform"

    So what's the point here? ... Surely it is not implied this is proof of life not existing elsewhere, because that would be silly.

    As most people realize, it is difficult to prove a negative. Makes one wonder why it is such a popular pass time.

    It is highly unlikely that life does not exist elsewhere. It is interesting that many start with the premise that it does not rather than it does. I suppose it is due to them thinking they are special.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    samuel-12, 14 Mar 2013 @ 12:59pm

    synthia

    Venter didn't cheat. He didn't even created Synthia.

    This Synthetic bacteria was developped by the DOD at fort Detrick back in 2002. It was discovered May 17 2002.

    the bacteria was ready for depolyment by 2003. They tested it and knew when to realease it!

    The BP oil spill disaster was no accident! Both BP and Craig venter Are scapegoat for what is about to hit us!

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.