Truck Maker Discovers Chinese Knockoff Company; Helps It Come Up With Its Own Design

from the well-there's-a-different-strategy dept

Wed, Feb 23rd 2011 11:49am — Mike Masnick

We've seen different companies respond in different and creative ways to companies making knockoffs in the past. One of my favorites was the South African clothing firm that created an entire (secret) knockoff line of clothes to "compete" with unauthorized knockoffs. However Sebastian Brannstrom points us to a really surprising story out of Sweden. While the linked article mostly complains about knockoffs and talks about the need for greater "patent" protections, at the end there's the fascinating story of truckmaker Scania (Google translation of the original Swedish) and how it responded to the discovery of a Chinese firm making knockoff trucks. Rather than freak out, it actually reached out to the firm, and helped them design different trucks.

The company admits that it knew that a lawsuit would be pointless, and figured it was worth a shot to try a different approach:

"We told them that we welcome competition but we think you should invest in a unique identity towards your customers"

Scania even gave them design tips.

"We gave them sketch-like ideas on the lines of the cab that you can do instead.

They later came back with a sketch of what they had thought about.

"We thought it was still too much like us. Then they did the job and came back again. It was a very friendly and constructive discussion. They respected what we said and made sure that they have not crossed the border again. Their next series will not be like Scania, "said Mr Harborn.

Now there's a strategy you don't see every day...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copying, knockoffs
Companies: scania

31 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Phillip, 23 Feb 2011 @ 11:54am

Huh what do you know
Man, who would have believed that being polite and reasonable to people gets you a positive response.

Next thing we'll hear is that suing people out of the blue will make people angry and possibly counter-sue!

What a strange world we live in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TheStupidOne, 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:38pm
  
  Re: Huh what do you know
  I don't believe it. In my experience the only way to get what I want is to use some combination of a claw hammer, fillet knife, branding iron, and a teddy bear. Anything else is just a bloody waste of time.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Phillip, 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:42pm
    
    Re: Re: Huh what do you know
    Based on that description I'd say the time is bloody regardless of whether or not it's wasted.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:00pm

...and the chinese company will sell the toolings for the replica Scandia trucks to another Chinese company that just happens to be owned by someone's brother, and they will start knocking them out.

The polite answer only means they know they got you screwed, and are more than willing to take more if you give it to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Designerfx (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:19pm
  
  Re:
  It's your exact comment that represents the kind of people who would never do this.
  
  If it wasn't for people like that, who basically represent capitalism, we wouldn't have issues with IP in the first place. People need to get beyond "I'm being screwed" and look at "how can I actually benefit from this?". Those who don't have just as long a list as those that do.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:20pm
    
    Re: Re:
    What you aren't getting is that there is no benefit. Scania helps the Chinese company design a new truck, in theory putting Scania behind, and the Chinese company keeps the tooling for the knock off truck, and likely sells it on to another Chinese company that will produce it.
    
    So instead of a knock off Scania truck, you end up with a newly designed truck and a Scania knockoff.
    
    Seems like they are helping to make themselves even less relevant.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Designerfx (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:45pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      What I am getting is that competition is better for everyone, unless you fail to realize that.
      
      That's the most basic of economics. If you're focused on the knockoff, then you're still missing the bigger picture.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:54pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      It's kind of amusing how every single one of your arguments relies on assertions that a certain series of events will happen in the future.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2011 @ 3:10pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You don't think it hasn't been done before?
        
        The Chinese market is rife with knock off cars and trucks, exact replicas in appearance to products from outside companies, including a really nice knock off of the bmw X5. It looks great, but drives only so-so (it is a physical replica, not a mechanical one).
        
        When pressured, these companies usually fold up, but the products live on with other companies, under other names.
        
        Do you honestly think a country full of 3 wheeled carts is going to suddenly throw away the tooling for a perfectly functional truck just because someone asked them nicely?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        teka (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 4:04pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        throw away the tooling
        
        You make it sound like making minor changes in the shape of next-year's truck involved tearing down the factory or replacing all the equipment. Car and truck plants around the world manage to do a changeover, many of them yearly, without somehow selling off "the tooling" to a knockoff company.
        
        So instead of a raging legal fight across borders and continents, with millions in lawyer fees across years, we have a few hours overall of work by a salaried manager (Mr Harborn) and one or two sketch artists, also probably salaried or doing these pieces at no great cost in time or money. This is a success story for everyone but lawyers.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2011 @ 6:59pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        There is a good point, with massive legal cost I'm wondering if it is not cheaper to pay your own design team to create different products and hand over to competitors, if the goal is to make others not copy you, then you can just get all those refused designs and hand over to others.
        
        Now that would scare the bejesus out of American manufacturer's, as their goal is to extinguish competitors not help them in any way, and that is why other countries try harder to terminate them and feel no remorse in doing so they don't need them, they are predators and must die, on the other hand Scania may be building something that could help them, since those other manufacturer's now know that they can count on them for partnerships.
        
        The point being American companies bring nothing to the table and will be treated us such, because they are so annoying.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Chris in Utah (profile), 24 Feb 2011 @ 5:54am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        define utopia ;)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:23pm
  
  Re:
  [Citation, as always, Needed], TAM.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hiiragi Kagami (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:31pm

Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
Scania over-reacted in this, despite being helpful. Their designs aren't any different than other European trucks. Telling this company to change their designs would be similar to Peterbilt telling Kenworth to "knock it off. Here, make this." and that's not going to happen.

