Hadopi Wants To Kick People Offline For Watching Unauthorized Streams As Well
from the mission-creep dept
Well, well. A top guy at the French "kick you off the internet" Hadopi agency is apparently claiming that the organization's mandate goes beyond just people accused (not convicted) of file sharing, and could be used against people watching unauthorized streaming content as well. There's no indication given as to how Hadopi or anyone else would actually be able to find out who was watching streamed content, short of seizing log files. But, won't it be great when you can lose your internet connection, because your friends pointed you to a video on YouTube that wasn't properly licensed?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Monitoring streaming content would mean to watch the HTTP traffic. Watching the HTTP traffic means violating people's privacy, which is not allowed in France.
What is more, spying on the ground of sole suspicion, let alone just for illegal downloading while not giving out your IP is not allowed either.
Indeed the main difference as we know, between HTTP and P2P, is that you don't tell your IP publicly, and seizing logs wont work out either, due to French rights specificities.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
French privacy doesn't rule it out, because like any other European Union country, French ISPs have to keep logs of everyone's internet activity for at least 6 months. The data is there, they just need to search it for offending streams.
Ain't it great to think that this data-retention law was passed to "fight child porn and terrorism", but can now be used to find "criminals" who watch a video stream they didn't even know were "illegal".
Besides where's the report that shows how effective data-retention has been to fight child porn and terrorism? I suspect they've never even caught one like that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Also, what about streaming content from your hard drive online? I don't do it myself, but I have heard of some hard drives that allow you to stream video files from the hard drive while its connected to the internet, and watch it say via a media centre program on your Xbox 360. So is the French government literally going to watch what my Media Centre does?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Political posturing
Gatekeepers HATE the web and they are doing everything they can to gain some sort of legal control over it that swings the pendulum. What they don't seem to understand is they are fighting against the wave of human nature and technology. Good luck with that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This how just how the circus begin, it starts small and then they try to go beyond, the problem in this case is that the beyond to be reached need to pass through the public space, how long will people keep quiet about it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not happening
What is noticeable is that they try to make people believe the contrary. In their second warning, sent by paper mail, they say that "we remind you that volontary conducts of consulting (...) works protected by copyright, commonly called 'piracy', are offenses of counterfeiting punished by courts".
When I asked them why they such thing whereas it is false, they answered that the warnings "were written primarily in order to be understandable by those who receive". They never denied that they say something the law does not mandate, and they even said that people can read the law if they want an accurate view of it. That is to check they are lying.
Here is a story (in French) I wrote about this:
http://www.numerama.com/magazine/17863-streaming-l-hadopi-trahit-le-droit-34dans-le-souci-d-e tre-comprehensible34.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
*shakes head
Why not just get rid of the internet? It's not like people will revolt if it happens.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not happening
Mon dieu! Tu est deja dans la marde.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: *shakes head
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Political posturing
Agreed, 400 years of copyright about to come crashing down. Good on them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]