DailyDirt: Measuring Human Intelligence
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
The measurement of human intelligence is far from a settled science. IQ tests are very misleading, and unfortunately, some people assign far too much importance to IQ scores. There's plenty of room for improvement, but brain scans or a battery of cognitive skill tests probably shouldn't be used for employment or educational opportunities -- no matter how advanced we might think the tests might be. Still, there will probably be plenty of other misguided ideas for any data we have on people's intelligence.- Human intelligence may be difficult to measure quantitatively, but fMRI brain scans might be able to capture "brain fingerprints" that could serve to estimate various cognitive abilities. Obviously, there would be ethical issues surrounding a brain scan for predicting any individual's talents or lack thereof -- but imagine instead of taking an SAT exam, just sitting for an fMRI scan. That wouldn't be as stressful as making sure you had no.2 pencils at all, would it? [url]
- The whole idea that there's a single test for general intelligence is flawed. The IQ myth persists because it's a simple-sounding way to gauge intelligence, but IQ scores are very rough estimates of a particular kind of cognitive ability. [url]
- How much of a brain does a person really need to function normally? Doctors have discovered a few people with hydrocephalus or other conditions where patients have lost brain matter volume who were still able to lead regular lives. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: brain fingerprints, brains, cognition, fmri, human intelligence, iq
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
no Brains
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cyborg world
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Cyborg world
ftfy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
IQ is a joke...
It doesn't take into account someone who is a great artist, writer, athlete, etc. All of those require intelligence in a very different way from a scientist, but they are still very smart in what they do well.
I put no faith in the IQ tests... I happen to have a high number... but I'm good at the sciences... couldn't paint my way out of a paper bag, or play a sport well to save my life... so what does it really mean?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: IQ is a joke...
You're therefore more intelligent than me because your scientific capabilities lend you a greater tendency towards a livable salary. Writers make shit; therefore I'm not "smart" enough to do something that puts bread on my table independently of others. I call this $Q, or dollar quotient. Really the only thing that matters in our society is whether you have the chops to provide for yourself without the taxpayers artificially supporting your existence. As someone who has zero STEM ability, I don't meet that criteria. Therefore, you're smart and I'm dumb, according to the $Q model.
Kim Kardashian is a complete moron otherwise, but clearly has enough $Q savvy to go above and beyond in sustaining herself economically. By contrast, someone who is a gifted writer or artist whose work doesn't sell because the market just isn't buying the life of the mind is actually dumber than Kim Kardashian, even if he or she is the next Picasso or Chekhov.
It's sad, but intelligence clearly doesn't matter when you take the all-important $Q into account. I envy you, but not enough to vote for confiscation of your attained wealth through your gifts of having marketable skills in order to keep myself alive (aka welfare). If the market craves scientists, let it have scientists. I won't make the market eat its vegetables and take on the arts if it clearly isn't interested in subsidizing them. Onward and upward.
[ link to this | view in thread ]