Trucks are working toward a more aerodynamic design so it's not going to be surprising to see many pick up on the ideas, like curved fenders, air dams higher than the trailer, and a lower cab profile, just to name a few things I've seen done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- crade (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:43pm
  
  Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
  Apparently all they did was ask and offer help if they decided to change the design. They could have done this no matter what the reason was that they didn't like the chinese company's design. I don't see the issue.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- asymptote, 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:48pm
  
  Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
  Slightly beside the point about Peterbilt telling Kenworth to "knock it off...", note that both companies, along with DAF, belong to PACCAR. Unless I misunderstand your point, perhaps a better example would be to say "Peterbilt telling Freightliner..."
  
  I like the story. Slightly off the point again, in the '50s and '60s we ridiculed Japanese companies for making inferior copies of our stuff. Then they surpassed us in many ways.
  
  Toward the point, does anybody else feel it would be mutually beneficial to find ways to work with the Chinese?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - crade (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:49pm
    
    Re: Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
    We do aparently...
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/prairies/alberta-eyeing-better-business-t ies-with-asia-throne-speech-declares/article1916427/
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- athe, 23 Feb 2011 @ 12:49pm
  
  Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
  Yet, if you know your trucks, you could look at a Peterbilt and a Kenworth, and know just by looking at it (no logos) which is which.
  
  Of course there are going to be similarities in the designs of these things, that's pretty much the way it is. Those extra ideas that you mention, those are likely the kind of things Scania is trying to encourage the Chinese company to try for themselves.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:46pm
    
    Re: Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
    Only because Scania have made lots of profit this year. If they were going under, you can bet they would have sued.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Insider, 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:47pm
  
  Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
  The Chinese company in question was not merely making a truck based off of the Scania image as your comment would have everyone believe. It was reverse engineering the truck and making nearly IDENTICAL copy. Aside from some regional features needed in the truck for the Chinese-Asian regions, the only real difference was the emblem on the front.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - crade (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:53pm
    
    Re: Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
    So what?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ChronoFish (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 2:34pm
    
    Re: Re: Well, I suppose this can be considered good news.
    Isn't that the point.
    
    Scania is not protecting the concept of "The Truck". It's protecting its design. As a non-truck person with a 4-year old who loves trucks and truck books, even I can spot the unique design of Scania.
    
    A carbon-copy of the design (the looks and feel) is precisely what Scania needs to protect. Compare performance to other manufactures and I would venture to guess that that they are not blowing the competition away in HP or gas mileage or emmissions, or power plant options.
    
    If it's the design they want to protect, and the Chinese manufacture is willing to change without any monetary (or legal) incentive, why are you being so negative about the story?
    
    -CF
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
boney, 23 Feb 2011 @ 1:42pm

Reminds me of the old days
Back in the 40's-70's when someone copied something you were doing, you just said "Hey, competition is good, I will make better stuff/things and whip their asses". Now it is "Hey, I will sue them out of existence because I have 40 lawyers and 500 billion dollars of tax payer money!".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChronoFish (profile), 23 Feb 2011 @ 2:43pm

If I were a truck manufacture
I would probably consider working with a "copy cat" manufacture, not to dissuade them from using a my design, but to use them as a form of market research. Have the start with my design... change up some of the detailing and see how it impacts sales/selection. If the options change fast enough the "copy" company never gets true traction. Meanwhile I can incorporate the proven design changes back into my main line.

-CF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ryan Diederich, 23 Feb 2011 @ 5:29pm

Hey
No reason to hate on capitalism, its the reason you can read this blog and the reason you arent starving right now. Its also how the world works.

Anyways, capitalism and being nice arent mutually exclusive, you can do both. The truck maker Scania benefitted in many ways by doing this.

For one, they made their name known not for their litigation powers, but by the quality of their managment and owners. If I was looking into buying some trucks, I would consider them above others, for no other reason than they did this. It sets them apart, and gives me a reason that i would want to buy from them rather than another company, which may feel differently about a similar situation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matthew A. Sawtell, 24 Feb 2011 @ 4:53am

Trouble with "helping"...
... the troubling aspect I have with this article is when Scandia will be hit with a lawsuit because the P.R. Chinese's product was involved in some sort of accident. Bad enough that OEMs have had to deal with fingers pointed at them when the product was produced by a counterfeiter...

http://forum.autoworld.com.my/index.php?showtopic=25444&mode=threaded

... worse yet if said counterfeiter can claim it was "helped" by the original OEM.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chris in Utah (profile), 24 Feb 2011 @ 5:58am
  
  Re: Trouble with "helping"...
  My head rattled for a second...
  
  Framework
  vs
  Actual builder.
  
  *pop*...There that's clearer.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Matthew A. Sawtell (profile), 24 Feb 2011 @ 7:09am
    
    Re: Re: Trouble with "helping"...
    Comes down to this scenario: Truck driving down road, driver attempts to hit the breaks before hitting some crossing the street, truck hits person. Person sues driver, company, and truck maker. In this case, the shangzhai truck maker can attempt to include Scandia in the lawsuit because "they helped design the truck".
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Martin, 24 Feb 2011 @ 8:31pm

It really doesn't matter what each company did.

As long as they keep lawyers out of it.
It is the greedy lawyer, who always screwing up things by threatening, suing, etc..

Do you see? For a fraction of a lawsuit cost, new truck design was born. And that is what I like about this story very much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matthew A. Sawtell (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 4:47am

Re: It really doesn't matter what each company did.
Not old enough to remember the Ford Pinto, are you? Look up that infamous memo, then come back and attempt to repeat what you just said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
used semi-trucks, 27 Mar 2014 @ 8:17pm

used semi-trucks
Nowadays while investing in truck, one is assigned many choices. There are many used trucks available for sale which can leave a particular questioning about whether to find a new truck maybe a used one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]