Ex-Employer Has To Pay Former Employees $4,000 For Email Snooping

from the watch-where-you-snoop dept

We've discussed a bunch of cases lately involving employers and the legality of reading emails of employees. The latest one is a bit strange. It involves the owner of a gym, who had two ex-employees set up a competing gym. Somewhere along the way, she became aware of some emails they wrote while still employed by her, planning out their new gym. It appears that this is because they accessed their private email accounts via the gym's computers, but left their accounts logged in. After a variety of back-and-forth maneuverings, the employer has been forced to pay $4,000 to the ex-employees for snooping on their emails, in violation of the Stored Communications Act. Of course, what's most interesting is that if the employer had wanted to get access to those emails legally, she could have probably used the normal discovery process during a lawsuit -- but by snooping, she ended up not being able to use those emails in her own lawsuit, and owing those ex-employees a few thousand dollars.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: email, snooping, stored communications act


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Patent Application, 26 Jan 2011 @ 12:14am

    Here is a similar story

    A Michigan woman whose ex-husband could go to jail for alleged email snooping is defending herself for having him charged.

    “What does he expect me to do?” a tearful Clara Walker told ABC-TV’s Nightline this week about the criminal charges against her third husband, Leon Walker.

    “It’s all about him right now. He forgot what he did to me. He violated my privacy.”

    Leon Walker, 33, last week told Nightline that he read his wife’s emails to her second husband, with whom she was having an affair, only out of fear for the safety of their daughter.

    He said she left her password by the shared computer. She denied that.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Bengie, 26 Jan 2011 @ 5:16am

      Re:

      Except he's going to get 5 years in prison while this gym guy will only get a $4k fine.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    btrussell (profile), 26 Jan 2011 @ 3:53am

    So I guess if they were having sex in the office, owner walks in while they are taping, owner would have to leave so as to not violate their copyright and privacy.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    PRMan, 26 Jan 2011 @ 8:48am

    Nobody should ever go to jail if...

    Nobody should ever go to jail for more than 5 years for a non-violent crime...

    And for snooping a couple e-mails? Give the man a fine. Not jail.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.