DailyDirt: If People Were Meant To Fly In Space...
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
When the Soviets launched Sputnik 1 in 1957, the US launched a satellite and put together its own space agency less than a year later. In the past week, NASA has commemorated the loss of its astronauts in the Challenger and Columbia disasters, as well as the men who died in Apollo 1. There's a new generation of kids who have only seen SpaceX and Soyuz take stuff into low earth orbit (plus maybe a successful Orion test) -- and a few other private companies reaching the edge of space. Robots have been doing an excellent job of exploring mars and other destinations in our solar system, but we shouldn't forget about manned space exploration entirely.- The Columbia space shuttle disaster might have been averted with a second space shuttle launch to dock with it and rescue the astronauts. A rescue mission would have involved a complex space walk and several unknown risks, but plans were drawn up -- and that's why subsequent shuttle launches had a second shuttle on standby. (But the rescuing shuttle would still have the same problem of a potentially damaged wing, too...) [url]
- The Challenger explosion was predicted by a handful of NASA engineers who argued against launching the shuttle because they had data that indicated the o-rings wouldn't seal properly under the cold weather conditions. Bob Ebeling still blames himself, but hindsight is always clearer -- and it wasn't Ebeling's decision to launch. [url]
- NASA has lost 24 pilots and astronauts in space launches and test flights. Manned space exploration is still a NASA priority, and spaceflight will always be an inherently risky venture -- especially as it pushes technology to ever more distant places. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: apollo, bob ebeling, manned missions, mars, soyez, space, space exploration, space shuttle
Companies: nasa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
When You Said “Orion” ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
r reagan already had television time set aside on all three major networks for later that morning to deliver his teacher in space speech. it would have sounded really silly with no teacher up there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And yet, xkcd does have a point
"we" are at the bottom of a gravity well and a 'theme' of Techdirt is - your fellow man is an ass.
And while the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp6dsKleGpU uses nukes as the reason we will kill each other - there are plenty of other ways to go.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Of course it would take hundreds of text pages to fully catalog the staggering waste, mismanagement and corruption by NASA. NASA was a huge mistake from the getgo -- the little it actually achieved could easily have been handled by other existing federal agencies & private industry, at dramatically lower costs.
Indeed, all those citizen space cadets & media propagandists who advocate extravagant manned space travel and general space exploration -- should directly pay NASA for it... by sending their own cash/checks/money-orders routinely to the NASA bureaucracy.
STOP stealing money from the taxpayers for your silly space fantasies & space hobbying !
GO to Mars and have fun -- but do it with your own money and that of people who VOLUNTARILY share your exotic dreams.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Columbia disaster WOULD have been averted if NASA had authorized a spacewalk to visually inspect the damage to the wing instead of relying on mathematical probabilities and guesswork. Frankly, I think that's a problem that runs through everything that NASA does.
"See how this number is .003 instead of .005? That proves that there is an Earth size planet orbiting this star which is 400,000,000,000 miles away, covered in giant diamond mountains with emerald tips and heavy concentrations of methane."
I predicted this. No, not the explosion, but the fact that after a little time had passed, people would be coming out of the woodwork to say that they had known this was going to happen. In fact, right after it exploded, I told someone "They claim they have no idea what went wrong, but a month from now, the news will be interviewing janitors at NASA who will say that they warned everyone that this was going to happen."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
America's human space flight programs cost around $7 billion a year. By comparison, Americans spent more than $154 billion on alcohol. The costs of dealing with the latter almost certainly cost the taxpayers more than the former.
In the ’70s the USAF calculated that using satellites to conduct weather reconnaissance saved $100,000 a day over the cost of flying airplanes to get the job done. In today's dollars that would probably be $1,000,000 per day. The space program has given also us communications, remote sensing (for resource and crop monitoring) and GPS satellites and much, much more. Who knows what we'll get once the launch rate goes up bringing launch costs down.
As a programmer, I believe in making backups. The same concept applies to humanity: Establishing a self-sustaining colony on another planet is a Very Good Idea.
Over the four-and-a-half-billion-year history of Earth, few events have truly mattered: There was the advent of single-celled life, multi-celled life, the development of plants, then animals.
The next step - the first big step in 540 million years - is the extension of life to another planet. It could happen in our lifetime. Thinks about that.
Or, if that's not your priority, keep spending it on stadiums for millionaires, and alcohol.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Above, you hear -- 'Hey, the government wastes all kinds of money (like sports stadiums)... why pick on my NASA hobby pet interest'.
{... Duh, the answer is to stop ALL wasteful government spending, including NASA, sports subsidies, bloated military, and hundreds of other things}
And -- 'Hey, NASA only spends $7Billion a year'.
{...NASA has spent/wasted over a TRILLION Dollars since late 1950s and always has expensive future plans! Think of all the other things that Trillion could have been productively used for -- a cure for cancer, clean water & air & power-generation for citizens, safe roads & vehicles & infrastructure, general health & dental care, lower taxes, etc. etc. --- instead we get moonrocks & TV interviews with unnecessary astronauts. NASA gets 5-times as much federal spending compared to other areas of science}
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
btw - you really think that "saved" money would be spent on things you approve of? A cure for cancer, clean water & air ... fat chance there day dreamer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
It's not like things developed for space haven't benefited the private sector. If they kept the patent for Velcro say, and other things developed for or by them, would they be self funding now?
The real question, the one you don't ask or answer is, is exploration good or bad? It's not like it's a new concept for humans.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It will be great! .. It will be fabulous !
Why not privatize the roads, all of 'em. It won't be that bad ... paying a new toll every time you turn. They just send you the bill, which will be way more than the amount you pay via for roads via taxation.
What a great idea!
[ link to this | view in thread ]